So killing to protect innocent people is worse than victimizing innocent people?
Yes.
It actually is, if it is done in such a way as to spread more hatred and violence.
Such as by building and using drones and other war machines.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So killing to protect innocent people is worse than victimizing innocent people?
Yes.
It actually is, if it is done in such a way as to spread more hatred and violence.
Such as by building and using drones and other war machines.
Yes.
It actually is, if it is done in such a way as to spread more hatred and violence.
Such as by building and using drones and other war machines.
Your post got me thinking... We know Israel sometimes gives Palestinians warnings of some sort before launching a missile. What if instead of previewing with a warning, Israel previewed with an aid drop somewhere close to the target, but out of harm's way. Would it be logistically feasible to do that? That might start winning some good will. (Of course we could do similar as we deal with ISIS.)
How bizarre.
From the article referenced aboveBut what are they really like?
Assymetric warfare is needed.....military intelligence, non-traditional armed forces and strikes, and economic development and education....these last ones must not be underestimated...they are the most important...they will take a long time.....but they're faster and more effective than violence.
Yeah, that sounds about right to me.
Muh nirvana fallacy!
You are probably right... but I still don't think it is defensable to use drones.
And that only furthers radicalism. When it is tribal people versus state-of-the-art drones, one side ends up having to know that their enemies are brutal monsters that must die. And the other side learns that for a fact.
Oh no poor IS. Those poor souls are totally misunderstood.
You know being a pacifist is okay. But you just have to accept that you cant beat someone like IS without military force.
I'm not so sure about that. Nobody outside America views America as uniquely moral.China should be invited and Russia. USA and Israel should stay out of the conflict.
ISIS is consciously fighting to distort and embarrass morality by provoking good people. The people they kill and the atrocities they commit are to goad USA (and by proxy the UN and West) into making questionable moral decisions. It is not about the territory only. The real strength of USA is concepts of morality, and these dudes have actually thought it through and contrived to undermine that.
Moral? I think it is pretty corrupted.I'm not so sure about that. Nobody outside America views America as uniquely moral.
Let me rephrase that. It is modern morality that is being called on the carpet. The goal is to tarnish modern morality, not specifically the USA's reputation. It is to frame modern life as evil specifically to Muslims.I'm not so sure about that. Nobody outside America views America as uniquely moral.