• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is it possible for you to do anything that God did not already know you would do?

Beaudreaux

Well-Known Member
This is exactly my point. The argument most people in favor of there not being free will are using is:

God is omniscent
God creates "free will"
All actions as a result of free will are already known by God.
Therefore all actions chosen may only be the choice known by god, 1 choice.
Therefore there is no free will

Correct me if I'm wrong here, I'm bad at explaining things and don't want to use a strawman argument.
No, that's an excellent summary.
I'm creating a counterarguement that basically goes like this:


People have some amount of morality.
Morality requires free will
Therefore free will exists.
I agree with your argument, however it makes an omniscient God impossible.
 

doppelganger

Through the Looking Glass
we have free will because there is no omniscient god. if there is an omniscient god, then free will is impossible.
Do you believe that things occur that do not have any natural causes? In other words, do you believe in supernatural events?
 

JMorris

Democratic Socialist
i dont know if anyone else saw this movie, but i suggest it. it was on PBS, it was called Putting God on trial, or something like that, im not completly sure. it takes place during ww2, and its about jews in a concentration camp. and while their there, they decide to put god on trial, for breaking his convenant with the jews. i suggest it not because of my own particular bias, but simply its good and thought provoking. any way, during the movie, their talking about the nature of free will. a guy stands up and talks about when he got arrested and dragged off by the nazis. he had 3 sons. they took his 3 sons and were putting them in a seperate truck than he was going in. he went to a guard and pleaded with him to give him his sons. the guard said to pick one. and the man wonders what choice he had? who was he supposed to pick? the weakest, oldest, youngest ect? he asks where his free will was in this?
 

rageoftyrael

Veritas
this might have been in another thread, but a bunch of us came to the conclusion that the supernatural is simply the natural that we don't yet understand. As for an athiest believing in free will, that only makes sense with their beliefs.

If there is no being that created us, and we are here by accident, then it would logically follow that our life is our own, we make choices and go from there. only when a god or diety is put into the mix is our free will threatened. that is how i see it anyway.

i either said this in this thread or another one similar to this. if there is fate, then there can be an omniscient god, and in fact they are most likely one and the same.
 

doppelganger

Through the Looking Glass
im not sure what your asking. please explain

When a tree is hit by lightning and starts on fire, you'd agree that every aspect of what occurred to bring about that event was caused by prior events or motions, transfers of energy, etc., right?

Events in reality occur because they have natural causes, even if I can't completely account for all of the aspects of what causes an event to occur. Agreed?
 

JMorris

Democratic Socialist
yes. and because something that happens now isnt explainable through science, that dosent make it supernatural.
 

doppelganger

Through the Looking Glass
yes. and because something that happens now isnt explainable through science, that dosent make it supernatural.
Exactly. Now let's make it seem like we are adding an element. You place a saucer of cream and a plate of chicken meat in front of the cat. The cat laps up the cream first. Is there a cause for the cat lapping the cream before eating the chicken?

If so, knowing what you know about an animal like a cat, what would be the immediate cause?
 

JMorris

Democratic Socialist
doppelgänger;1517790 said:
Exactly. Now let's make it seem like we are adding an element. You place a saucer of cream and a plate of chicken meat in front of the cat. The cat laps up the cream first. Is there a cause for the cat lapping the cream before eating the chicken?

If so, knowing what you know about an animal like a cat, what would be the immediate cause?

please get to the point. there are any number of different reasons why the cat would do that. i dont like riddles
 

doppelganger

Through the Looking Glass
please get to the point. there are any number of different reasons why the cat would do that. i dont like riddles
It's not a riddle and it's rather obvious. What's happening any time a cat responds to stimuli? Besides, I already got to the point and you said you didn't understand it. So I'm going through it step by step.
 
Top