cbachinger
Peace in wisdom
Hi there! im new and look forward to enlightened debates :d
Just to be clear here, im a spiritual athiest.
After a long religious/spiritual journey, reading books, listening to audio and feeling an unfulfilled space within me, that was finally answered, there is not doubt in my mind that Jesus spend many decades living and preaching in India.
Not only that but as many others have learned themselves, the modern new testament (particularly the gospel of Matthew), had been apparently written by the disciple but over the centuries been rewritten many times to suit the needs of the church.
Jesus's missing years from when he was about 12 years til about 30, is omitted apart from a single sentence in Luke, that millions (including me) accepted without question but today many now wonder: WHY?
There is enough evidence, ranging from physical objects to stories, that prove to openminded people and challenge strict doctrine-led people, that jesus travelled to india via the silk road arrived in Srinagar (a beautiful area of war torn kashmir and is also challenged to be the true 'milk and honey' which moses led the jews to). and actually, jesus said he wanted to unite 'the lost tribes' going as far as india to do so; would this not highlight something important here?
He trained under hindu and buddhist leaders and practiced various arts of healing from nepal down to Orissa in south-east india (where st. thomas is buried to this day). this would support his feelings towards acceptance of most of the world religions. In the hemis monestary in ladakh, nepal, there is a whole archive of information about his life and even a colour portrait which shows a man that is definitely not local and the monks confirm it to be painted 2000 years ago. wouldnt it be great for millions of loyal followers to actually have a good look of this extraordinary man?
He then travelled back to his hometown and the bible continues from there...
And there is lots of evidence to clearly show that jesus do not die on the cross and india as well as other writers will stand by this fact. a person crucified can hang for days but jesus died within 6 or 9 hours, which surprised many and he would not have been the first person to get whipped. what is important to point out and the colour portrait shows this; because jesus travelled on foot a lot, taking on the outdoor elements, he was a strong and sturdy man. his legs were not broken like the 2 criminals next to him and so this allowed him to continue a v v slow rate of breathing, as through his extensive studies would have permitted him to go into a deep state of 'near-death'.
when he appeared to his disciples and said he was hungry; not possible - a resurrected body has no need to eat; ask any expert in this field. he left with his mother, brother thomas (who later died in orissa) and close friend and scribe juda (he was not the betrayer), do the research and youll find that there was another juda (son of the one priest), whose name got switched in order to trick the people.
Mary died in a town named after her in Pakistan - Murree and a man in afghanistan will support this as he insists he has been to her tomb many times. her tomb today is surrounded by a miltary fence. jesus continued on and settled in familiar srinagar where he married and had several children. some say that his tomb is not in srinigar (the tomb of yus asaf) but Aziz Kashmiri will swear on any pile of religious book you give him, that this is jesus' final resting place. locals argue this fact and that having jesus buried here would be an insult to the quran. well the positioning of the building does not support them.
for those of u who 'see', welcome to the light.
Just to be clear here, im a spiritual athiest.
After a long religious/spiritual journey, reading books, listening to audio and feeling an unfulfilled space within me, that was finally answered, there is not doubt in my mind that Jesus spend many decades living and preaching in India.
Not only that but as many others have learned themselves, the modern new testament (particularly the gospel of Matthew), had been apparently written by the disciple but over the centuries been rewritten many times to suit the needs of the church.
Jesus's missing years from when he was about 12 years til about 30, is omitted apart from a single sentence in Luke, that millions (including me) accepted without question but today many now wonder: WHY?
There is enough evidence, ranging from physical objects to stories, that prove to openminded people and challenge strict doctrine-led people, that jesus travelled to india via the silk road arrived in Srinagar (a beautiful area of war torn kashmir and is also challenged to be the true 'milk and honey' which moses led the jews to). and actually, jesus said he wanted to unite 'the lost tribes' going as far as india to do so; would this not highlight something important here?
He trained under hindu and buddhist leaders and practiced various arts of healing from nepal down to Orissa in south-east india (where st. thomas is buried to this day). this would support his feelings towards acceptance of most of the world religions. In the hemis monestary in ladakh, nepal, there is a whole archive of information about his life and even a colour portrait which shows a man that is definitely not local and the monks confirm it to be painted 2000 years ago. wouldnt it be great for millions of loyal followers to actually have a good look of this extraordinary man?
He then travelled back to his hometown and the bible continues from there...
And there is lots of evidence to clearly show that jesus do not die on the cross and india as well as other writers will stand by this fact. a person crucified can hang for days but jesus died within 6 or 9 hours, which surprised many and he would not have been the first person to get whipped. what is important to point out and the colour portrait shows this; because jesus travelled on foot a lot, taking on the outdoor elements, he was a strong and sturdy man. his legs were not broken like the 2 criminals next to him and so this allowed him to continue a v v slow rate of breathing, as through his extensive studies would have permitted him to go into a deep state of 'near-death'.
when he appeared to his disciples and said he was hungry; not possible - a resurrected body has no need to eat; ask any expert in this field. he left with his mother, brother thomas (who later died in orissa) and close friend and scribe juda (he was not the betrayer), do the research and youll find that there was another juda (son of the one priest), whose name got switched in order to trick the people.
Mary died in a town named after her in Pakistan - Murree and a man in afghanistan will support this as he insists he has been to her tomb many times. her tomb today is surrounded by a miltary fence. jesus continued on and settled in familiar srinagar where he married and had several children. some say that his tomb is not in srinigar (the tomb of yus asaf) but Aziz Kashmiri will swear on any pile of religious book you give him, that this is jesus' final resting place. locals argue this fact and that having jesus buried here would be an insult to the quran. well the positioning of the building does not support them.
for those of u who 'see', welcome to the light.