• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

is suicide moral?

kashmir

Well-Known Member
Just wondering.
If a person is actually at that point in life, why should we stop them?
It's got to be pretty bad if a person rather just die and get it over with.

opinions?
 
Last edited:

Gjallarhorn

N'yog-Sothep
I see no problem with suicide. It's just as selfish to perform it as it is to claim people committing suicide is selfish.
 

Sees

Dragonslayer
I think it would depend on many factors like the sphere of influence the person has and the specific circumstances in their life.
 

kashmir

Well-Known Member
I see no problem with suicide. It's just as selfish to perform it as it is to claim people committing suicide is selfish.

Huh?
that doesn't even make sense.
So, if someone is in unexplainable pain, it's selfish for them to end it?
 

MD

qualiaphile
Depends on whom you ask. Since liberals don't believe in morality such a question wouldn't apply to them. Some religious groups see it as immoral, while in Japan it was seen as honorable for centuries. I'm not sure how it is seen now.

I personally see it as immoral because I believe that every human has the potential to achieve their dreams and not give up.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Over the years I've completely changed my mind on doctor-assisted suicide. I was strongly apposed to it, but a couple of experiences changed my mind.

One is when my dog came down with cancer and was beginning to really suffer. Even though we had no intention at first to put him down, neither my wife nor I could stand to see him suffer any longer.

A second influence was a movie starring Richard Dreyfus that was based on a true story whereas he was a patient who wanted to die but the hospital and courts wouldn't allow for it. Generally speaking, a movie wouldn't have that much of an influence on my feeling of right and wrong, but it really forced me to think this carefully through in terms if what right should I or others have to tell another adult that they can't go?
 

kashmir

Well-Known Member
Over the years I've completely changed my mind on doctor-assisted suicide. I was strongly apposed to it, but a couple of experiences changed my mind.

One is when my dog came down with cancer and was beginning to really suffer. Even though we had no intention at first to put him down, neither my wife nor I could stand to see him suffer any longer.

A second influence was a movie starring Richard Dreyfus that was based on a true story whereas he was a patient who wanted to die but the hospital and courts wouldn't allow for it. Generally speaking, a movie wouldn't have that much of an influence on my feeling of right and wrong, but it really forced me to think this carefully through in terms if what right should I or others have to tell another adult that they can't go?

Movies lie bro
 

Stephen Dedalus

Trickster
Immoral? Why?
If someone must live just suffering, why live? From my point of view, euthanasia is right if the suicide can't longer live nevermore without the help of the machines, or can't nevermore improve his life.
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Staff member
Premium Member
Some people turn to philosophy for a reason not to commit suicide, but they are mistaken as they think philosophy is a bunch of false excuses to make them feel good.
 

kashmir

Well-Known Member
I would have to agree with this, in some exceptional cases suicide is warranted.
I agree

It's more likely to be OK, yep. Morality generally deals with relationships and interactions.
The law just re-labels it
Immoral? Why?
If someone must live just suffering, why live? From my point of view, euthanasia is right if the suicide can't longer live nevermore without the help of the machines, or can't nevermore improve his life.
Yep

What is not moral is to tempt idea of suicide in others or in yourself.
No one is tempting anyone
 

SkylarHunter

Active Member
I can understand that sometimes dying seems better than being alive, it is certainly easier in comparison to what some people go through, but suicide means giving up on the gift of life and no, that doesn't seem moral to me.
For someone to be that desperate things have to be really bad but I like to think there must be another option.
 

kashmir

Well-Known Member
I can understand that sometimes dying seems better than being alive, it is certainly easier in comparison to what some people go through, but suicide means giving up on the gift of life and no, that doesn't seem moral to me.
For someone to be that desperate things have to be really bad but I like to think there must be another option.
Not really, sometimes, we run out of options
 
Top