Ivanka Trump LOCK HER UP!

[fantome profane]

So by your logic we can lock up Hillary. Got it.

You can try. But she has now learned how to live in the woods like a wild woman. You will never find her unless she wants to be found.

 

[Shad]

This is breaking news they found out Ivanka Trump was sending 100s of government emails through her personal email like Clinton. They are taking her to court but this time they can get her ,I think she ill be indicted. YAY! This is not Trump its his daughter BWahahaha!

Source is from Washington Post a good source I read it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/

None of it was classified, classified classification was not removed, no private server, no bleaching software, deletions, smashing with hammers nor denials of said conduct. This is just liberal tripe trying to downplay Hillary's illegal conduct by using a false comparison. Hilarious and desperate.

 

[ProveYourFaith]

You can try. But she has now learned how to live in the woods like a wild woman. You will never find her unless she wants to be found.

It will not be easy to track down the wicked witch of the south but if we work together we might.

 

[Shad]

No she didn't she and Comey said she was so stupid she didn't know she was breaking the Law.

Except part of her briefings as SoS are those very laws.

 

[Shaul]

That hypothesis is not supported by the outcome of the recent election, where Dems took the House and lost very little of what they had up for grabs in the Senate.

The number of Democrats gained fewer seats in the House than is average for midterm swings. It is about half the size of the Republican swing in House seats that was in 2010. The Republicans gained two seats in the Senate so far and are expected to gain another in an upcoming runoff election, a gain of three seats. The Democrats lost a lot in the Senate.

 

[Riders]

The number of Democrats gained fewer seats in the House than is average for midterm swings. It is about half the size of the Republican swing in House seats that was in 2010. The Republicans gained two seats in the Senate so far and are expected to gain another in an upcoming runoff election, a gain of three seats. The Democrats lost a lot in the Senate.

The Blue wave of Democrats broke records in gaining seats Dems now have the house and the power of Subpoena and investigation and have broken records for the many seats they took away from Republicans.

The president is screaming foul saying hes angry about the outcome and the votes were not fair Dems unfairly frauded the election because hes pissed off about how many Dems got into the ouse and took over. HAHAHAHA this must be a joke how hillarius

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Guy becomes president and people say he's not bright is that logical?

Considering that he consistently gets things wrong, can't explain things he should know, and has a seemingly inherently troubled relation with the facts it seems a very logical thing to conclude that Trump isn't that bright.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

The Republicans gained two seats in the Senate so far and are expected to gain another in an upcoming runoff election, a gain of three seats. The Democrats lost a lot in the Senate.

If the Reps gain three seats, that means the Dems lost only three seats out of the over 20 seats they had up for grabs. And one of those seats the Reps gained was a very safe seat they only lost due to Donnely running during a time when saying appalling and offensive things lost you an election.

 

[It Aint Necessarily So]

Sounds like our values are the same, I support indentifying and prosecuting criminals no matter who they are and I have said many times on this board that if Trump and any of his officers are found guilty of breaking any U.S. laws then so be it, let them hang- after due process of course.

I didn't describe the investigatory process as a witchunt, I have faith that when all the facts are on the table and in full view of everyone that justice will prevail. I stated before that I actually hoped democrats would do better in mid-terms so they could bring forth all the charges and investigations they wanted so we could get to the bottom of it so this country could hopefully move on either way it turned out.

OK. Good to know.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

I've only seen her giving speeches and in interviews. She certainly seems to be a very "together" young lady.

Goal post shift noted. It's good to see you appreciate someone who can read someone else's words from an autocue competently.

Hey, remember when Obama was the worst person ever because he used autocues? Ain't it funny how the talking points shift.

 

[Shaul]

If the Reps gain three seats, that means the Dems lost only three seats out of the over 20 seats they had up for grabs. And one of those seats the Reps gained was a very safe seat they only lost due to Donnely running during a time when saying appalling and offensive things lost you an election.

Is your standard is that the Republicans didn’t win all the Democrat Senate seats up for election? I doubt that. Most of the Democrat seats up for election were “safe” seats. I don’t know of anybody that expected the Republicans to win in places like say, for example, California. It means that Democrats must try to convince four Republican Senators to vote with them on each and every vote in the Senate. That is a high bar. It all but guarantees that everything that requires “advice and consent” (such as confirmation of judges and cabinet officials and ratification of treaties) will sail through. Think Supreme Court nominees, confirmation of Attorney General Whitaker, and ratification of a revised NAFTA.

The Democrats will now also bear responsibility for governance. Think government shutdown responsibility. Trump can, with help of the Senate, put poison pills in spending bills and blame the Democrats. Imagine the House Democrats trying to spin not putting funding of the border wall in appropriations and forcing a shutdown. They would have to explain to voters, who want the wall funded, why they won’t fund it but would rather shutdown the government. For Democrats gaining the House this year may turn out to be a case of “be careful what you wish for”. Add into the mix that now Trump and the Republicans can use the specter of the unpopular Nancy Pelosi as a symbol for fund raising and get out the votes in 2020.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Maybe paybacks, Robin?

Hey, I didn't blindly believe Hillary and I don't blindly believe Ivanka, so let's and see what may or may not show up. How novel, eh?

Not even payback. I'm just A. sick of the blatant hypocrisy B. sick of the near deification of the Trump family by the Trumpettes and MAGAts

 

[It Aint Necessarily So]

Guy becomes president and people say he's not bright is that logical?

Yes it's logical. I doubt that his presidency is legitimate, and either way, becoming president was the worst mistake of his life. He's likely a career criminal who was used to operating below the radar. Then he put himself and many of the people in his orbit with similar ethics under the microscope - a horrible mistake.

Trump is not a smart man. He doesn't read, his vocabulary is embarrassing, and he seems to have expertise in nothing honest. He has unprotected sex with porn stars. How smart is that?

Edit: I just read this:

"For instance, while touring the devastating California fires yesterday, Trump was asked if seeing the devastation first hand has changed his views on climate change. His response : “No. I want great climate."

Sorry, but that's not a bright man. That's a dim bulb.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Guy becomes president and people say he's not bright is that logical?

Quite the appeal to authority there.

I'll give up Ivanka if we can get rid of Hilldabeast

"Get rid" of her from what, exactly? She's been a private citizen for 2 years now, why are you still so fixated on her?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Is your standard is that the Republicans didn’t win all the Democrat Senate seats up for election? I doubt that. Most of the Democrat seats up for election were “safe” seats. I don’t know of anybody that expected the Republicans to win in places like say, for example, California. It means that Democrats must try to convince four Republican Senators to vote with them on each and every vote in the Senate. That is a high bar. It all but guarantees that everything that requires “advice and consent” (such as confirmation of judges and cabinet officials and ratification of treaties) will sail through. Think Supreme Court nominees, confirmation of Attorney General Whitaker, and ratification of a revised NAFTA.

The Democrats will now also bear responsibility for governance. Think government shutdown responsibility. Trump can, with help of the Senate, put poison pills in spending bills and blame the Democrats. Imagine the House Democrats trying to spin not putting funding of the border wall in appropriations and forcing a shutdown. They would have to explain to voters, who want the wall funded, why they won’t fund it but would rather shutdown the government. For Democrats gaining the House this year may turn out to be a case of “be careful what you wish for”. Add into the mix that now Trump and the Republicans can use the specter of the unpopular Nancy Pelosi as a symbol for fund raising and get out the votes in 2020.

How many voters "want the wall funded"?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Is your standard is that the Republicans didn’t win all the Democrat Senate seats up for election?

It's that they lost the House and barely took anything in the Senate while having significantly less at stake than the Dems.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

https://politics.theonion.com/white-house-security-officials-relieved-ivanka-trump-s-1830572406

 

[Revoltingest]

I.E. "It's different because she's republican."

Looking at the OP, it's equivalent because "Email !".
The desire to attack people personally is a terrible thing.

 

[metis]

No she didn't she and Comey said she was so stupid she didn't know she was breaking the Law.

Then are you going to hold both Ivanka and the Donald to the same standard as both have been using unsecured phones?

 

[metis]

And we found at yesterday that Trump contacted the DoJ and told them to prosecute both Hillary and Comey, which could be an impeachable offense if done. His own staff had to talk him out of it.

When are the Trump supporters realize that this is what dictators and monarchs do, namely go after those who oppose them regardless of what the law is? Because of Trump's autocratic mindset, and because he views the rule of law to be an obstacle, this man is dangerous to our democracy, and this isn't hype as his record is that he not only rarely backs off, he usually attacks more. What else might he do as the pressure on him mounts?

I think things are likely to get far worse, but the one ray of hope is that more Americans are beginning to realize just how dishonest and self-serving this guy is.