sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Numerous, previous postings from him, but in this case the mocking of a well established Biblical position that man is born into sin.May I ask what leads you to this conclusion?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Numerous, previous postings from him, but in this case the mocking of a well established Biblical position that man is born into sin.May I ask what leads you to this conclusion?
So, then, a fetus has no special value over and above that of the sperm cell that fertilized it?In that souls enter into an egg through the father, yes.
Psalm 51:5
Surely I was sinful at birth,
sinful from the time my mother conceived me.
In that souls enter into an egg through the father, yes.
Numerous, previous postings from him, but in this case the mocking of a well established Biblical position that man is born into sin.
Um...In that souls enter into an egg through the father, yes.
Numerous, previous postings from him, but in this case the mocking of a well established Biblical position that man is born into sin.
Sandy said:"And all the souls that came out of the loins of Jacob were seventy souls..." Exodus 2:5 They were souls before they were even impregnated into their mother.
Why would you say that?So, then, a fetus has no special value over and above that of the sperm cell that fertilized it?
Certainly not...no levity allowed...serious...ummmmm...I can't keep a straight face. I'm lying out my as(conection terminated).From what I can see (and forgive me if I am wrong) angellous_evangellous has Christian as his religion, but I just saw the (Full of Sin - Whoot!) post as having some fun. And being religious doesn't mean we can't have a laugh, does it?
I suppose it could be an idiom but I just read it the way it was wrote.Don't you think you are taking the passage a little too literally?
If a sperm cell has a human soul and a fertilized egg has a human soul, then what's the net change from one to the other?Why would you say that?
Complete DNA.If a sperm cell has a human soul and a fertilized egg has a human soul, then what's the net change from one to the other?
That's not a net change either; there's no more DNA in the fertilized egg than there was in the egg and sperm separately beforehand.Complete DNA.
Sandy said:I suppose it could be an idiom but I just read it the way it was wrote.
That's not what you asked.That's not a net change either; there's no more DNA in the fertilized egg than there was in the egg and sperm separately beforehand.
I asked what the net change was. Anything that was there beforehand and is still there afterward is not a net change.That's not what you asked.
Is there any biblical basis for the claim that life begins at conception?
Really?There are several scriptures that indicate that God knows that life begins at conception
These verses have absolutely nothing to do with conception.Ps 139:13-16.
This says nothing about how life begins at conception.Consider how God spoke about Jeremiah when he was in his mothers belly, Jere 1:4,5.
No it isn't.Proof positive iis found at Ex 21:22,23.
Yet is says ABSOLUTELY nothing about when that life began...We are toold that if two men were fighting and they caused the death of a baby by premature birth, the man responsilbe should be put to death. The Mosaic Law required a life for a life.
the verses listed here in this particular quote bubble, though they do tend to support the claims in that particular quote bubble, have absolutely nothing to say about life beginning at conception.Think about Jesus, who was transferred to the womb of Mary, by God. This is a very good indication that life begins in the womb for mankind. Of course Jesus was alive in heaven billions of years before he came to earth, Luke 1:32-35, Col 1:15, Rev 3:14, Prov 8:22-31.