I was trying to compare why people put my opinions with his. I was told I had the same method of convo, but was never explained how so.
Not for me to say.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was trying to compare why people put my opinions with his. I was told I had the same method of convo, but was never explained how so.
You have your bias, as is shown by your post. I responded with facts as i know them, conveniently omitted from your post
Much of the world did and they have far fewer cases and deaths. Thise that didn't stop for this one virus are suffering and the numbers prove thwy are doing very poorly compared to countries that did shut down.I didn't ignore them. I just said: "The world doesn't stop for one virus no matter how popular it is; so, there's most likely an overlap of multiple conditions dominoing an end of life affect," etc.
Conveniently? Why do you think I would purposely omit something you posted?
How does omitting and not replying to what you posted (if you can find it for me) have anything to do with ignoring what you said?
You lost me again.
You can accuse me of anything you like, but you got to at least quote or put something up so I can refer to what you're talking about. A lot of times I get comments on what I did wrong but never any reference to what it was that "wrong" is referring to.
Does anyone here personally know of someone who died strictly from the covid 19 virus? Be honest....
Does anyone here personally know of someone who died strictly from the covid 19 virus? Be honest....
Much of the world did and they have far fewer cases and deaths. Thise that didn't stop for this one virus are suffering and the numbers prove thwy are doing very poorly compared to countries that did shut down.
I dont think you purposely omitted something i posted i think you purposely omitted facts so my response added them.
Jeez, what makes you think i am a accusing you of anything, there is no need, you post.
Maybe it's just your personality in person, I don't know. I'll say it's a constructive criticism.
I don't remember intentionally ignoring the facts you posted. The more posts about this, the less I remember what you're actually referring to. Do you have a reference post?
That didn't matter much when enacting policy in other countries. They didn't say but, well, or this and that here and there, they shut down. They mandated masks. People stayed home. Today they are doing WAY better than America, who keeps wanting to look at this factor and that variable, one of the mentalities that has lead to America seeing 1000 covid deaths a day.Shrugs. I don't loose sleep over it. My point still stands, though, that there are many factors involved in dying (say in these cases) rather than specific to the virus. It's not meant to downplay the virus's severity. It just means there are multiple factors involved and singling out one out of many (and debating about it) is really unnecessary.
I didn’t say that. Only that I don’t need to personally know of anyone who died to observe my basic ethical responsibilities to greater society.So that's a no then?
That didn't matter much when enacting policy in other countries. They didn't say but, well, or this and that here and there, they shut down. They mandated masks. People stayed home. Today they are doing WAY better than America, who keeps wanting to look at this factor and that variable, one of the mentalities that has lead to America seeing 1000 covid deaths a day.
That didn't matter much when enacting policy in other countries. They didn't say but, well, or this and that here and there, they shut down. They mandated masks. People stayed home. Today they are doing WAY better than America, who keeps wanting to look at this factor and that variable, one of the mentalities that has lead to America seeing 1000 covid deaths a day.
Show me where i brought up masks on this thread and i will show you a post of yours, preceding it.
You keep harping on about negatively to @BSM1 . How many times, it is the other way round. If you are going to continue like this without actually checking then i see no point in continuing
I took it very negatively.
For about the same reason as I would take negatively an OP "Do you actually know anyone who died in a Nazi death camp?" Or "Are you actually related to anyone who died on The Trail of Tears?"
Or, more currently "Do you actually know anybody who was killed by a drunk driver?".
If @BSM1 has a reason for asking the OP that isn't dismissing people's deaths I haven't heard it.
Tom
I've had three test positive in my company. All have recovered.
I didn’t say that. Only that I don’t need to personally know of anyone who died to observe my basic ethical responsibilities to greater society.
Please point out where I have treated you, personally, negatively and/or with disrespect and I will humbly apologize.
No it’s not. It’s a plea for not minimising the deaths of people just because you weren’t personally affected. I don’t need to know anyone who personally died in a car crash in order to follow road safety.So that's still a no to the question posed?
Then what did New Zealand do? Let the virus run free like America? No. They pretty much set the global standard for controlling the spread of a pandemic (and many Kiwis here will eagerly and proudly boast their country's achievements). Shut down. Stay home. Wear a mask and wash your hands when you must leave.So, how to "go backwards" by addressing something we can't control is pretty much a chock.