Audie
Veteran Member
Neither was Neville ChamberlinOh Audie!!!!
Kamala is NOT a fraudster, cheater etc, and with no convictions at all. ........
That must be so irritating!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Neither was Neville ChamberlinOh Audie!!!!
Kamala is NOT a fraudster, cheater etc, and with no convictions at all. ........
That must be so irritating!
As much so as most other losers who've held the job.You think shes going to be adequate to the task?
Hopefully MAGA will be able to control themselves this time and won't throw a massive tantrum and attempt another insurrection because they can't deal with their feelings.Oh I'm sure the freak out will be quite apparent when the election results come out in November. I have a feeling it'll be something like this.....
No single person can ever be adequate to such a task! Even kings need their many ministers and secretaries. The question then becomes, can she cobble together a cabinet and advisers that will provide her the support she needs to cope with the task?You think shes going to be adequate to the task?
Mr Chamberlain was a gentleman and very good politician.Neither was Neville Chamberlin
So true.Mr Chamberlain was a gentleman and very good politician.
However, Mr Trump is no gentleman....and clearly he's a fascist would-be dictator.
He's out getting a diet Mountain Dew: Internet Slams J.D. Vance for 'Cringe' Diet Mountain Dew Joke: 'Alienated Every Voter Base'I actually liked Vance's book, Hillbilly Elegy. What ever happened to it's author? Where'd he go?
You seem to object to this. Progressives want to see more diversity in government and elsewhere and believe that there are qualified people of all genders, races, ethnicities, and sexual preference for any job, so let's find more of them and make these institutions resemble the general public.As I stated she may have been the best qualified woman. Biden picked her(a woman) because that was a promise he made to trying get the nomination.
IOW... You do this for me, (give him the nomination) and I do this for you, (pick a woman for VP.)
Look at the past of Bidens 2020 campaign promises...
"Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden committed Sunday to picking a woman for his vice president if he were to win the party’s nomination."
"Biden also said that he would try to make his Cabinet reflect the demographics of the country and would choose a black woman to serve on the Supreme Court if a vacancy were to open during his presidency"
Do they reflect DEI for VP and the Supreme Court? In a way they do.
Or he just said them to get the nomination/votes and it worked.
I'm not against females being in leadership posistions. The talk was why was a female(her) was picked. A female was picked because of a trying to get the nomination promise.
As I stated she may have been the best qualified woman. Biden picked her(a woman) because that was a promise he made to trying get the nomination.
IOW... You do this for me, (give him the nomination) and I do this for you, (pick a woman for VP.)
You imply that Biden didn't want to pick a woman, that he was pressured to do so. If he's like me, that's what he WANTED to do.Biden had to fulfill his nomination promise to pick a woman if given the nomination or even his own party would have shunned him.
For the same reason you don't put someone in your will and tell them about it. For the same reason you don't hire your competitor's son and make him a principal in your business.Why not make it the same with the presidency.
If the pres is a dem, have a repub VP
If the pres is a repub, have a dem VP
Money was also spent promoting Trump. Money spent trashing Biden was wasted. But the opposite is true for the Democrats. Any money spent promoting Biden was wasted, and any spent on pointing out why Trump is unfit to be president will help Harris and the Democrats.However I can understand all the frustration in the Trump camp. They spent many millions campaigning against Biden. Now with Biden dropping out all that money was spent for nothing.
No, not coincidentally. By design, and many approve of the choice.So the possible candidate out of a couple hundred million just coincidentally happened to check the pc boxes.
Sure. Every Democrat who ran for office from Bill Clinton through Gore, Kerry, Hillary, Obama, and Biden have been adequate to the task. They're more or less all off the same mold, and their choices as president were or would have been a lot alike - a steady hand promoting both business and the middle class and protecting the weak.You think shes going to be adequate to the task?
And what would be the mechanism for forcing Biden out against his will?We don't know if he was forced out by the party elite putting the party before the country but my opinion is yes.
That's a Republican dream. The Democrats aren't interested.the 25th Admendment is used to remove him for office.
So strange that you mention Chamberlin and think that is somehow supports whatever point you are trying to make.Neither was Neville Chamberlin
Absolutely.So true.
Also, Neville Chamberlain's reputation has arguably suffered from unfair criticism and accusations. He was in an impossible situation and tried real hard to make the best of it.
It is not at all clear that anyone else would have done any better.