• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Trump About To Blow His Record Of No New Wars?

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
And one thing that's truly scary is that, according to former Representative Joe Scarborough (R- Fla), when Trump was being prepped for the debates by a retired military expert, this latter man said that Trump asked him three times that if we have nuclear weapons why aren't we using them?
This is something that was known at the time of the election.
Tom
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
This is something that was known at the time of the election.
Tom
Yes, and it was before the election that Scarborough said this. Since then, he has left the Republican Party in disgust of Trump and the fact that the vast majority of the Congressional Republicans won't stand up to him unless they decide not to run for reelection.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Why not?
I'm honestly asking, since I know that Iran has motivations but things are rarely quite what they seem.
Tom
Iranians seem a friendly and good people themselves. A fairly safe middle East country for foriegners to visit.

Their govt on the other hand.....

I honestly have mixed feelings about the country.

Best advice all the same, is don't ever **** with a US carrier group.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
For a couple years now, he's been ramping up hostilities with Iran.
And now current events begin to smell like a nascent conflagration.

Saudi oil tankers hit by 'sabotage attack' amid US-Iran tensions
TWO Saudi oil tankers were hit by a "sabotage attack" off the United Arab Emirates, it was announced this morning - as tensions flare between the US and Iran.
The ships were struck off the coast of the port of Fujairah - with one of the tankers due to be loaded with Saudi crude oil bound for the United States.


Iran commander calls U.S. military in Gulf a target not a threat -ISNA
GENEVA, May 12 (Reuters) - A senior Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander said on Sunday the U.S. military presence in the Gulf used to be a serious threat but now represents a target, the Iranian Students' News Agency (ISNA) reported.

The U.S. military has sent forces, including an aircraft carrier and B-52 bombers, to the Middle East in a move that U.S. officials said was made to counter "clear indications" of threats from Iran to American forces in the region.

The USS Abraham Lincoln is replacing another carrier rotated out of the Gulf last month.

"An aircraft carrier that has at least 40 to 50 planes on it and 6,000 forces gathered within it was a serious threat for us in the past but now it is a target and the threats have switched to opportunities," said Amirali Hajizadeh, head of the Guards' aerospace division.
Trade wars are wars, too; but maybe its a defensive trade war?
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Common sense, they stand much more to lose than to gain
Do they?
The USA has been attacking Iran for decades. The Russians are working with Iran, to counter the USA in the middle east oil fields. The USA has imposed big sanctions, reneging on the deal that we forced upon them. And Russia also has nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers to back up Iran.
So, playing ball with Putin and not Trump looks like a totally winning bet for the Iranian government to me.
I'd do it, if I were them.

Help Russia take out Saudi Arabia and Israel, and with them American power in the Gulf oil fields, and Iran wins the game. The USA loses, y-u-u-u-gely.

Actually, Putin's Russia wins. Which is why Putin wanted President Trump.
To.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
It would make Putin very happy. And that will benefit Trump in a myriad of ways. From keeping his secrets to lucrative business dealings to additional help in the next campaign.

I never understood why anybody thought that Trump, with his history of conflict, was the more peaceful option. Among his campaign promises was to start conflicts with everyone from our trading partners to Iran and Cuba. This was in stark contrast to his opponent who helped craft the peace deal with Iran.

I always thought that the reason Putin wanted President Trump was because Putin knew that a divisive, incompetent, and conflict driven POTUS would benefit Russia in the long run.

Tom
A moment of empathy: V. Putin is doing what he's supposed to, and he's got a country that is still reeling from underpopulation due to the wars. Its severely underpopulated. It shares a border with China and Europe, and its got to compete economically with both China and Europe as well as remain prepared for any threats from them. Siberia is a frozen wasteland.

Russia's actions towards Ukraine don't seem smart, but I can understand the cold logic to gain citizens and land (that isn't frozen tundra). Russia plans to hold onto the land it has grabbed from Ukraine and wait out the political effects. What we should do now is leverage that plan and try to get the sanctions lifted at the same time as we work to be better friends with Ukraine as well as Russia. The relationship should become less military and more trade related.

What about the Baltic states? They are in a sticky situation, so we should favor them in trade negotiations.

The business with Enron's gas line in Afhanistan should be repudiated. It was a mistake that should be undone and makes us as stinky if not stinkier than Russia is with its acquisitions. We don't have 'Good guy' status right now because of that embarrassment. The fact is that Trump probably looks representative, and he's a traditionalist bad boy.

Destroy an enemy by turning them into a friend. That's the only way out of this mess.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Destroy an enemy by turning them into a friend. That's the only way out of this mess.
Obama and Clinton tried to do that with Iran.

Trump and his Christian supporters and @Revoltingest promised not to do that. They wanted a war. They traded peace for Trump. They have created another generation or two of enemies in Iran. Right in the heart of the oil fields that they will go to war to protect.

Expect a war. I do.
Tom
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Obama and Clinton tried to do that with Iran.

Trump and his Christian supporters and @Revoltingest promised not to do that. They wanted a war. They traded peace for Trump. They have created another generation or two of enemies in Iran. Right in the heart of the oil fields that they will go to war to protect.

Expect a war. I do.
Tom
Recall this is all baby boomer stuff. In fact they are the generation most tainted by war and infected by it. They are in many ways one of our best generations, but they also have this tendency to leap into battle. Its because of their time and because they have successfully fought truly evil ideals (marxist revolutionary ideas). The communists and the Nazis did nearly destroy western civilization. It was quite close and was a protracted struggle. How could the boomers not be a little bit jumpy after all of that? They are, however, dying. The political makeup of the electorate is changing.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Obama and Clinton tried to do that with Iran.

Trump and his Christian supporters and @Revoltingest promised not to do that. They wanted a war. They traded peace for Trump. They have created another generation or two of enemies in Iran. Right in the heart of the oil fields that they will go to war to protect.

Expect a war. I do.
Tom

War with Iran will make the Iraq war look like a walk in the park.
 
Top