logician
Well-Known Member
a myth it may be but for millions it is an unalterable truth and a way of life and death
Still doesn't make it fact.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
a myth it may be but for millions it is an unalterable truth and a way of life and death
No, He does not describe Himself, the Prophet speaks His Revelation which is limited in its ability to define the indefinable. To assume that language can define the indefinable is not reasonable.
Regards,
Scott
'Jesus revealed himself to his disciples and the text does indicate, he to be one, with the Father...
I was only responding to the " impossibility" of two beings in one and of course in my faith it is three. The Trinity.'
Michel07, If God really is three beings in one, why would he say:
Isaiah 45:5
I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me
andDeuteronomy 6:4
Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:
Notice clearly that there is no 'WE'! There is only ONE God and he is ONE being, not three.
Can't find 'we are thy God' in the Bible anywhere...:sorry1:
The Son of God is NOT God the Son!
And have you stopped to think that since God cannot die, and if Jesus is supposed to be 'God the Son', then entire passages of the New Testament are completely false?
I was only responding to the " impossibility" of two beings in one and of course in my faith it is three. The Trinity.
Yeshua and God are never shown to be one god if you're looking throughout the 4 gospels. I give you that the men who came after Yeshua offering their opinions linked the two in their writings and letters.
Examining what Yeshua said and what his followers thought of him should never lead on to believe he and God are one in the same. This is why when you pointed out them being one I responded thinking you meant that they were one in purpose as shown by John chapter 17.
One in purpose is what he taught and it is exactly what he meant. There is no doubt that Yeshua saw himself separate from his god. There are numerous verses that show this. Some notable ones are surrounding his prayer, crying and begging in the garden before he was taken. His supposed cry on the cross. Even before all that he utters..."my god and your god"....... Additionally, when we read Yeshua's prayer to his god saying "You are the one true god, I am the anointed one whom you have sent".......logically we are drawn to the conclusion that he is not God.
If one does not conclude this by that statement then I believe they misunderstood it. It, by far, is one of the clearest verses given by Yeshua. Mind you....the whole of chapter 17 is nothing more than a prayer from Yeshua to his god and it sets to the tone as to how Yeshua viewed himself in relation to his god as well as his hope that all his followers would share that same connection (oneness). When he says...."I came from heaven, not of my own will, but the will of the one who sent me.... No real interpretation is needed.
If it was an angel that said it one would not conclude that the angel is God.....They would clearly point out that the angel was sent by the will of God. This is the case of Yeshua. John (The Baptist) understood there was a difference when we read him saying "For he is sent by God. He speaks God's words, for God's Spirit is upon him without measure or limit." This view of Yeshua was consistent. Another one of his followers says to him....."But even now I know that God will give you whatever you ask." This same follower also acknowledges his relation to God but she didn't view him as God but rather the son of God....("I have always believed you are the Messiah, the Son of God, the one who has come into the world from God."). This is exactly how Yeshua saw himself ("You are the one true god, I am the Messiah whom you have sent).....
Genesis 1, 26 Then God said; Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.
I guess those are your beliefs.
Yes, but we are not amused. When I say (we)....I mean ME.......because you can't have 1:26 (which would seem to be in the plural tense) without having 1:27 where (Elohim) is viewed in the singular tense...
Gen 1:27
So God (Elohim) created man in his own image, in the image of God (Elohim) created he him; male and female created he them.
The fact you don't understand that is no ones problem but your own.
The fact you don't understand that is no ones problem but your own.
scott you are ignoring most of the old testament where god describes his essence his wants of man and his desires that he wishes man to fulfill.
you are of course ignoring the Christs teachings because you don't believe him to be god
and you must ignore the Quran because it negates your own faith
Ezekiel 39:7 So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel.
Matthew 17:5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.
In the Quran, we read that Allah is Compassionate and Merciful. He is Kind, Loving, and Wise. He is the Creator, the Sustainer, the Healer. He is the One who Guides, the One who Protects, the One who Forgives. There are traditionally ninety nine names, or attributes, that Muslims use to describe Allah's nature.
There are said to be one hundred names of God in the Qur'an but the last one is not revealed. It is reserved until after the revelation of the Qur'an.
Son of God does not mean God the Son.
take it up with a christian Scott you must know they beleive in the trinity
What is the import of your quote from Ezekiel, it certainly has no bearing on your claim.
Regards,
Scott
Show me in the gospels, in the words of Jesus where He claims to BE God. When you've done that, I'll grant your point.
I'm a sola scriptura kinda guy on this particular subject.
Regards,
Scott
good point , but my point is christians prey[sic] to him as God he is their God or part and parcel of their God
And my point is that anyone's mental image of God is their own individual image capable of being grossly mistaken.
An individual's mistake does not bind me or anyone else other than that individual. God is what He is not what you or I or a trinitarian would wish to make Him be. Why don't you get that point?
Regards,
Scott
In the mind of anyman--you or I, is a god. Behind that image is God in His Unknowable Essence. thats your theory
We are supposed to do the best we can, in this life or the next. OK
So, if there is a God is He limited in His essence by what we think He is, or is He independent of our images of Him?
Regards,