Nothing...because they're speechless during a swoon?Yeah right... You know what they say about muscled men?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nothing...because they're speechless during a swoon?Yeah right... You know what they say about muscled men?
Please show me where i said annoyed, i have been back 3 pages and can only assume you are confusing me with Audie.
And there you go again painting me with your imagination
Wow. Christine. Did I trigger something?
No, were you trying and failing?
Can you show me where i said annoyed or not.
Probably not. It's not a debate (least that's what I thought?). I can't hear your tone of voice. Maybe changing your statements and questions to be less commands and more introspective will help not get that type of response from people.
'not sure of your personality in person, but it's constructive criticism whether you agree to it or not.
So posting a thread in "general debates" is not supposed to be debated. Wow, is that one of your not dictionary meanings?
So still no evidence that i said annoyed. So instead poke personal queries instead. So do you often make accusations you can't back up?
And you seem to be confused about the meaning of projection.
Probably not.
I can't hear your tone of voice. Maybe changing your statements and questions to be less commands and more introspective will help not get that type of response from people.
Debating and arguing are two different things.
Yes. And the more I'm talking, the more I'm forgetting what I'm trying to understand. I'm waiting for @Ausie to explain it (if that's her choice).
You'd never say that to Conan.
You'd be too busy swooning.
Whatever turns you on, toots.conan is a big sissie
Maybe not dictating what emotions people have would ensure a less confrontational discussion
Someone needs to explain it
I acknowledge your (context) your concern. I looked all the posts you and Assui posted and only can come up with 1. saying that people internalize hate based on lack of forgiveness and 2. saying this isn't personal.
Maybe it's the generalization?
Clarifying what Fool said (he didn't correct me)
I have no clue.
I can't defend my views if I don't understand what you're talking about to form an opinion about it. All I read is "you did this..." it's not productive.
Convenient eh?
One last time, are you going to validate your claim that I said i was annoyed or do we leave it open
Probably not.
Don't wait too long. Your tone is stronger than your words. It's constructive criticism. Whether you believe me or not is irrelevant.
Very convenient to you but never mine, there is no point, you define my emotions to suite youeself and ignored reality. I wonder what the reason is for that.
Ok so you cannot justify your claim so pretend you never made the claim. You do realise most people would honestly admit their error. Perhaps you dont, i don't know.
I hope you're not like this in person
How did I define your emotions?
You are taking offense at something
I cannot defend.
I said "probably not".
The point still stands. Your tone is accusative.
Read your own posts.
The point is you made a false accusation against me, you know you cannot defend it and you will not admit your error . How do you want my tone to sound?
Least you clarified what you have an issue with in one short post. That. I appreciate.
1. How did I made an accusation against "you" personally?
The posts you listed 218 or something else did not mention you
2. You'd have to clarify the error. I can't find any "you-statement" anywhere
3. Thanks for acknowledging your tone. I can't find another word at he moment but annoyed. The context is the same regardless the word.
You stated that i said i was "annoyed" you know this very well and have done all you can to avoid the consciquences of your error, i am done with you, welcome to my ignore list
Christine. You used the word "annoyed" in your post. I'm acknowledging your emotions, and replying to it. Having feelings of frustration, annoyance, Whatever, is natural when you're trying to get a point across and the other isn't getting it. It's human.
Do you believe you can love your enemies?
If so, would it make sense to call the person you love an enemy?
Love your enemies means for example loving (and forgiving) Hitler.
Do you love your enemies?