As you already should know, those rules were created by the Republicans. So I'm not sure why they're (and you're) whining about them now.
Man you really are a propaganda spreader. The republicans would not complain about being given less time, less call for witnesses if they made the rules. And adam shift is the chairman, not the republicans. Common sense! And why would they make rules that hurt fairness for themselves? MORE common sense!
I haven't made anything up. Nunes, Jordan and Stefanik have tried to speak out of turn several times throughout these hearings. I guess you missed it.
Quit making **** up. Your a lier! They spoke well within there turn. Adam shift interrupted. Actually, when adam got called on it, he backpeddled and changed his verdict too! Why? Because he knew he was wrong!
Adam Schiff is the Chair of the committee and is authorized to speak over those who are in not speaking in their proper turn. Somebody has to keep order; that's his job.
Stop with the lying. Its not cool at all. And it tells me you dont give a **** about facts or truth.
It's not a straw man, and that claim doesn't even make sense.
Yes it is a strawman and yes it does make sense. Only you make no sense.
You should read through some of your own posts once in a while, it's a lot of "you lefties this" and "you commies that" and "democrats are communists/zombies" and on and on.
Your posts are extremely partisan in nature.
Listen to me very carefully. You argued a strawman, period. I shouldnt even have to explain that you did. I should only have to say you did and that should be the end of it right there. The fact i gotta explain to you why your strawman is still a strawman shows that your an utter failure to no end!
So, here goes: when i say the words lefties, commies, democrats, i am not saying its not about truth vs lies, right vs wrong, facts vs none facts. What i am saying is a form of communication. Im using those terms to use simple communication. Those terms have real meanings. What works best in a societies prosperity? Rigut or left? The rights policies do.
So, what works vs what does not work (i.e truth vs lies).
However, in the case of these testimonies there talking about specific issues in relation to impeachment. Its not talking about right vs left. But, some people will defend a candidate that is bad simply due to them being in there political party. Or some people will reject a candidate simply because there not in there party.
In anycase, if we wer to debate about the best way to garden, it would be about what works best vs what doesnt. If i kept calling you a leftist, it would just be a term im using. It does not mean im not dealing with the issues.
The reality is, you and prometheus are not addressing the issues when you argue your strawman arguments.
When i tell you both that this is about truth vs lies, im saying i address the issues and i want you both to do the same. That means address my arguments and questions. And ill do likewise. Of course, i work for a living, i do my own research that is SEPERATE FROM talking with you or prometheus. So, if i dont respond to every post it dont mean im trying to run from addressing anything.
But, if i wer to respond to arguing a strawman on you, that would be me not addressing the issues. I would not waste my time responding like that. If however i did so by accident and you corrected my misunderstanding, then i would respond differently based on the new uderstanding.
However, the problem with you and prometheus and alot of other lefties ive experienced is you make strawmen, get corrected and yet you keep it up. Your brazenly stubborn beyond measure. And thats also why i call lefties zombies. Because there seams to be NO CURE. You keep on keeping on with this sickness of strawman arguments. Misrepresenting is another word for it. It dont matter what you call it, but anyone can misunderstand. The problem isnt that. The problem AFTER the misunderstanding gets corrected, you then keep it up. Which then it goes beyond a innocent misunderstanding. It goes into misrepresenting which is DISHONESTY at that point. And in my book, dishonesty is the same thing as being an outright BAD PERSON.
There, now that i explained it, your still going to keep up the strawman. And if you dont, ill be surprised. If you do, youl only show how deep your seething pride is.
Raising the issue as a serious concern that needs dealing with, and using the issue as an example during a prep question and answer period, knowing that Republicans are obssessed with the Biden/Ukraine conspiracy theory and knowing that they would grill her on it, are not the same thing at all.
So the republicans wanting to grill her on the bidens justifies her lie under oath? Really?
She lied, period. I proved she lied in showing her two quotes. I posted them now 3 or 4 times. I should have only needed to do it once. But, there is no cure for zombeism.
Please call me a liar again though, you're cracking me up. You seem to be coming more and more unhinged here ...
Unhinged are strawman arguers who get corrected and then keep up the strawmen arguments. Thats what you call unhinged.
Me standing firm in the points i made due to the fact i KNOW there validity is not called unhinged, its called honesty.
