No @Soapy Jesus was evidently NOT...A human Being, like you and any man’?
He didn't have a biological father to start.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No @Soapy Jesus was evidently NOT...A human Being, like you and any man’?
Adam……!No @Soapy Jesus was evidently NOTLIKE ANY OTHER MAN. Everybody knows that.
He didn't have a biological father to start.
THE FLESH IS NOTHING…Well, @Soapy , Adam was created from the soil, but Jesus "emptied himself" and he was born by birth from within the womb of a woman. So, although they were both perfect humans, they are different.
‘The Father SENT HIM…’ from Heaven.. where does scripture show and tell you that?Jesus came from heaven; his Father sent him to come INTO THIS WORLD:
Eli…. Being “SENT INTO THE WORLD’ just means ‘Being made to face SIN, ADVERSITY, OPPOSITION TO TRUTH, PUNISHMENT, PAIN, SUFFERING, and DEATH’.John 1:9 The true light that gives light to every sort of man was about to come into the world.
... or in Jesus' own words:
John 6:16 For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, so that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world for him to judge the world, but for the world to be saved through him.
Eli, ‘LIGHT’ and ‘DARKNESS’ represent ‘TRUTH’ and ‘FALLACY (or Lies)’.18 Whoever exercises faith in him is not to be judged. Whoever does not exercise faith has been judged already, because he has not exercised faith in the name of the only-begotten Son of God. 19 Now this is the basis for judgment: that the light has come into the world, but men have loved the darkness rather than the light, for their works were wicked. 20 For whoever practices vile things hates the light and does not come to the light, so that his works may not be reproved. 21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that his works may be made manifest as having been done in harmony with God.
I added sone tings just before/after you posted.Calm down, @Soapy . I am not Trinitarian.
There is no need to be a Trinitarian to recognize that Jesus existed in heaven before he was born. Only he was not equal to God and furthermore he had an origin, when he was created or begotten as the Only Begotten Son and Firstborn of God.
If you have a problem with Trinitarians, do not project it onto me or any other Jehovah's Witnesses. We believe in Jesus' pre-existence, but we are not trinitarians.
What are you trying to say now???@Soapy Apparently you are used to insulting other believers, but I will forgive you, because I think you are just trying to attack something that you believe is not true. That is why I am sharing with you the sayings of Jesus himself, so that you believe him, not me.
John 7:33 Jesus then said: “I will be with you a little while longer before I go (ὑπάγω) to the One who sent me.
...16:5 But now I am going (ὑπάγω) to the One who sent me; yet not one of you asks me, ‘Where are you going?’
That Greek Verb in red is πέμπω; NO:ἀποστέλλω. Notice also that Jesus says that he is going (ὑπάγω) to where the One who sent him is.
I am not saying anything I didn't tell before ... and it is from the Scriptures. Compare what I just posted with this other post:What are you trying to say now???
...
It is not simply that Jehovah sent Jesus as He sends (ἀποστέλλω) a prophet or apostle. It's more special in the case of Jesus: Jehovah sent (πέμπω) his Son who was at his side to come to a different world.That kind of pre-existence you're talking about is very entertaining, but since you have not provided any evidence that it really is as you say, it doesn't seem more than a pretext created by someone's imagination to twist what Jesus Christ said, but not a reality.
Let's continue analyzing what the Bible says.
John 16:
27(...)
ὑμεῖς ἐμὲ πεφιλήκατε __ you for me had affection
καὶ πεπιστεύκατε __ and you have believed
ὅτι ἐγὼ παρὰ [τοῦ] θεοῦ ἐξῆλθον. __ that I came from the side of God.
28 ἐξῆλθον παρὰ τοῦ πατρὸς __ I came from the side of the Father
καὶ ἐλήλυθα εἰς τὸν κόσμον· __ and have come into the world.
πάλιν ἀφίημι τὸν κόσμον __ Now I am leaving the world
καὶ πορεύομαι πρὸς τὸν πατέρα. __ and am going toward the Father.
It doesn't seem like Jesus is referring to something imaginary like you think, since he says that he is going to return to the place where he came from.
If Jesus was non-existent as you say and he says that he will return to the place where he came from, do you think Jesus is saying that he will return to non-existence?
Which translation are you using brother?In the following dialogue with the Jews, Jesus Christ made it implicit that he had seen Abraham personally.
John 8:56
"Abraham YOUR father rejoiced greatly in the prospect of seeing my day, and he saw it and rejoiced.”
57 Therefore the Jews said to him:
“You are not yet fifty years old, and still you have seen Abraham?”
58 Jesus said to them:
“Most truly I say to YOU, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.”
If Jesus' words are considered true, then we should accept that he taught about his pre-existence before he was born as a human being.
I use the translation I find more accurate and that's why I use a parallel Greek original text to show it ... like in this case:Which translation are you using brother?
Yep. But which translation are you using? Or are you translating it yourself?I use the translation I find more accurate and that's why I use a parallel Greek original text to show it ... like in this case:
John 17:5
καὶ νῦν δόξασόν με σύ, πάτερ, __ So now glorify me, you, Father,
παρὰ σεαυτῷ __ at your side
τῇ δόξῃ ᾗ εἶχον __ with the glory that I had
πρὸ τοῦ τὸν κόσμον εἶναι __ before the world was
παρὰ σοί. __ alongside you.
PS: I am sorry, but I don't even know you, so, I am not your brother. I don't even know if you are one of those who call themselves apes or whatever else. No, we are not brothers.
Sometimes I do.Yep. But which translation are you using? Or are you translating it yourself?
Brother. I am asking for the translation you are using for the exact text you quoted when I responded.Sometimes I do.
Most of the time I use the NWT of Jehovah's Witnesses, in its study edition or the one with references.
An imaginary rendering that his eyes sees because of the tears that smear his vision.Which translation are you using brother?
He won’t answer with credible response as it would speak against him since there is no such rendering.Brother. I am asking for the translation you are using for the exact text you quoted when I responded.
Your quote below. Which translation did this come from? Specifically. I was not asking for a generalization of your method. Hope you understand.
"
John 8:56
"Abraham YOUR father rejoiced greatly in the prospect of seeing my day, and he saw it and rejoiced.”
57 Therefore the Jews said to him:
“You are not yet fifty years old, and still you have seen Abraham?”
58 Jesus said to them:
“Most truly I say to YOU, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.”"
Ha ha ha ha…. Yeah, right!!!I already answered your question.
Then you tell him to choose one of the following options about what Jesus' response was to the question "Have you seen Abraham?"In the following dialogue with the Jews, Jesus Christ made it implicit that he had seen Abraham personally.
John 8:56
"Abraham YOUR father rejoiced greatly in the prospect of seeing my day, and he saw it and rejoiced.”
57 Therefore the Jews said to him:
“You are not yet fifty years old, and still you have seen Abraham?”
58 Jesus said to them:
“Most truly I say to YOU, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.”
If Jesus' words are considered true, then we should accept that he taught about his pre-existence before he was born as a human being.
With all due respect Soapy. My question was to him to understand where he is coming from. And that was the pertinent question. Only after his response to it could one respond to him constructively. If you don't know one's source of knowledge, you cannot respond constructively.An imaginary rendering that his eyes sees because of the tears that smear his vision.