Is the evolutionary doctrine a racist doctrine?

[Eli G]

Remember the chicken and egg paradox? It's a very interesting one.

It occurs to me that it would be interesting if some "theorist" of the doctrine of the evolution of species told us if the monkeys lost their tails and became apes, or the apes developed a tail and became monkeys... and which it would be the supposed reason they invent to ensure that.

 

[Pogo]

Many animal species have been known to humans for millennia.

No animal species has become different in the slightest sense. It is an imaginary theory that has no evidence at all.

Even so, that fantasy has grown more and more as time has passed, like when you add chapters to a science fiction story that you never want to end.

again, it is your strawman that is wrong, it is you who think we should see crocoducks,

evolution explains domesticated animals.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Now evolutionists believe that the first apes that became humans appeared in Africa and from there began to travel the world.

No. That would be taxonomists, anthropologists and geneticists.

Let's go back to that moment again: did those supposed first humans resemble any modern human race?

PS: Race is a variable that actually exists and is used to physically describe people. It includes skin color, height, weight, ...

It exists as a social construct.

Typically the race includes variations in hair shape and color, facial features, and other physical characteristics. In the US, race is a variable noted in the documents that officially identify citizens. So any rejection of the "race" variable is nothing more than ridiculous nonsense from lovers of philosophical discussions that deviate from reality.

"So do you think there is more genetic variability between these two penguins… or between Taylor Swift and Kanye West?

The answer is surprising. Even though our eyes tell us one thing, DNA analysis reveals the opposite. These penguins are more different at the DNA level than our two human superstars. It turns out that humans are less genetically diverse than many animals, including chimps.

In fact any two unrelated human beings on the planet are 99.9% identical in their DNA sequence. Only 0.1% varies, and here’s the most important takeaway message from all this. It also happens to be the most replicated finding in the scientific literature on human variation.

Of this 0.1% that varies, almost all of it (95.7% to be exact) is found between individuals within the same race. Despite what our eyes perceive, there is more genetic diversity within a race than between races."

Are You There, Race? It’s Me, DNA

What would you say is Liam Neeson’s race? I ask this question because in this era of the gene, of people swabbing their cheeks to know where their ancestors came from, and of racism glazed over with the shiny patina of science, many people feel confused about race. They have heard that it’s a...

www.mcgill.ca

How Science and Genetics are Reshaping the Race Debate of the 21st Century - Science in the News

by Vivian Chou figures by Daniel Utter Donald Trump’s election as the 45th President of the United States has been marked by the brewing storms of racial conflicts. A rise in racial incidents ensued in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s victory in November 2016. Since the beginning of 2017, over...

sitn.hms.harvard.edu

"The completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 confirmed humans are 99.9% identical at the DNA level and there is no genetic basis for race."

Race and genetics versus ‘race’ in genetics: A systematic review of the use of African ancestry in genetic studies

A review of the medical literature since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 revealed that race, a social construct created to justify slavery, continues to be used as a genetic category, due to a lack of understanding of the continuous ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[SkepticThinker]

It seems that for some reason that no one knows, evolutionists have never placed a photo of an ape next to a photo of a human to notice the differences between the two. Or have they?

They've done much, much more than that. Starting with actually mapping their genomes.

 

[Pogo]

Remember the chicken and egg paradox? It's a very interesting one.

It occurs to me that it would be interesting if some "theorist" of the doctrine of the evolution of species told us if the monkeys lost their tails and became apes, or the apes developed a tail and became monkeys... and which it would be the supposed reason they invent to ensure that.

Ape with a tail,

Denying reality only makes you look stupid.

 

[Eli G]

Evolutionists have convinced themselves that the sum of many tiny changes can turn the ancestor of a crab into the ancestor of a spider.

What they don't realize is that to prove that this really happened they would have to have evidence that there were such ancestors who were slowly turning into crabs or spiders, and for that they need more than just cheap fantasy talk.

 

[Pogo]

Evolutionists have convinced themselves that the sum of many tiny changes can turn the ancestor of a crab into the ancestor of a spider.

What they don't realize is that to prove that this really happened they would have to have evidence that there were such ancestors who were slowly turning into crabs or spiders, and for that they need more than just cheap fantasy talk.

No, it was cousins, them as never came out o da water is the crabs and the uptown ones turned into spiders Starting about 500 million years ago.

 

[Eli G]

"Crabs and spiders are cousins" says a fan of the doctrine of the evolution of species.

And who were the uncles and aunts?

And so it is with everything else... Evolution is the doctrine of uncles and aunts who never existed.

 

[Pogo]

"Crabs and spiders are cousins" says a fan of the doctrine of the evolution of species.

And who were the uncles and aunts?

And so it is with everything else... Evolution is the doctrine of uncles and aunts who never existed.

The brothers and sisters of the parents.
Are you sure you are old enough for this conversation?

 

[The Hammer]

Perhaps so. By the way do today's anthropologists believe there are no races amongst humans?

That's correct we don't believe there are races.

 

[Eli G]

That's correct we don't believe there are races.

You don't ... but there are.

 

[Eli G]

There is a biblical story that informs us of a human agenda that tried to prevent humans from spreading across the earth and concentrating in the same locality, or at least in a centralized manner. The Bible says that God frustrated that attempt by confusing speech...

If humans had not spread to different regions of the planet, races would most likely not have appeared among humans. But just as a garden is more beautiful if it has many flowers with different colors and varieties, so humanity is beautified by the diversity of races.

 

[The Hammer]

You don't ... but there are.

No there really isn't. Thanks for playing.

 

[Eli G]

No there really isn't. Thanks for playing.

Reality shows something different that what you say.

You're very welcome ... to the reality.

 

[The Hammer]

Reality shows something different that what you say.

You're very welcome ... to the reality.

Racism is real, race is not: a philosopher’s perspective

There is no good way to make sense of the category “race” from biological or social perspectives.

theconversation.com

Racism exists. Race does not.

 

[Eli G]

Racism exists. Race does not.

Maybe not in your neighborhood.

 

[The Hammer]

Maybe not in your neighborhood.

"Race, the idea that the human species is divided into distinct groups on the basis of inherited physical and behavioral differences. Genetic studies in the late 20th century refuted the existence of biogenetically distinct races, and scholars now argue that “races” are cultural interventions reflecting specific attitudes and beliefs that were imposed on different populations in the wake of western European conquests beginning in the 15th century."

From the actual encyclopedia:

Race | Definition, Ideologies, Constructions, & Facts | Britannica

Race, the idea that the human species is divided into distinct groups on the basis of inherited physical and behavioral differences. Genetic studies in the late 20th century refuted the existence of biogenetically distinct races, and scholars now argue that ‘races’ are cultural interventions...

www.britannica.com

Facts don't care about feelings lol

 

[Eli G]

Well, theory doesn't always reflect reality. I am a realistic person.

Reality speaks louder than you.

 

[Pogo]

Well, theory doesn't always reflect reality. I am a realistic person.

Reality speaks louder than you.

You owe me a keyboard.

 

[YoursTrue]

I don't always believe what the clergy says. At least in science, peer-review is important for this very reason, and what peer-review is available in churches?

I am not sure where to take this because -- there are obviously so many sects and/or religions. So, because I respect God and what I have learned, I will stop there. (for now) thanks