Just stop it guys!

[Demonslayer]

Eh, I've been staying out of this thread, but apparently all these words we use to describe these things are worthless.

Words are worthless, we should all start communication in whale sounds.

EeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIEeeeeeIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

WWWWWWWWwwwwwwooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooOOOO

 

[Unveiled Artist]

What is the difference between "same-sex actions" and "homosexual actions" other than you personal dislike of the phrase "homosexual actions"?

Sheesh. Stop with the insults.

Same-sex actions: intercourse between people of the same gender

Homosexual actions: (OP point) a bias label, defining (above), is intercourse between people of the same gender.

My OP: Stop using "homosexual actions" to define "Same sex actions".

Theme: Homosexuals have nothing to do with intercourse between people of the same gender

It's an incorrect association between the word homosexual and same-sex actions.

They have nothing to do with each other.

The OP is not objective. It is sharing my annoyance of why people put homosexual as an synonym adjective for same-sex actions.

If you have anything deeper to add to this without insulting me, please have a serious conversation.

If you don't like my winning (aka annoyance in my OP) do not reply Unless you have something more productive to add to the conversation.

Read the post.

 

[First Baseman]

Words are worthless, we should all start communication in whale sounds.

EeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIEeeeeeIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

WWWWWWWWwwwwwwooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooOOOO

My whalish might be rusty but I don't like roast cricket dung, either.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

The idea is that the act and the orientation are not necessarily linked, though they obviously very often coexist.

@Mestemia

If you disagree with this, than there is no other way I can phrase it. People have been stating my point for I don't know how many posts now. If you differ than us, please add something productive. If not, please leave the thread alone or talk to someone else.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Same sex actions are actions that occur between people of the same sex, who are not necessarily homosexual.

Homosexual actions could be any actions taken by someone with a homosexual orientation.

Hm. Never thought of it like that. I guess saying homosexual actions point is to identify who made the actions rather than associating the actions with the person's orientation?

How would we define "transgender acts" if comparing with homosexual acts?

 

[First Baseman]

Why don't you ask a transgender?

 

[Demonslayer]

Why don't you ask a transgender?

Are you coming out of the closet, Miss Baseman??

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

Huh? Rephrase?

You are stating that 'same sex actions ' are not homosexual actions. What is that supposed to mean if not gay sex, which is patently a homosexual action?

 

[Unveiled Artist]

You are stating that 'same sex actions ' are not homosexual actions. What is that supposed to mean if not gay sex, which is patently a homosexual action?

Because homosexuality is not an action it's an sexual orientation. So, if I were studying for a speech with my friend, I wouldn't consider that no more than a homosexual action (or same-study action ) than I would same-sex.

Unless you are talking about homosexuals themselves, then I see it. If you are describing same-sex actions as homosexual in nature, than that I disagree. I don't see how homosexual and homosexuality have anything to do with same-sex acts really anymore than my being with a straight guy make my actions a "straight act". I think it's an inaccurate and generalized phrase, really.

Not one to pull my hair over, but one that has more bias in it than describing what some homosexuals do regardless if it's studying or having sex.

 

[First Baseman]

Are you coming out of the closet, Miss Baseman??

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

Because homosexuality is not an action it's an sexual orientation. So, if I were studying for a speech with my friend, I wouldn't consider that no more than a homosexual action (or same-study action ) than I would same-sex.

Unless you are talking about homosexuals themselves, then I see it. If you are describing same-sex actions as homosexual in nature, than that I disagree. I don't see how homosexual and homosexuality have anything to do with same-sex acts really anymore than my being with a straight guy make my actions a "straight act". I think it's an inaccurate and generalized phrase, really.

Not one to pull my hair over, but one that has more bias in it than describing what some homosexuals do regardless if it's studying or having sex.

Wait are you saying gay sex isnt a homosexual action? I don't think anyone in the history of ever has said that studying with same sex people or frankly, doing anything with members of the same sex outside of romantic stuff or, especially, sex, is a 'gay' action.

But cmon now. There is a reason it's called a SEXUAL orientation. If it doesn't define who you like to have sex with then the word is completely pointless.

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

Ok, after I made that post I went and did some things. You know, the things that need doing.

As I was doing these things it dawned on me; What is being suggested here logically leads to the existence of straight-gay sex. The mind boggles.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Wait are you saying gay sex isnt a homosexual action? I don't think anyone in the history of ever has said that studying with same sex people or frankly, doing anything with members of the same sex outside of romantic stuff or, especially, sex, is a 'gay' action.

But cmon now. There is a reason it's called a SEXUAL orientation. If it doesn't define who you like to have sex with then the word is completely pointless.

I'm saying same sex not gay sex is not a homosexual action.

No more than my studying is considered an homosexual action.

Why would you think same-sex action has anything to do with homosexuality and homosexuals?

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Ok, after I made that post I went and did some things. You know, the things that need doing.

As I was doing these things it dawned on me; What is being suggested here logically leads to the existence of straight-gay sex. The mind boggles.

Is there such a thing? I thought sex was sex. If you want to describe the type, maybe do so by adjective.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

I know most of ya'll get my point. Ima beat the dead horse a bit more.

What makes same-sex intercourse a homosexual act?

 

[Acim]

You are stating that 'same sex actions ' are not homosexual actions. What is that supposed to mean if not gay sex, which is patently a homosexual action?

Why wouldn't "gay sex" be bisexual actions as much as "homosexual actions?"

(I'd note that I find it troublesome to say 'gay sex' when 'sex' would suffice. Main point is the actions are all just sexual actions.)

 

[Acim]

I know most of ya'll get my point. Ima beat the dead horse a bit more.

What makes same-sex intercourse a homosexual act?

The bias of individuals who think actions describe who you are. Coupled with the bias that is mono-sexualism.

I actually think its a bit delusional, if not full out madness to view 'reality' this way.

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

I know most of ya'll get my point. Ima beat the dead horse a bit more.

What makes same-sex intercourse a homosexual act?

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Please use commentary. Hate guessing.

If it means something different, what do you think it means?

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

Please use commentary. Hate guessing.

If it means something different, what do you think it means?

You are either trolling or thicker than the earth's crust. Either way, good luck with whatever the heck you are trying to do here, I'm not wasting another second on this.