Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
You really don't want that. Trump is a bumbling, incompetent fool who can't unite Republicans. Pence is not, and he could get support to get things done.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is time to impeach da racists!!
- Thread starter james dixon
- Start date
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
With the standards mentioned above I do not understand how Obama would not qualify for impeachment considerations. In office he has been a notorious racist, profound liar and a complete enemy of federal legal procedure.
Mikail Hakeem
Member
uhm..no
I want it!
Pence wouldn't be taken seriously and it would only increase the mayhem within the right wing party.
Only three more years and we might have Kanye or Oprah lol....
Celebrity contest.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Yes, Conservatives take Pence seriously. He's a paragon of the Religious Right, he has championed their values, and even tried to go against the Supreme Court to prevent same-sex marriage from happening in Indiana. He also tried to flat-out ban Syrian refugees from entering Indiana. If you don't like Trump, you do not want Pence in. The only meaningful difference is Pence is a hot-hotted lunatic who picks fights with people, and the tensions between the US and NK might ease up some if Trump isn't around to bark back at Un's barks. It is reasonable to assume Pence would handle NK as other presidents have sense the Korean War cease fire.
That would pretty much mean the end of America being taken seriously on the international scene.
Shadow Wolf and I both live in Indiana, the state Pence was just governor of.
Believe us when we say: If you aren't a straight white Christian conservative with money, you don't want him in the White House.
Tom
But you're thinking of policies he'd effect in office. Leadership is about
having other countries like & respect us. So what really matters is that
a leader be stable, likeable, respectable, presidential, & mature.
If you perverts have rights taken away, that's acceptable cuz it affects so few.
Akivah
Well-Known Member
.0002 of the number of people that voted for Trump is 12,597 people. Where did the other 62,972,509 people go?
Last edited:
Everyone seems to be missing the point.
Trump is president because Russian and others hacked into our selectorial system manipulating the data. They also flooded our media with “false” accusations of misconduct by Hillary and associates. It was and is being proven to be from foreign sabotage.
Folks, Hillary is going to run again. And when she is elected, she will drain the swamp dry.
In the final count, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote of the 2016 presidential election by nearly three million votes. According to the independent, non-partisan Cook Political Report, Clinton's final tally came in at 65,844,610
...Hillary Clinton 65,844,610
Donald Trump's 62,979,636,
with a difference of 2,864,974.
If the Russians are so skilled, then perhaps they should be choosing our leaders.
Btw, you left out the part that Ivan schemed to run Hillary instead of Bernie because
he could've won, while her loss was guaranteed, despite the polls (which were
hacked in her favor by the Chinese).
Akivah
Well-Known Member
You seem to be missing the point, that straight up vote counts are irrelevant according to the US Constitution for determining who wins a presidential election.
Also, are you admitting that you made a mistake by claiming that Trump's base is 0.02% of the electorate?
Another oft overlooked point is that she had only a plurality, but not
a majority of votes, ie, less than 50% of votes were cast for her.
So the claim that Americastanians chose her is dubious.
5th Amendment: Race No Bar to Vote
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/citc/museum/voting/index.html
The Fifteenth Amendment (Amendment XV) to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal and state governments from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color, or previous condition of servitude". It was ratified on February 3, 1870, as the third and last of the Reconstruction Amendments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Yes, my mistake, Trump's "base" is closer to 0.002%. and falling
-
Akivah
Well-Known Member
In post# 108, you yourself posted Trump's votes at over 62 million. Are you claiming that 62 million is now .00002 of the total US population?
I made no such claim. The post was about trump and Clinton's popular vote not about Trump's "base".
-
Akivah
Well-Known Member
I made no such claim. The post was about trump and Clinton's popular vote not about Trump's "base".
OK, so how does 62 million votes equate to 0.02% of the US voting population?
You really need to do your math notation correctly.Yes, my mistake, Trump's "base" is closer to 0.002%. and falling
Out of a hundred, 2=2.0%
.2% is one tenth of that.
.02% is one tenth of that.
Etc.
Jill Stein has a base larger than .002%
Tom