What does "perfection" mean for the gospel writer?
Thorough, complete, all inclusive.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What does "perfection" mean for the gospel writer?
Since the gospel writer recorded the words of Jesus who used the word which means perfect, complete, lacking nothing in reference to being perfect as the Father in heaven is perfect, then I believe the idea was to display attitudes and behaviors in accordance to God's will and perfectly fulfill the laws of God. Of course no one has lived up to this perfection or completely lived in the Father's will, except Jesus Christ.What does "perfection" mean for the gospel writer?
I don't see it that way.No. they're simply not connected in the way you're using them. In fact, the texts (with the exception, perhaps of the synoptics) are fairly disconnected, and cannot be adequately exegeted together.
Since the gospel writer recorded the words of Jesus who used the word which means perfect, complete, lacking nothing in reference to being perfect as the Father in heaven is perfect, then I believe the idea was to display attitudes and behaviors in accordance to God's will and perfectly fulfill the laws of God. Of course no one has lived up to this perfection or completely lived in the Father's will, except Jesus Christ.
Thank you.Thorough, complete, all inclusive.
No. The gospel writer pretended to record the words of Jesus.Since the gospel writer recorded the words of Jesus
Sucks for you...I don't see it that way.
Ok, I understand that that is your POV and your belief. It's not mine, nor quite a large number of people who follow other faiths, however. Quoting the bible, while important for you, means very little to me as, IMO, the bible was written by men, not God. I hope you can see the difference in that.I am saying nothing more than what the Bible tells us.
God's capabilities are demonstrated in creation....Paul wrote "His invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made.” (Romans 1:20)
No one has to speak for God....he speaks for himself in his written word. All we have to do is read it.
Agreed. As I have said, I find truth in the bible, but one must glean thst truth by reading and actually studying what was written. IE: the sermon on the mount and Matthew Fox has one of the best opinions of those passages.We're likely in agreement re: mysticism, but I figured I'd not reach for the stars in that post, since it would require more than just a brief thought on one verse
Respectfully, please speak for yourself or the group of Christians you have as I don't believe in 'sin'. Given that, 'we' don't all sin. You might think you do but for me, the whole concept is rather something I find to be only something that pertains to your faih.Even when it comes to love, the agape selfless perfect love of God, everyone falls short. I am saying that Jesus encouraged people toward perfection, despite that reality that we all sin and fall short because this gives us an awareness of our inability to keep the law, be sinless, or be perfect on our own and draws us to Him alone who saves and through whom perfection is available.
Consider this: Jehovah created Jesus LONG before the universe, angels, or anything else. Literally, they were together for billions of years working side by side at whatever they did. Then, through Jesus, Jehovah began the creation of angels, the universe, Earth, man, etc. He gave man one rule to follow, and a jealous angel invented religion by telling that first man that what God said isn't true. Man sinned as a result giving us all inherited sin, sickness, ageing and death. God still had purposed Earth to be a paradise filled with perfect humans who would live eternally. In order to regain the path to that purpose, things had to be done that showed Jehovah's love, justice, power, and strength. In proving Satan a liar and redeeming man from that inherited sin, Jehovah and Jesus both sacrificed much. Jehovah sacrificed Jesus, who had always been with him since his creation. Jesus sacrificed much also. How would you feel if you were reviled, beaten, tortured, hung on a torture stake to die a slow, agonizing death? All so that man could get back to perfection and Earth could go on to become a paradise. You think that's not a sacrifice?...but then it says in the bible that on the 3rd day he rose into heaven.
So where the hell is the sacrifice?
One might argue that he sacrificed his earthly body and yet...
"Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak." - Mark 14:38
So god clearly didn't think that much of the flesh to make losing it a sacrifice.
You can refuse all you want but it won't change one single thing.Not my behalf. Even if they believed he existed at all, I would refuse any notion of original sin.
Consider this: the universe constitutes "creation," so God could not have "created" Jesus "long before the universe." Jesus is begotten -- not "created."Consider this: Jehovah created Jesus LONG before the universe, angels, or anything else.
Change what? That you've got it wrong?You can refuse all you want but it won't change one single thing.
Does it? Is that what the biblical writer meant?Why Jesus' sacrifice was done he said, is that everyone who believes in him is saved, which means going to heaven.
...but then it says in the bible that on the 3rd day he rose into heaven.
So where the hell is the sacrifice?
One might argue that he sacrificed his earthly body and yet...
"Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak." - Mark 14:38
So god clearly didn't think that much of the flesh to make losing it a sacrifice.
One reason I'm glad I'm not Christian, is the confusing nature of divinity in Christianity.
Confusing does not necessarily mean bad of course.
It does if it's just masking the fact that the whole setup is a phoney piece of manipulation.
I'm really glad you used "if"