Pogo
Well-Known Member
This is your same bad argument that we used to do it so it should be ok.Absolutely… that is what I mean by “modern interpretation” but not based on precedent. (Like unto the abortion issue - not making this an issue but simply using it as an example which the Court had to undo).
Back on the subject - in the 1960’s a shift happened, not on precedent, but a new interpretation of separation of church and state to read “freedom from religion” instead of “freedom of religion” - reversing almost 200 years of the foundation of what it meant.
But, again, to show that it is not what it is today:
Pennsylvania:
Text of Preamble:
WE, the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
Delaware:
PREAMBLE
Through Divine goodness, all people have by nature the rights of worshiping and serving their Creator according to the dictates of their consciences, of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring and protecting reputation and property, and in general of obtaining objects suitable to their condition, without injury by one to another; and as these rights are essential to their welfare, for due exercise thereof, power is inherent in them; and therefore all just authority in the institutions of political society is derived from the people, and established with their consent, to advance their happiness; and they may for this end, as circumstances require, from time to time, alter their Constitution of government.
New York
Text of Preamble:
We The People of the State of New York, grateful to Almighty God for our Freedom, in order to secure its blessings, DO ESTABLISH THIS CONSTITUTION.[1]
Virginia:
Whereas, the delegates and representatives of the good people of Virginia, in convention assembled, on the twenty-ninth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and seventy-six, reciting and declaring that...
… We, therefore, the delegates of the good people of Virginia, elected and in convention assembled, in pursuance of said acts, invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do propose to the people the following constitution and form of government for this commonwealth:
And so forth and so on for all states.
God, Year of Our Lord, Almighty God, His guidance, Divine Goodness… and so much more...
Obviously, “separation FROM religion” was not on their mind. Today viewpoint is out of context and in error.
How many years passed before the 10 Commandments were removed?
Just because the majority of immigrants to this country where Christian in the past and never considered other religions does not make that a reason for lack of consideration in a more multi-cultural country.
Nobody is telling you you can't be religious, only that no one religion gets pride of place.
The US was founded on the idea of keeping government out of religion to avoid religious wars in fact if you go back just a little further in your history.