It violates the Due Process and Equal Protection rights of immigrants such as Darweesh and Alshawi.
Why?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It violates the Due Process and Equal Protection rights of immigrants such as Darweesh and Alshawi.
Refugees home is in the US? Don't think so.Their home is in the US. Where are they supposed to go if or until the ban is lifted? It's ludicrous.
Trump didn't ban green card holders either. They just go through a secondary screening.Not at all the same. For one, Obama's "ban" did not affect green card holders.
Sorry, Mr. President: The Obama Administration Did Nothing Similar to Your Immigration Ban
Have any more false equivalencies you'd like to share with the class?
Nope. They're not.Do you think that your borders aren't secured right now?
Not just "not as secured as you'd like them to be", but plain ol' "not secured"?Nope. They're not.
Which like I stated, affects green card holders. Please tell me how is this this is anything like what Obama did again?Trump didn't ban green card holders either. They just go through a secondary screening.
Not just "not as secured as you'd like them to be", but plain ol' "not secured"?
You haven't tried to cross the border lately, have you?
Not whimpering at all. Just kicking ***.
Nope! What you see is what you get! And don't quit your day job. You're not much of a comedian! The tyranny of the left will not be tolerated!So you're a completely different person in real life?
Nope! What you see is what you get! And don't quit your day job. You're not much of a comedian!
The tyranny of the left will not be tolerated!
No, it doesn't.That assumes honest law-abiding people coming in.
I argue upon 8 USC 1182: "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline."So you do not find any of Professor Cole's "personal analysis" on the issue of the Constitutional rights of aliens to be contrary to the Court's holdings, do you?
No one here has denied that the US government lacks the "sovereign power to deport aliens" generally, have they? In what way does "the sovereign power to deport aliens" supposed to relate to Trump's EO?
Are you trying to argue that Trump's EO is constitutional in denying entry to Darweesh, Alshawi and similar immigrants? If so, on what premise do you make that argument?
LOL, the tyrrany of hugs, LOLThe tyranny of the left will not be tolerated!
Guess you haven't been down in the lower Rio Grand area of SW Texas have you.Not just "not as secured as you'd like them to be", but plain ol' "not secured"?
You haven't tried to cross the border lately, have you?
No, it doesn't.
Apparently, you're having trouble understanding the difference between "not secured" and "not as secured as you'd like them to be" too.How do we explain the influx of drugs, guns and illegal immigrants if there aren't holes in our borders security?
Apparently, you're having trouble understanding the difference between "not secured" and "not as secured as you'd like them to be" too.
I respond to people the way they respond to me. If you want less snark, you know what to do.Maybe you could explain the difference to those of us who evidently don't have the capacity to understand 'secured' as you'd like it to be. Maybe explaining your meaning instead of being snide would be a start, yes?