it doesn't matter copy and paste
what is matter is that true or not
you told me before you can answer what you wish and i will replay with what i want
You may "replay with" whatever you want. It would be nice if you replied at least in plain english
here is the link
NASA - Earth
Lets see ...
You said it would be 71.11 percent.
I replied (with a link) that currently it is 70.8 %.
Then you answered that this would be the same and i should refer to the nasa link (that you have provided now). In that nasa link we read "About 71 percent".
I am sorry but if you want to play such silly games then you should play them in the kindergarten.
70.8 is not 71.11
and "about 71" is not 71.11
And since we are at it ... your selective calculation is not even a proof in any case (even it it were 71.11)
You do what many muslims have done especially since the 70s and 80s when clergy was afraid of muslims leaving islam because they thought it would be outdated.
They selectively searched the scientific theories for points that didn't contradict quranic suras and tried to correlate them. Afterwards they illogically claimed that this scientific knowledge was present in the quran in the first place and could not have been written by an illiterate man 1400 years ago.
They even invited scientists to these workshops in order to give more credibility to their claims. I interviewed several of them and even still have the mail correspondence (which i could even bring hee as evidence). I found not a single one who truly believed that stuff that he supposedly said.
But frankly after some 10 years of stupid discussions with peopole like you that think they know everything while in truth they just copied nonsense from a nonsense site one get's a little bit tired of your lot.
can you please give me a link for what i say before about the bible?
I do not recall claiming that you said something about the bible.
Lets see ... some more nonsense....
some of what you say is in quran like god created earth in 6 days
true
Ask a scientist about it !
No it just states something completely different.... a timespan just a tiny bit longer ....
some things you say is not in quran
Which points do you claim that i have mentioned and that are not in the quran ?
I am curious....
but some thing you say science proof it
everything created in pairs 51:49
science proof that
Really ?
Sorry but science has DISPROOVEN that.
What about this one ? "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cnemidophorus"
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenogenesis"
Is the sun male and the moon female or are there exactly two of each ?
Any chance you realize your mistake and throw your ideas in the trashbin ? Guess no.... As we see you just started spinning the wheel .....
if you have a shoes is left is male and right is female
no but it is pairs
God created shoes as well ?
What do we do with all those poor one legged people ? Discard them as being from hell ?
for example Paramecium it is 1 cell no single male or female
the question how another one come from it?
the answer is with a process called Congugation where 2 stick to get anew 1
Why not generally speak about cells instead of trying to find a loophole ?
Cell division - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nothing needs to "stick" .....
You might want to have a look at
Binary fission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See that ? ONE becomes TWO
also viruses inside it 2 lines contain DNA and RNA they spread then back to make anew 1
DNA and RNA becomes a "pair" all for the sake of saving the appearence.
You see ... all of the above are examples of dishonest interpretation ...
Childish !