Careful with your enthusiasm, your denigrating atheism is not grounded in superior evidence, logic or reasoning. In fact the objective verifiable evidence of the nature of our physical existence offers no support for Theism.
Although the ultimate answer is unprovable, as you stated, and thus my enthusiasm I take issue with your term, denigrate. Atheism is a philosophical position worthy of consideration, one that I held for a long time. I would suggest that in discussion, personal denigration is often a tool of atheists, one I am loathe to employ, and only use in response to continuous ad hominems from a verbally rabid participant.
I again take issue with your contention that my position is not grounded in superior evidence, and the use of true logical thinking. Your statement is an opinion, not a fact. As mine is.
For me, the evidence for a God is compelling, and a logical assessment of it comes to that conclusion.
After countless circular debates with atheists on the issue, this type of debate is is a waste of my time.
I am only in this thread at all because a poster was giving, in my view, a very skewed. and ignorant view of the attributes of God. This is a theological issue, not a philosophical one re the existence of God.
Since this poster had virtually no knowledge of the various theological answers to his observations, I gave him some.
Of course the atheists here, many circling like vultures, seeing a believers post, dropped down and in hoping to have a carcass to feed on, jumped to their inevitable and apparently only feeding mode, prove God exists. When told I had no intention in engaging in that debate, I was bluntly told what I had to prove. When told I had to prove nothing, others in their flock joined the feeding frenzy, to whom I had to waste more time in responding.
