Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
In your head!And, yet again, I fail to see where my misunderstanding lies. I was clarifying a post made by Bunyip which YOU CLEARLY STATED WAS CONFUSING. Where is the misunderstanding, exactly?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In your head!And, yet again, I fail to see where my misunderstanding lies. I was clarifying a post made by Bunyip which YOU CLEARLY STATED WAS CONFUSING. Where is the misunderstanding, exactly?
It was a waste of time then....and a waste of time now...and so that's closure...What was the problem? Reading the exchange again I was polite, on topic and perfectly rational. The point that atheism makes no scientific claims remains apparently lost to you. I stand by everything I said and am happy to clarify whatever has confused you.
Apparently, because it certainly doesn't seem to exist on this forum.In your head!
Y'know, I think we can go on asking ourselves that until the end of time and never come up with an answer, so I'll just give one now:who won?
If one want to reside in World, than Science is Better.Is Science Better Than Religion?
I think that is a purely subjective thing.
Why can't victim THANK-GOD for giving him the option of prosthetic leg ?Really? Suppose someone has lost their legs. You ask them: We can give you new prosthetic legs, or we can pray that your legs grow back.' Which option are they going to go for?
I agree. And my subjective opinion is that science is better. But beyond opinion we need to have a specific race to run. I think that science wins out in pretty much all categories but without defined categories of what is "good" then we can't say it without being subjective. What if someone's concept of good is "spreading the word of god". Obviously religion is better at that than science. It doesn't make it an objective good for mankind however.Really? Suppose someone has lost their legs. You ask them: We can give you new prosthetic legs, or we can pray that your legs grow back.' Which option are they going to go for?
the Cosmos itself is my proof...
That's right YOUR proof.
No one else's. Which defines it as belief not proof
and faith (believing) requires not proof.....see Webster's
Don't be sour grapes...you will find your subjective proof eventually...in the mean time....carry on clinging to illusionary conceptual reality like a true atheist....That's right YOUR proof.
No one else's. Which defines it as belief not proof
carry on clinging to illusionary conceptual reality
Not really....are you not aware that objective reality is merely a conceptual interpretation of reality.......subjective reality on the other hand is a real experience for the individual...Unsubstantiated rhetoric.
Not really....are you not aware that objective reality is merely a conceptual interpretation of reality.......subjective reality on the other hand is a real experience for the individual...
I meant for the individual....I am amazed that your phrasing did not cause you to trip on your tongue. Really, "objective reality is merely a conceptual interpretation of reality.......subjective reality on the other hand is a real experience for the individual"? I think you mean, "... subjective reality on the other hand is a real experience to the individual."