Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Good to not be a member of your group.We don't know, obviously.
In my opinion it is a mark of stupidity to try to force a dogmatic answer to a question about which we don't have enough information.
Here is some light reading for you, pun intended. Tired Light Denies the Big Bang
Abstract
More and more problems related to Big Bang have been appeared in recent years. All the problems are due to the Doppler interpretation of redshift. The “tired light” theory, proposed in 1929 by Zwicky and most recently developed by Shao in 2013, gives a new explanation for redshift. The theory has shown that the redshift is induced from the energy loss of photons by the interaction with material particles on their journey through cosmological space. The basic principles related to the energy transfer are mainly the mass-energy equivalence and the Lorentz theory. Problems, such as super velocity, the horizon problem, the cosmological microwave background radiation, and Olbers’ paradox, vanish in the cosmological model of “tired light” theory. The model describes a boundless and timeless Cosmos.
And now please read this if you are serious.
James Webb telescope findings could mean our understanding of the Big Bang is fundamentally wrong
Think about it, the JWST viewed relevant Galaxies' redshift, treated as doppler, is showing that they are relatively near to the BB in time, but the BBT model says that Galaxies should not be as mature as these are for that time. However, if we treat the redshift as distance, it is consistent with the TLT SSM theory, for if the Galaxies are further away, which they are as they were not visible with HST, then they would be fully formed such as our Milky Way Galaxy, which apparently they are.
Do you understand the significance of what I'm saying?
TLT Tired Light Theory, SSM Steady State Model, HST Hubble Space Telescope
Last edited: