HerDotness
Lady Babbleon
Its funny that its still being used while most jews completely reject the term.
Also what Levite wrote is spot on.
I agree completely.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Its funny that its still being used while most jews completely reject the term.
Also what Levite wrote is spot on.
Jews also account for more than 20% of Nobel Prize winners.All I said was that they're overrepresented in highly influential areas of society, relative to their numbers, and I provided evidence for that fact. I never made a case for why that may be.
Jews also account for more than 20% of Nobel Prize winners.
This brings us back to the first and third posts in this thread. The question "why".
If you're bothered by this over-representation... why? What menacing and underhanded motives/tactics do you ascribe to this over-representation?
If you're not bothered by it, and genuinely are interested in how minorities can be so successful relative to their number, that's no problem.
But the OP seemed more than willing to make it about "appeasing" those " very powerful" Jews.
There is detected a hint of a very unfounded and irrational fear/hatred of Jews/Judaism, which is what anti-semitism is... Hatred of Jews.
I'm sorry you feel the word is so over-used... and maybe it is. But that shouldn't cause you to dismiss or reject the existence of actual antisemitism.
Fear and hatred are two very different things
Jews also account for more than 20% of Nobel Prize winners.
This brings us back to the first and third posts in this thread. The question "why".
If you're bothered by this over-representation... why? What menacing and underhanded motives/tactics do you ascribe to this over-representation?
If you're not bothered by it, and genuinely are interested in how minorities can be so successful relative to their number, that's no problem.
But the OP seemed more than willing to make it about "appeasing" those " very powerful" Jews.
There is detected a hint of a very unfounded and irrational fear/hatred of Jews/Judaism, which is what anti-semitism is... Hatred of Jews.
I'm sorry you feel the word is so over-used... and maybe it is. But that shouldn't cause you to dismiss or reject the existence of actual antisemitism.
Fully understandable.I'm not really interested in discussing this, ...
Regarding the nobel prize, are the other 80% proportionately represented or not?
Fully understandable.
At the same time, it is little more that antisemitic paranoia to portray the term "Judeo-Christian" as reflecting some sinister attempt by Jews, enabled by their unscupulous wealth and inexplicable control of the media, and supported by their obsequious gentile cohorts, to redact the glorious history of White Anglo-Saxon America.
..., it is little more that antisemitic paranoia to portray the term "Judeo-Christian" as reflecting some sinister attempt by Jews, enabled by their unscupulous wealth and inexplicable control of the media, and supported by their obsequious gentile cohorts, to redact the glorious history of White Anglo-Saxon America.
hehehe... I like the way you put it. Is there not even a shred of truth in such a suggestion?
Its good to see that you exclude American Jews from American history. I think you just summed up your problem.You have to understand that if the assertion in the OP about term "Judeo-Christian" is correct, then it represents an attempt to rewrite the history books to include something that wasn't originally a factor in this country. My family has been in this country a very long time. You can't try to rewrite somebody's history and expect no pushback.
And there you have it friends: antisemitic filth gently offered for your enlightenment and entertainment ... and hardly a swastika in sight.
By the way: this Thursday is Yom HaShoah.
If I had any doubt that the antisemitic label been applied correctly in this case you have certainly cleared it up with this post.hehehe... I like the way you put it. Is there not even a shred of truth in such a suggestion? I'd also say that talking about such fears and suspicions with people of differing backgrounds is far more healthy than bottling them up and just expressing them around people you're comfortable with.
Actually, I think I've clarified a great deal, as have you.You've offered abosulely nothing to this conversation except worthless accusations.
Actually, I think I've clarified a great deal, as have you.
Of course not ...The reality is that I havn't even made a judgement on the issue despite having suspicions.
Jews also account for more than 20% of Nobel Prize winners.
This brings us back to the first and third posts in this thread. The question "why".
If you're bothered by this over-representation... why? What menacing and underhanded motives/tactics do you ascribe to this over-representation?
If you're not bothered by it, and genuinely are interested in how minorities can be so successful relative to their number, that's no problem.
But the OP seemed more than willing to make it about "appeasing" those " very powerful" Jews.
There is detected a hint of a very unfounded and irrational fear/hatred of Jews/Judaism, which is what anti-semitism is... Hatred of Jews.
I'm sorry you feel the word is so over-used... and maybe it is. But that shouldn't cause you to dismiss or reject the existence of actual antisemitism.
Fear and hatred are two very different things
So which is it?Fear and hatred are two very different things