psychoslice
Veteran Member
I was SDA for many years, and I do agree that the Sabbath is Saturday not the sun worshiping Sunday.Yes.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was SDA for many years, and I do agree that the Sabbath is Saturday not the sun worshiping Sunday.Yes.
Specifically, what CC doctrines supposedly contradict the Bible? Also, which particular church teachings are supposedly "pagan"? Also by chance, have you ever heard of an early church document called the "Didache"? Ever hear of something called the "agape meal", including when it was held? Also, do you believe that Christians are still under the Mosaiic Law-- all 613 of them as cited in Torah, which of course includes the Decalogue?SUNDAY meaning:
Sol Die, the day of the sun, or Sunday. The merger of pagan and papal Rome, Mithra and Christianity produced doctrines that are hard to identify with the Bible and even contradict it.
Yet another way the early church merged pagan worship and paganism with the early
Church of Christianity to gain converts to Christianity.
Specifically, what CC doctrines supposedly contradict the Bible? Also, which particular church teachings are supposedly "pagan"? Also by chance, have you ever heard of an early church document called the "Didache"? Ever hear of something called the "agape meal", including when it was held? Also, do you believe that Christians are still under the Mosaiic Law-- all 613 of them as cited in Torah, which of course includes the Decalogue?
I taught Christian theology for 14 years, so I very much "looked it up". Therefore, let me recommend you actually answer the questions instead of letting some biased sources do it for you. If I had posted links to RCC sources, would that be an appropriate response from me to you, iyo?http://www.bible.ca/catholic-doctrine.htm
http://www.bible.ca/cath-overview-false-teaching.htm
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception_end-time_paganism_Catholic_Mithraism
And on and on and on..................
Tell me. Why didn't you just google it up and see for yourself?
http://www.lasttrumpetministries.org/tracts/tract1.html
And on and on and on....................................
LOOK IT UP PLEASE.
I taught Christian theology for 14 years, so I very much "looked it up". Therefore, let me recommend you actually answer the questions instead of letting some biased sources do it for you. If I had posted links to RCC sources, would that be an appropriate response from me to you, iyo?
You're not answering the questions I asked.I'm proud of your accomplishments.
Yes your education and background DOES count.
You have legitimate accreditation yes?
I reserve the right to be wrong about an opinion and have an open mind.
What sources aren't biased?
Inquiring minds don'cha'know?
http://www.history.com/topics/christmas/history-of-christmas
This one meet with your educated mind?
(not being sarcastic by the way)
I am educated also with two degrees don'cha'know?
Geneva College in Pa., a Presbyterian University and Kent State, Ohio, a liberal art
college. (read liberal)
If I didn't quote sources then everything I posted would be mere opinions
would they not?
Same for you.
Without sources you post mere opinions and nothing more.
I do appreciate your opinions however, as I do most opinions posted here.
Sunday keeping as the Sabbath will not be the mark of the beast until it is enforced by law and the people have been made aware of the binding claims of God's Sabbath. Only by changing God’s law could the papacy exalt itself above God; whoever should understandingly keep the law as thus changed would be giving supreme honor to that power by which the change was made. Such an act of obedience to papal laws would be a mark of allegiance to the pope in the place of God.Hm. (Purposely sarcastic) So, celebrating the Lord on a Sunday (and Mass is everyday of the week two to three times a day) is the mark of the beast?
Or is it not worship that's the issue but something surface level?
Judging a person's worship as the mark of the beast based on the surface level tradition that, without experiencing it (internally and spiritually not routine and ritualistic), means nothing?
Isn't that inappropriate to relate worship to the mark of the beast?
How does a day out of the week affect a person's relationship with Christ?
Since Catholics and like denominations celebrate everyday of the week; and, Catholics do twice or three times a day depending on where you're from, would it be odd to tell a Catholic that he can only worship Monday through Saturday and leave sunday out and maybe go to work instead?
Is there more of a deeper meaning to your thread rather than days of the week and rituals? If not, how does a person's relationship with Christ devalue because he worships on a Sunday?
May I ask why you left? Only those that endure to the end shall be saved. 'He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.' Rev 21:7I was SDA for many years, and I do agree that the Sabbath is Saturday not the sun worshiping Sunday.
Well I left the organization called SDA, you don't have to be a member to be so called saved, no church will ever save you.May I ask why you left? Only those that endure to the end shall be saved. 'He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.' Rev 21:7
Yes we do. The foundation of our faith laid by God through the founders will hold as long as time shall last because it is true and founded on Scripture.As I mentioned in my last post, a lot of rethinking on this has occurred over the last century especially, so do the SDA still teach this?
And God speed to you and yours as well.
There is not a single text of Scripture which warrants Sunday worship- it is wholly a man made institution. The Catholics readily acknowledge this fact, see below: Great Controversy p. 447 'Roman Catholics acknowledge that the change of the Sabbath was made by their church, and declare that Protestants by observing the Sunday are recognizing her power. In the Catholic Catechism of Christian Religion, in answer to a question as to the day to be observed in obedience to the fourth commandment, this statement is made: “During the old law, Saturday was the day sanctified; but the church, instructed by Jesus Christ, and directed by the Spirit of God, has substituted Sunday for Saturday; so now we sanctify the first, not the seventh day. Sunday means, and now is, the day of the Lord.”'I don't know of any Christian group that worships Sunday. "On Sunday", yes.
Also, just a reminder that if one believes that Jesus "fulfilled the Law", thus ending it, then the Sabbath worship is simply not mandatory. If one insists that it still is, do they also insist that one must keep kosher, which includes a series of Laws mandated in Torah?
You missed the point.There is not a single text of Scripture which warrants Sunday worship- it is wholly a man made institution. The Catholics readily acknowledge this fact, see below: Great Controversy p. 447 Roman Catholics acknowledge that the change of the Sabbath was made by their church, and declare that Protestants by observing the Sunday are recognizing her power. In the Catholic Catechism of Christian Religion, in answer to a question as to the day to be observed in obedience to the fourth commandment, this statement is made: “During the old law, Saturday was the day sanctified; but the church, instructed by Jesus Christ, and directed by the Spirit of God, has substituted Sunday for Saturday; so now we sanctify the first, not the seventh day. Sunday means, and now is, the day of the Lord.”
We are under the law of liberty- the 10 commandments- but no longer under the ritual law which is wholly distinct.You missed the point.
OK, are you under the Law or not? If you are, then you must follow as close as possible all 613 of them as found in Torah.
If you are not under the Law, then this includes the Ten Commandments as they are the first 10 of the 613. And of the Ten, celebrating Shabbat is one of them.
The SDA logically cannot realistically have it both ways even though they've been doing it. I know of some other churches that do this same bizarre thing with tithing, which is terribly self-serving for them.
It's truly a shame they teach that, especially since there simply is not one single reference to the RCC mentioned or even implied in the Christian scriptures. I grew up being taught that same nonsense, and let me tell ya-- it really is nonsense.Yes we do. The foundation of our faith laid by God through the founders will hold as long as time shall last because it is true and founded on Scripture.
That's complete nonsense as most of the Laws simply have nothing to do with "ritual"-- click onto my link on post #54 and see for yourself). If they are teaching you that lie, then you really should consider looking for a church that doesn't preach such dishonesty.We are under the law of liberty- the 10 commandments- but no longer under the ritual law which is wholly distinct.
Observing Sabbath is an express commandment in the moral law. Only the ritual part was abolished at the cross since it was symbolic of the sacrifice of Jesus while the rest still holds. Moses was commanded to write, as God should bid him, judgments and laws giving minute instruction as to what was required. These directions relating to the duty of the people to God, to one another, and to the stranger were only the principles of the Ten Commandments amplified and given in a specific manner, that none need err.That's complete nonsense as most of the Laws simply have nothing to do with "ritual"-- click onto my link on post #54 and see for yourself). If they are teaching you that lie, then you really should consider looking for a church that doesn't preach such dishonesty.
BTW, observing Shabbat could be considered "ritual", so their argument is completely bogus.
Observing Sabbath is an express commandment in the moral law. Only the ritual part was abolished at the cross since it was symbolic of the sacrifice of Jesus while the rest still holds. Moses was commanded to write, as God should bid him, judgments and laws giving minute instruction as to what was required. These directions relating to the duty of the people to God, to one another, and to the stranger were only the principles of the Ten Commandments amplified and given in a specific manner, that none need err.
If Jesus did not abolish the ritual law, then what are those ordinances which Scripture says that He nailed to the cross? "Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross," Colossians 2:14All the Commandments, all 613 of them, are "moral laws"-- every single one of them. Jews were punished by God for playing fast and loose with the Laws, which is a frequent theme in the Tanakh. Did you actually look at the link I gave you that says what each Commandment is and where it's found in the first five books in your Bible? They're there. Did you look 'em up. They're not "nice suggestions" to do when ever one feels like it. And they are "directions relating to the duty of the people to God, to one another, and to the stranger were only the principles of the Ten Commandments amplified and given in a specific manner, that none need err".
The separation of the Law was considered a heresy, and a "false prophet" was one who told the people that they didn't have to follow all of the Law. Even if one decided to somehow separate the Laws into different categories, the scriptures make it clear that all of the Law must be followed.