It means the Father has always generated the Son...What does that mean?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It means the Father has always generated the Son...What does that mean?
Christians lean on that 'begotten' theology.
Jesus is the Saviour of mankind . Luke 1v77, To give 'knowledge of salvation unto his people 'by the remission of their sins.
Jesus paid the sin-penalty (death) for man so we can enter eternal life IF we accept him as our Saviour.
It means the Father has always generated the Son...
What is that theology? Can it be explained in any way that will make some sense to me? Mr. Emu keeps saying that Jesus is eternally begotten but what does that mean.
Afraid i can not explain 'eternally begotten' to you since that is not biblical. Why don't you ask the person who told you that ? There sure is no explanation in the Bible for such a belief.Yes beta, I understand that this is the Christian belief. I am just trying to understand what it means to be the Son of God, 'eternally begotten'. Nobody is really explaining that to me.
Some christians believe that Jesus has eternally existed , maybe that is what they mean by 'eternally generated ' which also does not make sense.And what does that mean? I would really appreciate extended explanations rather than one sentence answers. How am I expected to understand even a little bit?
Shoghi Effendi also stated that it is a fact that due to the miraculous nature of Jesus' birth that He would only possess the mitochondrial DNA of Mary, His biological mother. However, let us stay reminded that Jesus was a male and it would be biologically impossible unless there was a Y chromosome shared. Though we accept and acknowledge without a doubt the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception and the Sonship or Divinity of Christ Jesus, I find it important to narrate another letter on behalf of the Guardian on this doctrinal issue mirroring Christian theology:"As to the position of Christianity, let it be stated without any hesitation or equivocation that its divine origin is unconditionally acknowledged, that the Sonship and Divinity of Jesus Christ are fearlessly asserted, that the divine inspiration of the Gospel is fully recognized, that the reality of the mystery of the Immaculacy of the Virgin Mary is confessed, and the primacy of Peter, the Prince of the Apostles, is upheld and defended. The Founder of the Christian Faith is designated by Bahá’u’lláh as the “Spirit of God,” is proclaimed as the One Who “appeared out of the breath of the Holy Ghost,” and is even extolled as the “Essence of the Spirit” His mother is described as “that veiled and immortal, that most beauteous, countenance,” and the station of her Son eulogized as a “station which hath been exalted above the imaginings of all that dwell on earth,” whilst Peter is recognized as one whom God has caused “the mysteries of wisdom and of utterance to flow out of his mouth."
All we can know for sure is that it is the Holy Spirit's business. But to be fair, we cannot through rationality or science out of the window when dealing with the Virgin Birth, and it is best to ask questions to better understand the theological dimensions we're dealing with here. When we read "Son of David" being referred to Jesus and when Paul declares Him to be "made in the flesh (seed) of David", we observe the dimensions of the miracle involved."It would be sacrilege for a Bahá'í to believe that the parents of Jesus were illegally married and that the latter was consequently of an illegal union. Such a possibility cannot be even conceived by a believer who recognizes the high station of Mary and the Divine Prophethood of Jesus Christ. It is this same false accusation which the people of His Day attributed to Mary that Bahá'u'lláh indirectly repudiated in the Iqan. The only alternative therefore is to admit that the birth of Jesus has been miraculous. The operation of miracles is not necessarily irrational or illogical. It does by no means constitute a limitation of the Omnipotence of God. The belief in the possibilities of miracles, on the contrary, implies that God's power is beyond any limitation whatsoever. For it is only logical to believe that the Creator, Who is the sole Author of all the laws operating in the universe, is above them and can, therefore, if He deems it necessary, alter them at His Own Will. We, as humans, cannot possibly attempt to read His Mind, and to fully grasp His Wisdom. Mystery is therefore an inseparable part of true religion, and as such, should be recognized by the believers." (From a letter of the Guardian to an individual believer, October 1, 1935) [emphasis mine]
Some christians believe that Jesus has eternally existed , maybe that is what they mean by 'eternally generated ' which also does not make sense.
The Person Jesus did not exist before the virgin Mary conceived him of the Holy Spirit. Neither was God known as ' Father ' in the OT. In the NT God became the Father of his son Jesus.
Are we getting any nearer ? :help:
That is a fairly straightforward statement... If you asking about the intricacies of the process of divine generation, or procession in the case of the Holy Spirit for that matter, I don't know, no one does...And what does that mean?
My apologies...I would really appreciate extended explanations rather than one sentence answers.
In my view of biblical understanding the 'christian' religion or belief is heavily interspersed with error so as to give a distorted picture somewhere along the line. Not until you come to that point (while seeking futher explanations) will you find the misconception and fail to find your way out.Yes, this seems to make much more sense. But is it the general Christian belief?