oh come! on whats the matter with it?
It's sinful.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
oh come! on whats the matter with it?
Um...If you feel nothing is wrong with it, then pose your own young, underaged daughter in a sheet and splash her picture all over.
Again, she is a minor. Her parents should have been there--their mistake. However, with any questionable pose, the photographer should have talked to her parents first. The ramifications of such a photo are far beyond what a 15 yr. old can understand.
Whether the photo was flattering, tasteful, lewd, or whatever, it was wrong to take it without the parent's consent.
I'm sorry. You can't live your life worrying about the mental cases.
We live in an artistically and sexually repressed society.
Where is the general appreciation for the beauty of the naked human form?
If you feel nothing is wrong with it, then pose your own young, underaged daughter in a sheet and splash her picture all over.
Again, she is a minor. Her parents should have been there--their mistake. However, with any questionable pose, the photographer should have talked to her parents first. The ramifications of such a photo are far beyond what a 15 yr. old can understand.
Whether the photo was flattering, tasteful, lewd, or whatever, it was wrong to take it without the parent's consent.
And I disagree. I think 15 year olds are smarter than not being able to understand any conceivable ramifications.
It's amazing what some parents will put up with when their daughter is earning over three million dollars a year. If your daughter was bringing home that much bacon, would you be so certain of your stance?
I'd like to think so. Morality is one of the few things we have control of in our lives and is something I wouldn't be willing to negotiate. I know not others see this as a moral issue but some see it otherwise. It resembles a story that I heard:
At a dinner party one night, an inebriated Churchill asked an attractive woman whether she would sleep with him for a million pounds. Maybe, the woman said coyly. Would you sleep with me for one pound? Churchill then asked. Of course not, what kind of woman do you think I am? the woman responded indignantly. Madam, weve already established what kind of woman you are, said Churchill, now were just negotiating the price.
The story is a Churchill anecdote (Much shorter in the original):
OK then, let's say your daughter is a professional model. Many of these women start underage, because let's face it: 15 year old girls are the ideal of female beauty. Her job is to have photos taken of her and she brings home a salary from this that is far higher than you and your husband's combined income.
Then, if you decide a particular pouty face is too "sexual" to go to print, how would you explain yourself to those who disagree without sabotaging your daughter's career?
I think equating poor wee Miley with a whore is unfair. This is just a photo. I would let someone take a photo of MY naked back for a dollar. For free even! I'd just be flattered someone thought it was worth taking a picture of. Wouldn't you? It's certainly not the same thing as spending the night with a strange man.
Did she really have anything to gain by taking these photos?
I don't know what I've posted about this so much. I really don't think it's that huge of a deal but I can imagine there will probably be parents who will get their hands on the photo and forbid their kids to watch anything with Miley. That's just the way people are and one of the reasons why I thought it wasn't the best decision. But, that's not my call and my opinion doesn't matter. If her parents felt it was appropriate and she did as well, good for them. If you want, I'll come over and take pictures of you :flirt:. You are between the ages of 18-30, and a single woman right?
I read that the parents were not there when the contraversial photos were taken and were upset when they found out. Possibly this was misreported?Um...
Where did you hear that the release of said photo was without parental consent?
And what if it was released with parental consent?
What would you think then?
My post was with the understanding the the parents were upset about it. There is no way I would agree to my 15 yr. old daughter posing in such a manner. No, 15 yr. olds are not able to fully understand the ramifications. They simply do not have the maturity.The legal age for sex in The Netherlands is 14. She's not underage there. Imagine you live there. Imagine this is release there. Do you change your statement?
And I disagree. I think 15 year olds are smarter than not being able to understand any conceivable ramifications.
btw - while the picture suggests nudity, that doesn't mean she is naked. On top of that, ain't nothing wrong with being naked!
Well, who can say what she or her parents were thinking. I have worked with Disney child stars before and I can tell you they are freakishly mature. They spend most of the year working 12 to 14 hour days in a big, dark sound stage surrounded by arty adults. For schooling they work with a private tutor in their trailer or dressing room. They are under constant pressure to be as professional as their adult peers.
In other words, Miley's "15" is probably about the same as your or my "35".
Kinda sounds like the reasoning behind why Michael Jackson is as messed up as he is. When you have no childhood, you do the strangest things to make up for it when you are older.
Where did you read this?I read that the parents were not there when the contraversial photos were taken and were upset when they found out. Possibly this was misreported?
It must have been online, as that's where I read everything. Fox News, or Cnn.com.Where did you read this?
I read something quite similar in the Globe.
However, I have not heard/seen/read anything from a reputable source about it either way.