• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

January 6th, Just What Was It?

Colt

Well-Known Member
Still with this? The mob was armed and intent on murder. That fact doesn't go away however inconvenient it may be to insurrection apologists.

He's a propagandist in support of anti-American beliefs and tendencies. He's been a propagandist for Trump and Putin, two antidemocratic, authoritarian strongmen. He's admitted to lying on air. All of that is just fine with MAGA, but not with people who love America and it's Constitution and who respect the rule of law and want criminals brought to justice. If those aren't your principles, then you stand with Trump and Putin, not America.


Yes, in the dungeon manacled to and hanging from a cold, stone wall. Carlson in my head is not having a good time. Think Reek in Game of Thrones if that means anything to you. Nor is the actual Carlson going to enjoy what's coming for him now that he's an admitted propagandist soon to be embroiled in legal difficulties coming from multiple directions. That must feel terrible.

I hear something similar about Trump living rent-free, but this is from people who can't understand how it feels to have Trump in one's mind now. I'm picturing a caged, raging, pacing animal, but one that knows what its fate will be. The Palmer Report is an excellent site to get that schadenfreude itch scratched. They like to focus on what life is like for those in the crosshairs now:

The rioters didn't have guns and they didn't kill anyone. Only an unarmed women was killed by a cop with a gun.

The Jan 6th committee was hiding the Vidos because they present the facts of a conflicting account.
 
Last edited:

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
There is a pay wall on this link, can you get the names of the 5 people who were killed by the rioters on Jan 6 ? thanks
Hey, I'm almost sorry to confuse you with reality, and I feel so bad about this.:tearsofjoy:
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The reason he annoys the Left so much is that he provides balance to their narrative.
No, the reason that the left does not like him is because he keeps making dangerous lies and far too many fools believe him.

Have you heard of the "Tucker Carlson defense"? It describes a defense that FOX News used in a trial against them.. They admitted that so much of what Tucker says is false that no reasonable person would not believe him. That was Carlson's own bosses that made that argument.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
No, the reason that the left does not like him is because he keeps making dangerous lies and far too many fools believe him.

Have you heard of the "Tucker Carlson defense"? It describes a defense that FOX News used in a trial against them.. They admitted that so much of what Tucker says is false that no reasonable person would not believe him. That was Carlson's own bosses that made that argument.
LOL! If she was bluffing then you should have called it by addressing the facts that she presented. By not doing so you only confirm her claim.
She hasn't presented the facts. I asked her how many guns were found on the rioters. Not pocketknives, toenail clippers, but its crickets so far!
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The rioters didn't have guns and they didn't kill anyone. Only an unarmed women was killed by a cop with a gun. The Jan 6th committee was hiding the Vidos because they present the facts of a conflicting account.
You've already said this, it has been rebutted, and rather than address the counterarguments and explain why they can't be correct in your estimation, you just repeat yourself. You're perseverating. It does allow you to ignore what is written to you, but it's not an effective defense, and not a good look. Neither is being an apologist for insurrectionists.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
She hasn't presented the facts. I asked her how many guns were found on the rioters. Not pocketknives, toenail clippers, but it crickets so far!
It was a foolish question. No one claimed that the armed mob had guns when they allowed a woman to be the first to be shot. You really should attack the cowards that you support for that.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
You've already said this, it has been rebutted, and rather than address the counterarguments and explain why they can't be correct in your estimation, you just repeat yourself. You're perseverating. It does allow you to ignore what is written to you, but it's not an effective defense, and not a good look. Neither is being an apologist for insurrectionists.
You should be able to provide a simple number.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
She hasn't presented the facts. I asked her how many guns were found on the rioters. Not pocketknives, toenail clippers, but its crickets so far!
As of 2021, there were at least 3 putsch participants who had been charged with crimes relating to the firearms they were armed with at the Capitol.


... just as one small slice of what went on that day.
 
Top