wellwisher
Well-Known Member
When the riots first happened; day 1, the Media and Left did not call it an insurrection. It was called the Capital riots. They tried to paint everyone at the Demonstration as rioters, even though most people were peaceful. It seemed more like payback for the Summer of 2020 riots being called riots. It took a few weeks before the meme, "insurrection", was created and then this was repeated again and again, by fake news, until the meme stuck, like a jingle in the heads of the Left. This is why is it good to know and even remember history, and not get sucked into revisionist's history. First impressions tend to be cleaner than mob inductions. As time goes on, revisionist history can take over since the mind wants to embellish.
The late Rush Limbaugh used to do this parody skit, where he would make a recording of the marching orders from the Left Brass, given to fake news and then how a dozen or more media outlets, would all say the very same narrative, right down to the same buzz words du jour. This template was also followed for the Jan 6, riots. I tired to Google how many times the media said the buzz work; insurrection. I remember how fake it sounded in 100 part harmony. I did a Google search to see if anyone did a count, but Google results were overly sanitized to that question. The first page of answers were how Trump was evil, which I did not ask. My guess is 100-1000 times per day for the first few weeks. This may give us a clue to how long it take to program about 90% of the Lefties. Science observations skills also have real world applications.
One of the tricks that was used by the Jan 6 Committee, was to present good facts, but not the whole truth, thereby influencing context. If you leave out data, the curve will change. The new curve will still be made up of facts, but not all the facts. The result of the shifted curve that new curve may have a spin.
For example, has anyone seen the video of Q'anon being led peacefully around the Capital, escorted by Capital police? What caused the dynamics to change from the tour being mutually respectful and peaceful, to violent? If the violence had been already brewing in the Capital, the Capital Police would not being giving a tour. Or if the violence had starting during the tour, they would have had a system wide security alert, and they would have ended the tour. Instead it continued as what appears to be a long leisurely tourist tour. There had to be a tipping point, after that video.
As an analogy, you go to park with your family, so the kids can play ball with their friends and have a family picnic with your wife and smaller child. Everyone at the park knows each other and are planning a relaxing and fun day. All of a sudden, bigger kids appear, who had been drinking and start to bully the smaller kids. Many of the parents go to the field to see what is happening and to try to peacefully restore order. It escalates, due to the rabble rouser teens not wanting to back down. If we start taking a video at the point where the rabble rousers escalate and the parents start to defend, but fail to show the peaceful beginning, one might be convinced these angry parent came for a fight. Fake news can spin.
The video of Q'anon shows a family picnic, so I was curious how this fits into the rabble rousers, and why wasn't that context shown by the Jan 6 committee, if truth was important? There were no serious events earlier at the demonstration, so what cause the crowd to get so ugly?
One video I saw the first week and is now part of the Video given to Tucker Carlson, was a large white male; who looked like a plain clothes cop, trying to incite the crowd, near the Capital. He even gets up high and talks loud to seen and heard. I saw many people, not going along, with some calling him an FBI plant, trying to start trouble.
This person of interest was never interviewed by the Jan 6 committee. His last name is Epp. He was never rounded up or interviewed by the FBI. There are good photos of him but he was not pursued. We may need to interview him, as well as members of the Jan 6 committee, as to why his instigation role was not considered important by the Committee? People with lessor roles were put in jail. Why?
This may be why, the new kill the messenger meme was created, not too long after the videos were given outside the Committee. Once a mob gets going, it is not always clear who is who, especially if one side gets to control the narrative for two years. We need all sides to chime in, and take time to draw the full curve.
Last edited:
