You do know that here there's no political correctness here.Not really. It's because the UK contains a lot of racists,
Politicians loosen up.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You do know that here there's no political correctness here.Not really. It's because the UK contains a lot of racists,
Sure. Let's take Japan. Pretty distinctIt depends on what one means by culture.
The basic human right to speak one's mindYou do know that here there's no political correctness here.
Politicians loosen up.
Sure. Let's take Japan. Pretty distinct
culture. Way different than, oh, Philippines.
The q is if you see value in nations having
a distinct culture.
No, this is what he said (emphasis mine):I have listened to the minister's speech. He basically said: "we should boost Italy's birth rate, by telling Italians to have children, instead of importing migrants".
Yes they can. If native people either aren't producing replacement level populations, or are moving away at high rates, and demographics are the issue, bringing in immigrants can solve low birth rates and issue with population decline.Also because it's logic, since these migrants won't solve the low birth issue.
Which is a fascist dog whistle. The Italians aren't being replaced.And then he added: "we cannot surrender to the idea of the ethnic replacement".
The kind of rhetoric he was using is reminiscent of "white replacement theory" which was the motive behind the Buffalo shooting. Such ideas produce fear which can lead to violence.
Its fascist theory as in you have shown your support for fascism over and overI'm not familiar with Swedish politics.
I've noticed Americans toss the word
" fascist" about with gay abandon.
Perhaps you could say what is fascist
in this case, so I can see the thought behind
the name calling.
And in general I'd say it's best not to assume
others' motives.
No, this is what he said (emphasis mine):
"We cannot surrender to the idea of ethnic replacement: Italians have fewer children, so let's replace them with someone else. That's not the road to go down,"
Absolutely nothing. They are very good people, most of the times.First, demographic change is natural.
Second, what's wrong with migrants?
Low birth rates depend on the fact that labor market is uncertain and that people are much more selective than the past, when it deals with finding a partner to raise a family with.Yes they can. If native people either aren't producing replacement level populations, or are moving away at high rates, and demographics are the issue, bringing in immigrants can solve low birth rates and issue with population decline.
Which is a fascist dog whistle. The Italians aren't being replaced.
In most African countries it is absolutely normal to say "Africa to Africans only".
I think there's a legitimized doublestandardism.
Which is not the part under contention.Exactly. But prior to that, he said that sentence I posted.
Good. So we agree that using migrants to solve population issues is fine, then.Absolutely nothing. They are very good people, most of the times.
So when birth rates are low, bringing in immigrants is a good idea.Low birth rates depend on the fact that labor market is uncertain and that people are much more selective than the past, when it deals with finding a partner to raise a family with.
For goodness sake.I'm not familiar with Swedish politics.
I've noticed Americans toss the word
" fascist" about with gay abandon.
Perhaps you could say what is fascist
in this case, so I can see the thought behind
the name calling.
And in general I'd say it's best not to assume
others' motives.
South Africa...for instance.That may be so, although it's also true that Africa has a lot of ethnic violence.
If these migrants will be almost all childless...well...no.So when birth rates are low, bringing in immigrants is a good idea.
Are migrants almost all childless?If these migrants will be almost all childless...well...no.
There's that but it's not what I was talking about.From a visual point of view, they look very different than one another.
If you don't want to have a conversation don'tFor goodness sake.
There is absolutely nothing you need to know about Sweden (or any other nation) that would justify them spreading ideas of “ethnic replacement”.
Search on the concept of “ethnic replacement” alone, if you’ve not come across its meaning. It goes really well with the use of other disgusting propaganda phrases like “planned, civil invasion” and “post-Sweden [nation] period”.
As far as the meaning of “fascism” goes; it’s not exactly a relative term. Look it up, please.
No prob., I don't like you either.Its fascist theory as in you have shown your support for fascism over and over
There's that but it's not what I was talking about.
I asked if you recognize any value in distinct cultures.
As for distinct appearance that's a not necessarily.
A lot of Filipinos ( women especially) are readily
mistaken for Chinese, Koreans etc.
Illegal migrants, yes, they are.Are migrants almost all childless?
It has to do with that. I think Britain voted for Brexit because the EU is becoming a very bad place...with all those fascists.
I mean just think of Hungarians, Polish, Romanians, Slovaks, Slovenians.