You'd think you could trust Satanists.I'm certain that my copy of The Satanic Bible that I
lent to a co-worker in 1977 will never be returned.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You'd think you could trust Satanists.I'm certain that my copy of The Satanic Bible that I
lent to a co-worker in 1977 will never be returned.
For sure. It amuses me that there's still people trying to explain it away when it's been documented for decades. Michael Aquino, the founder of the Temple of Set, was also a known Nazi admirer. He was a higher up in the CoS before he started that group. It doesn't seem to end with these people. Very toxic bunch.
Nothing will stop disabled folk from existing they'll be born no matter what and they aren't less then tho some things indeed may be impossible for them to do. My problem is eugenics is slippery. What is deemed better? What is deemed stronger? Many think I shouldn't reproduce cuz of my autism. Ever. I was told as a kid that my genes are poor by a nurse cuz of the Family history of schizophrenia and autism and I should never pass those genes on.
Disabled folk in the past cuz of the idea only the strong should reproduce have been forcabily sterilized against their will and it's still legal to do so in many states. If we should only reproduce with those deem better then certain folks then it also logically follows those who aren't talented and such those who are less then such as the disabled shouldn't reproduce.
One possible reason I could think of is that it's total bollocks based on an extremely bad, counterproductive, and potentially dangerous understanding of the underlying science of genetics.
I had to pause and laugh a little. I wonder how those kids turned out, whatever became of them?George H. W. Bush had a couple of idiot kids.
He wasn't a Satanist...prolly most of us whoYou'd think you could trust Satanists.
We Brits always return borrowed books.He wasn't a Satanist...prolly most of us who
read the book aren't. But he was worse than
a Satanist...he was a Brit (ex-pat in USA).
Those guys are the worst...just ask @oldbadger.
A Brit ex-pat in the middle of America!? The outrage! The inhumanity!He wasn't a Satanist...prolly most of us who
read the book aren't. But he was worse than
a Satanist...he was a Brit (ex-pat in USA).
Those guys are the worst...just ask @oldbadger.
You must be one of the best examples of a Brit.We Brits always return borrowed books.
And the more humane of us never scorn disabilities.
And worse yet....he worked in our defense industry!A Brit ex-pat in the middle of America!? The outrage! The inhumanity!
And worse yet....he worked in our defense industry!
(He was a fellow flight control engineer at Northrop.)
Michael W. Ford's association was with a nexion (name escapes me) which early on was entirely pagan/nature-oriented, very much like my association with the ONA ABG Lodge. Ford distanced himself after everything became fascist and bigoted.LaVeyan Satanism was originally Pantheistic and believed in supernatural magic. Lucifer/Baphomet was chosen as the symbol because of its occult connections to Pantheism and its depiction as a Demiurge, while most occult systems were Panentheistic by contrast.
Those close to LaVey would go on to found the First Church of Satan and the Temple of Set after he began downplaying these elements of his religion for the sake of being more marketable. Modern LaVeyan Satanists outright deny that magic is supernatural or that Satan was ever supposed to be a deity in the Satanic Bible, but if you actually pay attention, the Satanic Bible itself argues against this purely naturalistic interpretation despite claiming to be a "carnal religion."
Michael W Ford essentially rehashes a less rational version of LaVey's Social Darwinism dressed with a total misunderstanding of Hermetic Qabalah from what I've seen. He also has ties to the Neo-Nazi terrorist organization, the Order of Nine Angles.
I'm sorry that this is so negative, but you asked for honest opinions and I don't have very many nice things to say about the works of these two.
The Nazis were absolutely terrible managers. They kept women out of the workforce for ideological reasons, wasted scarce resources and infrastructure on murdering their own civilian population, and even when the war was going absolutely downhill, would rather pursue "miracle" weapons research rather than expanding production of proven but scarce equipment and necessary supplies. There was also endemic corruption at all levels, as cronies were installed in positions of authority and given near-absolute power with minimal oversight due to the Führerprinzip ideology.Nazis were productive but cruel. It is possible for socialism to be productive without being cruel.
Michael W. Ford's association was with a nexion (name escapes me) which early on was entirely pagan/nature-oriented, very much like my association with the ONA ABG Lodge. Ford distanced himself after everything became fascist and bigoted.
MW Ford writes, these days, from an entirely Modern Luciferian perspective, nothing really aligned with LaVeyan Satanism. Dr. Aquino and the Temple of Set opposed the Church of Satan's atheistic views regarding the Prince of Darkness. Most of Aquino's writing during the CoS period came from a very theistic stance.
I have yet to read anything by Michael that pertains to Social Darwinism, maybe you could quote a few?Irrelevant. He still spouts the same Social Darwinist rhetoric to this day. He hasn't changed.
hey you right I wanted honest opinions. I wasn't just looking for positive answersLaVeyan Satanism was originally Pantheistic and believed in supernatural magic. Lucifer/Baphomet was chosen as the symbol because of its occult connections to Pantheism and its depiction as a Demiurge, while most occult systems were Panentheistic by contrast.
Those close to LaVey would go on to found the First Church of Satan and the Temple of Set after he began downplaying these elements of his religion for the sake of being more marketable. Modern LaVeyan Satanists outright deny that magic is supernatural or that Satan was ever supposed to be a deity in the Satanic Bible, but if you actually pay attention, the Satanic Bible itself argues against this purely naturalistic interpretation despite claiming to be a "carnal religion."
Michael W Ford essentially rehashes a less rational version of LaVey's Social Darwinism dressed with a total misunderstanding of Hermetic Qabalah from what I've seen. He also has ties to the Neo-Nazi terrorist organization, the Order of Nine Angles.
I'm sorry that this is so negative, but you asked for honest opinions and I don't have very many nice things to say about the works of these two.
ONA was always a neo-Nazi group that promotes murder. I mean, come on - the year system they use is based from Hitler's birthdate. It was started by David Myatt, an infamous (now former) neo-Nazi who was in Combat 18. It was mostly likely started as a honey trap for violent fanatics, as Myatt most likely has intelligence ties (his bizarre biography fits the mold of a spook). Whether Ford himself personally held neo-Nazi views, I don't know, but that doesn't make him look innocent, for sure.Michael W. Ford's association was with a nexion (name escapes me) which early on was entirely pagan/nature-oriented, very much like my association with the ONA ABG Lodge. Ford distanced himself after everything became fascist and bigoted.
MW Ford writes, these days, from an entirely Modern Luciferian perspective, nothing really aligned with LaVeyan Satanism. Dr. Aquino and the Temple of Set opposed the Church of Satan's atheistic views regarding the Prince of Darkness. Most of Aquino's writing during the CoS period came from a very theistic stance.
You're wrong. First off, ONA is different than O9A. The O9A are factions that do not follow the Sinister Protocol of the Order of Nine Angles. It is with the O9A where you find the racist, bigotry, and criminal activity. The ONA has nexions of which many are simply nature-based neopagan groups, like the one I used to be associated with ABG Lodge.ONA was always a neo-Nazi group that promotes murder. I mean, come on - the year system they use is based from Hitler's birthdate. It was started by David Myatt, an infamous (now former) neo-Nazi who was in Combat 18. It was mostly likely started as a honey trap for violent fanatics, as Myatt most likely has intelligence ties (his bizarre biography fits the mold of a spook). Whether Ford himself personally held neo-Nazi views, I don't know, but that doesn't make him look innocent, for sure.