Looks to me like Watchtower is afraid of the light.To keep them fearful is to keep them dependent.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Looks to me like Watchtower is afraid of the light.To keep them fearful is to keep them dependent.
You guys are ridiculous, imagine how Jehovah's Witnesses would be treated in Iran, have you heard of how the Bahai are treated, Kolibri is not making this up, there are definitely places in the world were professing to be a JW can get you locked up.
Great! More proof Jesus never commanded the making of disciples. (Kolibri just said that some people should not be made into disciples and that is correct imho.)The world is very much an well-traveled place now. In many seaports there are efforts to reach people from other lands with the good news. And that work has been very successful. However, if I continued speaking with someone that does not already profess Christianity when they went back to India, that would be a problem. If I continued being free with my witnessing to someone that has gone back to Iran or North Korea, or mainland China, I could disturb the safeguards set in place in those locations. People get excited about new things. They usually do not know yet when to be quiet or how to be tactful. Setting off a new preacher of the good news in a area where the work is underground is both harmful to the new student and to others that live in the community that have learned to be discreet.
I light of this article Question Box — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY I will be leaving RF within the next few days. The direction given is put in bold print and the reasons given are solid ones.
I can reason that blocking from sight the posts from those disfellowshipped to protect their social vacuum (so as to not undermine Jehovah's loving discipline for them) as one way to comply w/o leaving RF. (1 Corinthians 5:5; 1 Timothy 1:20) I can also see blocking those determined to destroy my precious faith - especially those that left us because they were 'not of our sort' as a means to that end as well. (1 John 2:19)
However, If I died today, could my tombstone truthfully say:
He did not associate with deceitful men,
And he avoided those who hide what they are.
(Psalms 26:4)
We are reminded at 1 Corinthians 1:26 that among true Christians there are "not many wise by human standards". (footnote) Do I see myself above being duped by someone that sees themselves as the cat in a cat and mouse game? Have I ever felt like someone was stringing me along to see how long they can get me to talk with them when they know it would damage my relationship with Jehovah to do so?
I have also been considering 2 Timothy 2:23-26.
"Further, reject foolish and ignorant debates, knowing that they produce fights. For a slave of the Lord does not need to fight, but needs to be gentle toward all...."
Before considering the linked article I had already decided that I needed to further refine how and where I would post here. Some threads have lived too long and I had a share in keeping them alive.
Where there is no wood, the fire goes out,
And where there is no slanderer, quarreling ceases.
- Proverbs 26:20
[Avoid] the scornful man,
And contention will disappear;
Disputes and insults will cease.
- Proverbs 22:10
What brought me to the conclusion that I need to set a time limit and leave RF instead of just modifying my use of it was the part in the article just prior to the bold printed direction. The RF is not country specific. Can I say I am not seeking out people physically located in countries where online communication is monitored by hostile local authorities? Do I want to be responsible for those hostile authorities to use something I posted to fuel their hatred for Jehovah's pure worship and give them their excuse ramp up their acts of intolerance?
I've posted this in both under Religious Debate for everyone to see today, and in the Jehovah's Witnesses DIR so that it won't disappear quickly as not many new threads are opened there.
I'm confused. I though the bible says in several places that the faithful will be protected.
Well I suppose that's one interpretation. As for myself, I'm always skeptical of those who would say that there is information available which should not be accessed. It seems to me that the church has more to gain from you cloistering yourself away from something you might learn than it has repercussions to fear from something you might teach.Yes, as a nation they will be protected but individual members may die faithfully and be protected in God's memory till the resurrection.
"In fact, all those desiring to live with godly devotion in association with Christ Jesus will be persecuted."
- 2 Timothy 3:12
"Then people will hand you over to tribulation and will kill you, and you will be hated by all the nations on account of my name."
- Matthew 24:9
"Men will expel you from the synagogue. In fact, the hour is coming when everyone that kills you will think he has offered a sacred service to God."
- John 16:2
When the cry of "Peace and Security" is followed by "sudden destruction" it will be time for Christ's true disciples to "stand up straight and lift up [our] head, because [our] deliverance is getting near." (Luke 21:28) Even so we are told:
Go, my people, enter your inner rooms,
And shut the doors behind you.
Hide yourself for a brief moment
Until the wrath (or "denunciation.") has passed by.
- Isaiah 26:20
Obedience to whatever this divine direction involves will mean our very lives.
Well I suppose that's one interpretation. As for myself, I'm always skeptical of those who would say that there is information available which should not be accessed. It seems to me that the church has more to gain from you cloistering yourself away from something you might learn than it has repercussions to fear from something you might teach.
You are saying the Jehovah's Witness "good news" must be kept secret from some people because why? Matthew 10:28 I hear you say the Watchtower information is dangerous and I agree with you!I suppose it has to do with the intent and the direction of the information flow. Lets take this a little farther. Suppose I witnessed to someone that lives in a land where Jehovah's Witnesses are under ban while they are visiting the United States. Am I going to hear something I should not hear while they are in my own country of residence? No. Information exchange between myself and this individual is completely legal and unprosecuted where I live.
Now lets say they go back to their home country. There are no Kingdom Halls (buildings dedicated as houses of worship by Jehovah's Witnesses). The work is underground. Suppose now a local brother has arranged to contact this individual to cultivate interest, and the interested person e-mails me that brother's name or other identifying information? Now through data mining for specific words common to our religious vocabulary, the government gets that particular e-mail flagged for scrutiny. Now a government may have learned something about the local brothers it did not know before and may have a new target of focus.
Did I learn anything I was not supposed to? No. Did the interested person? No. Did a mal-intended third party learn something? Yes.
Personally, I don't think they fear you hearing anything from other JW's. Religion is on the decline in many parts of the world. It's been suggested that the Internet may well prove to be the death of religion. I don't doubt that many religions find themselves in Self defense territory. I think the JWs have nothing to fear in you though. You seem well insulated from anything that might make you question.I suppose it has to do with the intent and the direction of the information flow. Lets take this a little farther. Suppose I witnessed to someone that lives in a land where Jehovah's Witnesses are under ban while they are visiting the United States. Am I going to hear something I should not hear while they are in my own country of residence? No. Information exchange between myself and this individual is completely legal and unprosecuted where I live.
Now lets say they go back to their home country. There are no Kingdom Halls (buildings dedicated as houses of worship by Jehovah's Witnesses). The work is underground. Suppose now a local brother has arranged to contact this individual to cultivate interest, and the interested person e-mails me that brother's name or other identifying information. Now through data mining for specific words common to our religious vocabulary, the government gets that particular e-mail flagged for scrutiny. Now the government may have learned something about the local brothers it did not know before and may have a new target of focus.
Did I learn anything I was not supposed to? No. Did the interested person? No. Did a mal-intended third party learn something? Yes.
lol.You seem well insulated from anything that might make you question.
So are you saying, Kolibri, that it is the Watchtower's position that Jehovah's Witnesses should not be involved in forums such as RF? That's what I got out the article.
(By the way, I'll miss you. I never found you overbearing and I always enjoyed our conversations.)
The direction in bold was regarding the physical location of the person I am witnessing too in relation to myself. I can just as easily come across the same information from people physically located within my own country of residence if I chose too.
I find this to be not a matter of what is a huge problem now as a problem regarding what is soon to be.
We know that soon people will get swept away in believing a significant cry of "Peace and Security" and that shortly after the world's governments will turn on organized religion so intensely and completely that it will seem as if "no flesh will be saved." (1 Thessalonians 5:1-5; Matthew 24:21-22; Revelations 18:21-23) The scene of this world is soon to change.
I am not responding out of dread, but out of faith. The direction is made to protect the interests of my brothers and sisters that live in other lands. I find that request reasonable.
I find this very confusing, and I do think that it is an unfounded fear in the majority of situations.
Regardless, I respect your decision Kolibri (and you decision as well JayJayDee).
Peace to you, you will be missed.
There are many, many avenues of recommended ways of reaching people with "the good news of the kingdom". Besides the door-to-door canvasing there is airport witnessing, harbor witnessing, street witnessing, some of this is done with eye catching carts. Some are involved in group bible studies in nursing homes. Others respond to requests made by prison inmates. There is also letter writing or telephone witnessing - especially to those that live behind gated communities or are consistently not at home. Often there are foreign language communities within our locale including those limited to braille or using sign language to communicate.
There is plenty to keep us busy. For some of us the have been posting in these types of forums, our real-life situations have been somewhat limited. Both JayJayDee and myself are caregivers. We have a lot of time on our hands where we are only busy being available for the needs of those we care for. We want to speak about our hope, and it has been much easier for me to comment and respond here than it has been to organize myself to write letters and make phone calls. Being challenged here in some regards has also helped me do deeper research into how to explain why I believe as I do - the evidence that convinces me that what i have is based on reality.
So while this will be a change, it will cause me to break out of my laziness and working more closely with those who can preach extensively locally. I will suffer no loss by following direction. You may see me in and out of threads still for a few more days. I've set Friday as my cut-off date.