• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israel Palestine Conflict?

1robin

Christian/Baptist
Are we still talking about the Israel and Palestine on this earth ? Or may be you have some secret information from some other planet ? :facepalm:
Good entertainment though...:ignore:
I thought we were. Which part is not a part of your earth history. Israel agreed 100% with the original arrangement in 1948 and the Palestinians refused. Or maybe you think that the Jewish people in 1948 are not descended from the same race of people that lived in Israel approx 4000 years ago. I have no idea what your equivocation is. Israel is the only example of a race of people who exist on the same land, have the same language, and same God they did 3000 years ago (on this earth anyway). I will be out of pocket for a few days (and I am sure that is very dissapointing for you) and will not post but you have a good weekend loveroftruth, maybe spend it on earth history a little. Selah,
 

loverOfTruth

Well-Known Member
I thought we were. Which part is not a part of your earth history. Israel agreed 100% with the original arrangement in 1948 and the Palestinians refused.
Yes, when someone comes and takes your land and tells you that you would get to keep a portion of it, then you go tell the Palestinians that they should have agreed . Please note that Jewish population was only around 5% at the beginning of 1900. Only through mass immigration they are were they are now.

Or maybe you think that the Jewish people in 1948 are not descended from the same race of people that lived in Israel approx 4000 years ago. I have no idea what your equivocation is. Israel is the only example of a race of people who exist on the same land, have the same language, and same God they did 3000 years ago (on this earth anyway). I will be out of pocket for a few days (and I am sure that is very dissapointing for you) and will not post but you have a good weekend loveroftruth, maybe spend it on earth history a little. Selah,

We consider Prophet Adam to be a Muslim just like all the other Prophets - so now you get out of this world and give the Muslim land back :clap
4000 yrs - what a bunch of baloney.
 

Shermana

Heretic
takes your land
Wasn't their land. Jordan at best can be called their land. This is a major problem, people think that the "Mandate of Palestine" belonged to people who later changed their name to "Palestinians" in the 1960s and were mostly the descendents of Syrians and Egyptians and Transjordanians (They called themselves "Southern Syrian Arabs before that time). Jews lived in Judea-Samaria for far longer and had a majority in Jerusalem for most of its history. The grand majority of Arabs who lived in the "Palestine" region under British, Turkish, and even Mameluk and Crusader rule, lived in the Transjordan region. They only emigrated to the "Jewish area" that the Ottoman Turks invited the Jews to settle in chasing after the Jobs and capital they offered.

I should make a whole thread on this.
 
Last edited:

loverOfTruth

Well-Known Member
Wasn't their land. Jordan at best can be called their land. This is a major problem, people think that the "Mandate of Palestine" belonged to people who later changed their name to "Palestinians" in the 1960s and were mostly the descendents of Syrians and Egyptians and Transjordanians (They called themselves "Southern Syrian Arabs before that time). Jews lived in Judea-Samaria for far longer and had a majority in Jerusalem for most of its history. The grand majority of Arabs who lived in the "Palestine" region under British, Turkish, and even Mameluk and Crusader rule, lived in the Transjordan region. They only emigrated to the "Jewish area" that the Ottoman Turks invited the Jews to settle in chasing after the Jobs and capital they offered.

I should make a whole thread on this.

Using biblical names doesn't make it any more historically ancient and accurate. You can play games with the 'name'/'label' all you want but the fact is that British Mandate was to divide the existing land of 'Palestine' and create the new 'Israel'. Also, at the beginning of the 20th century Jewish population in those lands were approximately 5% while the non-Jewish population was 95%. Not only did the mandate give the newly created Israel unfairly higher proportion of the land but also allowed mass immigration of Jews from Europe to the land of Palestine.
 
Last edited:

Shermana

Heretic
Using biblical names doesn't make it any more historically ancient and accurate. You can play games with the 'name'/'label' all you want but the fact is that British Mandate was to divide the existing land of 'Palestine' and create the new 'Israel'. Also, at the beginning of the 20th century Jewish population in those lands were approximately 5% while the non-Jewish population was 95%. Not only did the mandate give the newly created Israel unfairly higher proportion of the land but also allowed mass immigration of Jews from Europe to the land of Palestine.

Ummm, I don't you're remotely close to the same page in addressing what I actually said. Unless you can prove that the Arabs weren't predominantly living in the Transjordan sector of "Palestine" of course.
 
Last edited:

loverOfTruth

Well-Known Member
Ummm, I don't you're remotely close to the same page in addressing what I actually said. Unless you can prove that the Arabs weren't predominantly living in the Transjordan sector of "Palestine" of course.

We are talking about the same thing but if you choose to ignore it - nothing I can do about that.

But anyway let me try to spell it out for you. Your claim(straight from the Zionist playbook) that Jordan is essentially the land of the Palestinians because there might have been more Arabs living in that part of Palestine and the claim that the land west of Jordan River used to be "Jewish area" so Jews have a right to take it from Palestine and make it their own state is ludicrous.

Now let me break all that down for you. British Mandate of 'Palestine' included TransJordan to the east(currently known as Jordan) and Palestine to the West. Now read what the The Balfour Declaration (dated 2 November 1917) stated : "His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object..."[1]

Mark the staggering words - "national home for the Jewish people" was established in "Palestine" - not the other way around. So you can try to twist history all you want - but the internationally known fact is that Israel(the Jewish homeland) was created after dividing the existing Palestine.

Now let me give you a scenario to show how ridiculous your claims are. Hispanics are almost becoming majority in Texas. "The Office of the Texas State Demographer predicts that in 2030 the state will be majority Hispanic." [2]
So you think in about 50 years when the Hispanics are absolute majority in Texas, it will give them the right to bring all their Hispanic brothers/sisters from all over the world and kick the non-Hispanics out of Texas and create a Hispanic state ? Just because a minority community is concentrated in one part of the area of a nation, does not justify that outsiders can come and divide this nation and unfairly give the majority of the land to this minority population.

I think this should have been enough to respond to the false propaganda claims that you brought forth but I will actually go further and show you the numbers as you have asked.

According to Alexander Scholch, Palestine in 1850 had about 350,000 inhabitants, 30% of whom lived in 13 towns; roughly 85% were Muslims, 11% were Christians and 4% Jews. In Jerusalem itself, at that time, there were 1025 Muslim households compared to 630 Jewish households compared to 738 Christian households.[3]

In his paper 'Demography in Israel/Palestine: Trends, Prospects and Policy Implications'[7] Sergio DellaPergola, drawing on the work of Bachi (1975), provides rough estimates of the population of Palestine west of the River Jordan by religion groups. According to that study, in 1890 there were 43,000 Jews compared to 432,000 Muslims West of Jordan River - not to mention that there were more Christians (57,000) than Jews. [3]

"In 1920, the League of Nations' Interim Report on the Civil Administration of Palestine stated that there were hardly 700,000 people living in Palestine:
There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ. Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants. The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years..." [3]

So it is quite clear that before the advent of Zionism in full force, Muslims were majority in all of Palestine and not only in Transjordan.

[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
[2]http://www.bostonreview.net/BR37.1/stephen_ansolabehere_shifting_demographics_hispanics_america.php
[3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Palestine

Peace.
 
Last edited:

1robin

Christian/Baptist
Yes, when someone comes and takes your land and tells you that you would get to keep a portion of it, then you go tell the Palestinians that they should have agreed . Please note that Jewish population was only around 5% at the beginning of 1900. Only through mass immigration they are where they are now.
You mean that when people that owned that land from the 17th century BC until the Muslins invaded in the 7th century AD are told to come back by the people who at that time (1948) controlled the land (Britain) to their own land they should have said no thanks someone moved into our house while were out and they should keep it even though we do not have a home at all. Britain and the UN is who decided to grant them a portion of their own land back, not Israel. Israel was fine with letting some people who had squatted on their land keep a portion of it but the squatters were not.


We consider Prophet Adam to be a Muslim just like all the other Prophets - so now you get out of this world and give the Muslim land back
4000 yrs. - what a bunch of baloney.
I don't. That is not meaningful anyway. I am not sure how you add up the 1700BC to 2000AD but it looks close to 4000 years to most folks. The Arabians came from Ishmael who was specifically denied Israel for his portion of land from God. The Jewish people came from Isaac who was specifically given Israel as his portion. When the sons of Isaac were expelled by force or simply conquered where they were overt 2000 years later, the sons of Ishmael and others took their land and would not allow the true owners a single acre of it back. When the true owners were given a portion of it back by the authorities they were attacked by five nations that had no claim to any of the land. Israel beat all five and combinations of them since then and so now people fire rockets at Jewish children in protest and complain about land they never had any legal title to.

On 14 May 1948, Israel proclaimed its independence. Less than 24 hours later, the regular armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq invaded the country, forcing Israel to defend the sovereignty it had regained in its ancestral homeland. http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Facts About Israel/History/HISTORY- The State of Israel
 
Last edited:

loverOfTruth

Well-Known Member
You mean that when people that owned that land from the 17th century BC until the Muslins invaded in the 7th century AD are told to come back by the people who at that time (1948) controlled the land (Britain) to their own land they should have said no thanks someone moved into our house while were out and they should keep it even though we do not have a home at all. Britain and the UN is who decided to grant them a portion of their own land back, not Israel. Israel was fine with letting some people who had squatted on their land keep a portion of it but the squatters were not.

I don't. That is not meaningful anyway. I am not sure how you add up the 1700BC to 2000AD but it looks close to 4000 years to most folks. The Arabians came from Ishmael who was specifically denied Israel for his portion of land from God. The Jewish people came from Isaac who was specifically given Israel as his portion. When the sons of Isaac were expelled by force or simply conquered where they were overt 2000 years later, the sons of Ishmael and others took their land and would not allow the true owners a single acre of it back. When the true owners were given a portion of it back by the authorities they were attacked by five nations that had no claim to any of the land. Israel beat all five and combinations of them since then and so now people fire rockets at Jewish children in protest and complain about land they never had any legal title to.

On 14 May 1948, Israel proclaimed its independence. Less than 24 hours later, the regular armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq invaded the country, forcing Israel to defend the sovereignty it had regained in its ancestral homeland. http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Facts About Israel/History/HISTORY- The State of Israel

Not interested in wasting time in your repeated lies ....
myth
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Not interested in wasting time in your repeated lies ....
myth

loverOfTruth, you do very little for your credibility by promulgated such consense as ...
1. MYTH: Israel became a nation in 1312 B.C.E., two thousand years before the rise of Islam.

CORRECTON:
Jerusalem never became a nation in 1312 BC. The fact is that the Israelite tribes invaded the land of Canaan in the 13th century BC, settled in the hills, and intermarried with the existing population, thus negating their tribal purity. [ibid]
The 'CORRECTION' is ludicrous, and it's more than a little disturbing to see you uncritically endorsing an argument that predicates nationhood on 'tribal purity.'
 

loverOfTruth

Well-Known Member
loverOfTruth, you do very little for your credibility by promulgated such consense as ...
The 'CORRECTION' is ludicrous, and it's more than a little disturbing to see you uncritically endorsing an argument that predicates nationhood on 'tribal purity.'

I actually gave 1robin his type of response without bothering much about the details;).
 
Top