McBell
Unbound
And you still did not explain how it is exploitation...I would probably label you a masochist if the practice of self-debasement gave you pleasure.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And you still did not explain how it is exploitation...I would probably label you a masochist if the practice of self-debasement gave you pleasure.
And you still did not explain how it is exploitation...
She's dodged that a couple times now. Much easier for her to judge someone as having something wrong with them rather than to explain her stance.
Based upon what she has posted in this thread, I have to conclude that her real issue concerning prostitution is that sex is involved.
She seems to ignore the fact that her same argument can be equally applied to fast food workers.
Unless you harp on the sex part....
The sex part? Yes that could be it! My objection to it is because it involves sex. who would have thought? Some of us believe sex is sacred and shouldn't be debased by such things as commerce. Is that surprising?
The sex part? Yes that could be it! My objection to it is because it involves sex. who would have thought? Some of us believe sex is sacred and shouldn't be debased by such things as commerce. Is that surprising?
Just wondering, if sex is sacred, isn't it best to have it as much as possible?
I used to have a t-shirt that I used to wear outside when I'd do some gardening, and sometimes I'd just wear the t-shirt and my underwear....it was from Larry Flynt's club and it said -
"Relax! It's just sex!"
Now, find the relevence.
See above posts [mine] about moderation and the occlusion of the soul.
I was only joking Sorry!
Which is fine, nobody is suggesting you be forced to do so.
The problem is your stance seems to involve forcing that view on others using the law.
Why are you lying, when did I even mention the law?
Of course I am not in complete acceptance but believe education and medical attention is the best course to go rather than prohibitionHence why I said 'seems to involve' rather that quoting an explicit statement.
So am I wrong here? Do you support the banning of such things as prostitution or pornography, or the complete acceptance of them (at least legally) or somewhere in between?
Nope, not the least bit surprising.The sex part? Yes that could be it! My objection to it is because it involves sex. who would have thought? Some of us believe sex is sacred and shouldn't be debased by such things as commerce. Is that surprising?
Of course I am not in complete acceptance but believe education and medical attention is the best course to go rather than prohibition
I agree.CynthiaCyper said:It's both when prostitution (and the includes the porn industry) becomes mainstream it pretty much affect how women are generally viewed. We become objects, tools to be used and nothing more.
Of course I am not in complete acceptance but believe education and medical attention is the best course to go rather than prohibition
Education according to what source?
Medical attention? STD screening or psychological analysis?