outhouse
Atheistically
I don't agree with you.
Regards
Provide evidence from credible sources.
You have no knowledge here at all.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't agree with you.
Regards
Abraham never existed as a real person, yet islam claims he was a real prophet
It claims all the mythology was real.
The exodus factually did not happen as written, yet islam claims it is.
The fanaticism involved is exactly like YEC denouncing evolution. But instead of a minority group its the whole religion as a whole.
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history? Because plagiarized books have no credibility at all.
No doubt Torah is older but it is corrupted by the narrators/scribes/clergy for their own selfish motives. It is not same as revealed on Moses.
Moses received Word of Revelation from G-d.
Zoroaster also received Word of Revelation from G-d.
Neither Zoroaster copied/plagiarized/adapted anything from Moses nor Moses; they both received message from G-d directly.
The same is the case of Muhammad; he received Word of Revelation from G-d directly.
Regards
Why is this such a hard concept to grasp? Hypothetically speaking, let's pretend there was indeed a God. And he sent his message of monotheism to many messengers throughout history in different parts of the world... Would it make sense that these "religions" (Judaism, Christianity, Sabians (Madaeans), Zoroastrianism, Yazidi's, Islam, etc ) would be very similar?
Why is this such a hard concept to grasp? Hypothetically speaking, let's pretend there was indeed a God. And he sent his message of monotheism to many messengers throughout history in different parts of the world... Would it make sense that these "religions" (Judaism, Christianity, Sabians (Madaeans), Zoroastrianism, Yazidi's, Islam, etc ) would be very similar?
90. Al-Balad,91. Al-Shams,92. Al-Lail,93. Al-Duha,94. Al-Inshirah,95. Al-Tin,96. Al-`Alaq,97. Al-Qadr,98. Al-Bayyinah,99. Al-Zilzal,100. Al-`Adiyat,101. Al-Qari`ah,102. Al-Takathur,103. Al-`Asr,104. Al-Humazah,105. Al-Fil,106. Al-Quraish,107. Al-Ma`un,108. Al-Kauthar,109. Al-Kafirun,110. Al-Nasr,111. Al-Lahab,112. Al-Ikhlas,113. Al-Falaq,114. Al-Nas,1. Al-Fatihah.
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history?
That means they were not real
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history?
because monotheism did not start until after 622 BC with king Josiah's reforms.
it had nothing to do with Abraham.
before this time there was no monotheism in Israelite culture.
These aren't historical documents. Your argument is lost on people of faith. Historically, you can't prove ANYTHING from ANY religion. But just because something wasn't historically documented, it doesn't mean it didn't happen. My personal opinion... All organized religions are truth mixed with falsehood. But I have my reasons for thinking that. However, they can't prove said events DID happen. And you can't prove they did NOT happen.
These aren't historical documents. Your argument is lost on people of faith. Historically, you can't prove ANYTHING from ANY religion. But just because something wasn't historically documented, it doesn't mean it didn't happen. My personal opinion... All organized religions are truth mixed with falsehood. But I have my reasons for thinking that. However, they can't prove said events DID happen. And you can't prove they did NOT happen.
Zoroastrianism existed long before 622BC. Not monotheistic?