Islam fights free speech

[McBell]

My answer is that a girl becomes a woman when she finishes puberty. There are also no verses that command against marrying a newborn baby either, but do you think that means it's okay to do such a thing?

Perhaps we should consider marrying a nine year olds daughter?

 

[Notanumber]

From the comments section -
"Oh the great Hitch. So sad to listen to him cough and realize it most likely had to do with the disease that took his life so young - He was just starting to fight this evilness. Truly missed and needed. Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a awesome person who is in front of the very needed reformation of islam. That is the future."

 

[The_Fisher_King]

So who is Baphomet?

An Old French corruption of 'Muhammad'...

 

[McBell]

An Old French corruption of 'Muhammad'...

I have heard of it being Arabic and Greek and Latin, but never French.
what is your source?

 

[Notanumber]

This answers many of the questions that have been asked on here.

Has anyone read the book, The People vs Muhammad - Psychological Analysis?

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

This answers many of the questions that have been asked on here.

Has anyone read the book, The People vs Muhammad - Psychological Analysis?

I was watching the video and agreed with him up until he said "there's a lot of Christianphobia right now because you can't even do anything if you're a Christian. And the attack on Christianity is unbelievable especially with this administration in the White House" then I started rolling my eyes because he's substituted his martyr complex from one faith to another. He's using one intolerant Middle Eastern monotheism to argue down another which is asinine.

 

[The_Fisher_King]

I have heard of it being Arabic and Greek and Latin, but never French.
what is your source?

Malcolm Barber, Peter Partner, Oxford English Dictionary

 

[Rival]

Malcolm Barber, Peter Partner, Oxford English Dictionary

Are you not confusing this with 'Mahomet'?

 

[McBell]

Malcolm Barber, Peter Partner, Oxford English Dictionary

No link?
Cause all I can find is a wiki article that starts off stating that the FIRST usage of the word was in July 1098:

Sequenti die aurora apparente, altis vocibus Baphometh invocaverunt; et nos Deum nostrum in cordibus nostris deprecantes, impetum facientes in eos, de muris civitatis omnes expulimus.​

Doesn't look like french to me.....

 

[McBell]

Are you not confusing this with 'Mahomet'?

That would make a lot more sense...

 

[Notanumber]

I was watching the video and agreed with him up until he said "there's a lot of Christianphobia right now because you can't even do anything if you're a Christian. And the attack on Christianity is unbelievable especially with this administration in the White House" then I started rolling my eyes because he's substituted his martyr complex from one faith to another. He's using one intolerant Middle Eastern monotheism to argue down another which is asinine.

Thanks for the feedback, but I guessed he was talking about situations like this

http://www.politifact.com/texas/art...k-obama-hasnt-said-radical-islamic-terrorism/

He was right about islamophobia, the truth being the first victim, Iran, mosques, the Koran and Muhammad.

This is a more passionate ex-Muslim

A thought provoking video

About freedom of speech, etc

 

[Akivah]

I thought the reply of @YmirGF was enough !

1- How much "condemns" suppose to satify anti-Muslims members as @icehorse ?
2-No.
3-No

Thank you for clearly answering.

Regarding #1, typically a condemnation is expected in each thread. You can't reasonably expect a person creating an OP to go back and look for a single post of yours in all the threads to date.

 

[Akivah]

It is about time that Islamists realized that there is a genuine and justifiable fear of Islam. Therefore, it is not irrational.

So why would they think the present modern World is suffering from Islamophobia?

We need to ditch that word anyways. The word 'phobia' implies a mental disorder. But fear of Muslims is a rational fear based on Muslims' predilection to violence, their ties to terrorism, and their discrimination.

 

[YmirGF]

I have heard of it being Arabic and Greek and Latin, but never French.
what is your source?

@FunnyKindOfMormon is actually correct on this one, Mes. If memory serves correct it was fairly common in the early to mid 1800's.

 

[Akivah]

Where did you get that nonsense from?
I have given a list of books banned in certain countries.
My question is simply what is the reason for those books being banned?

Books are banned for a variety of reasons. As you've been told multiple times, we (in America) don't have an absolute freedom of speech. Any country can ban a book that doesn't meet their laws or societal norms.

The issue that you keep avoiding is that while all countries in the world ban certain types of material, only Islamic countries issue death sentences against the banned authors, attempt to assassinate them, or firebomb their publishing houses.

 

[Godobeyer]

Regarding #1, typically a condemnation is expected in each thread. .

No,not in every with every person,depend the person (creator of thread),goal.

I mean:
For someone ignore about Islam maybe,for people used evil generalizing, consider anti-Muslims,double stand about freedom of speech....etc

I condemn his generalizing and his hypocrisy first , then I condemn to others what deserve to be condemned about OP.

 

[Akivah]

No,not in every with every person,depend the person (creator of thread),goal.

Yes, I agree with that. You don't condemn unless you agree with the condemnation. However, you can't reasonably say that you agreed to the condemnation by referring back to a post in a completely different thread. If you want to condemn, then it should be done in the same thread in which you are currently posting.

 

[Godobeyer]

Yes, I agree with that. You don't condemn unless you agree with the condemnation. However, you can't reasonably say that you agreed to the condemnation by referring back to a post in a completely different thread. If you want to condemn, then it should be done in the same thread in which you are currently posting.

Sorry not intentionally delete my post few seconds ago. (to delete the duplicated one).

the condemnation is not satisfy anyone.

I said , it's depend the poster gaol, if he want to understand or being anti-Muslims,so I do condemn the generalizing used in this thread.


I ask you this question to understand me more, hope to get honest answser
Do you condemn "anti-Jewish" threads to satisfy anti-Jewish memeber ?

 

[McBell]

@FunnyKindOfMormon is actually correct on this one, Mes. If memory serves correct it was fairly common in the early to mid 1800's.

1800's?
The term was being used in 1098....

 

[The_Fisher_King]

Are you not confusing this with 'Mahomet'?

That's where Baphomet came from. So, 'Muhammad' became 'Mahomet' became 'Baphomet'.