godnotgod
Thou art That
Rock. Paper. Scissors. Lizard. Spock.
AE. Las Vegas. Elvis. Entertainment. Spectacle. Glitz. Jesus. Nazareth. Greek NT. Smoke and Mirrors. Sleight of Hand. Carnie-Barker.
Suckers!
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Rock. Paper. Scissors. Lizard. Spock.
The mystical Nazorean Essene community at Mt.Carmel claim that Yeshu belonged to their sect, which forbade blood sacrifice. They only believed in spiritual resurrection, as I understand it, and not physical resurrection.
Yeshu was a Jewish mystic.
The Qumran Essenes were an apocalyptic sect.
I think the Mithraic mysteries contained a virgin birth doctrine, as well as did others.
see here:
The Way vs The Church
So anyway, as I was saying before all the smoke and mirrors, the Codex Sinaiticus, one of the Greek texts used as the basis for the NT, is a mess, contrary to the one example page shown by AE . Not so with the Pe****ta copies. Accuracy in the Pe****ta family is over 99.xx%.
Oh Jesus was a MYSTIC. Because of course, those of the Essenes/authors of the DSS who clearly believed in Animal Sacrifice could NOT possibly be mystics.
Accuracy compared to what?
It appears Pe****ta Primacy is basically just like King-James-onlyism, a hostile reaction to manuscript and scholarly evidence of the "perfection" of the NT.
I don't believe they can be, as animal [and human and god] sacrifice as a means of transference and redemption, IMO, is based on superstition. Mystical practices tend to be based on the breath, rather than the blood; on awakening rather than salvation; on insight rather than belief.
I really don't get it. Do get a kick out of being lied to? Does the fact that random websites assert crap really convince you?When Greek New Testaments were going West, Aramaic texts were rapidly proliferating in the East; however, there is a marked contrast between the texts themselves. The Aramaic texts were maintained by scribes who had great reverence for each word, indeed each letter; but the same cannot be said of many Greek translations. No two Greek texts agree to the extent that over 360 Aramaic texts agree within the Pe****ta family. The reader will discover that although the Khabouris Codex contains some minor differences within the Pe****ta family (these differences are well footnoted) its accuracy is breath-taking. The base text is extremely trustworthy and has been reproduced with acute meticulousness for nearly two millennia.
Level TWELVE I'll have you know. And a level 9 mage with an Elven Runestone, the Sword of Destiny, and the Pe****ta Scrolls of Yesteryear.Was he a level 11 spell caster?
AE. Las Vegas. Elvis. Entertainment. Spectacle. Glitz. Jesus. Nazareth. Greek NT. Smoke and Mirrors. Sleight of Hand. Carnie-Barker.
Suckers!
Ah, burning wheat and barley is not superstition of course.
I could find no reference to it as a practice amongst Nazarene Essenes of Mt. Carmel; only this:
http://www.essene.org/Yahowshua_or_Paul.htm
What a riot!
A book on the differences in P is:
The Syriac Language of the Pe****ta and Old Syriac Versions of Matthew ...
By Jan Joosten
A good portion of it is available in Google books. Then there's:
Text, translation, and tradition: studies on the Pe****ta and its use in the Syriac tradition presented to Konrad D. Jenner on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday
The Old Syriac is rejected by Aramaic primacists.
The books are on the Pe****ta. The old syriac manuscripts are different.The Old Syriac is rejected by Aramaic primacists.
The old syriac manuscripts are different.
It doesn't matter. I guess it never really did.
I could find no reference to it as a practice amongst Nazarene Essenes of Mt. Carmel; only this:
http://www.essene.org/Yahowshua_or_Paul.htm
Level TWELVE I'll have you know. And a level 9 mage with an Elven Runestone, the Sword of Destiny, and the Pe****ta Scrolls of Yesteryear.
Then you didn't look very far.
Josephus on Essene Sacrifice | Albert Baumgarten - Academia.edu
But I assume you think that Essene.org has some mystic insight that Josephus didn't have, or that Josephus was bald-faced lying to make the Essenes seem not so bad or something. He says they refrained from Animal, but not grain offerings.