. . . does Karma not recognize moral offenses? Is it more like cause and effect with man applying his own concept of morality to it?
In other words, if you take something that doesn't belong to you, there will be an applicable and appropriate effect for that particular action/cause. Karma doesn't see this as necessarily good or bad, but just natural. While we humans fit our own man-made concepts of morality and perhaps "justice" to this natural process?
Ohhh, if that is it, then now I get it. I still don't agree with it, but I get it.
After re-reading my post above, I must correct myself.
If Karma is simply causality at work on a physical level, then I certainly find no reason to disagree with it. But if so, I suppose I must ask what the big deal is?
If water is exposed to tempratures at or below 32 degrees fahrenheit, it will freeze thereby converting from liquid to solid. Voila' . . . Karma.
If fire is isolated from its oxygen supply, it will suffocate and extinguish. Voila' . . . Karma.
I don't disagree with the concept of cause and effect. So, if that is what people mean when they refer to "Karma", then I get it.
But how is Karma different from physical causality? What is it about Karma, this principle of cause and effect, that makes it somehow a religious or spiritual principle?