George Washington
*banned*
originally, Israel was very small. There was plenty of room for the Palestinians to flourish. Of course, that wasn't good enough.Let's be clear here - Arab leaders abroad supported the British against the Ottoman's in return for what they understood to be an independence promise for the Palestinians and other Arab regions. Hussein-McMahon correspondence | History & Map
After the war when Britain became the new occupier,this national self-determination was not granted. Instead, Britain announced that it would support the creation of a national homeland in Palestine for Jews. Balfour would later go on to say that they had a right to reject Palestinian self-determination.
Look how tiny Israel was, and would have remained, if the Palestinians, and surrounding Arab countries wouldnt have attacked them:
They weren't denied self determination. They could have had it, but instead focused on eradicating Israel as not only their primary goal, but as their only goal. Mistakes were made, and Israel took full advantage of them over it.So the Palestinians were then in a position that they were being denied their own self-determination in the name of the creation of the Jewish homeland. Why would anyone expect them to be happy or welcoming of this?
The fears of the Arab population of Palestine were that the Zionist movement would endanger their economic subsistence and that the Zionists become their new overlords. Looking at Palestine today, there is no other conclusion that I can draw but that the Arab fear was rational.
Given this, to characterize Arab resistance to Zionism as resulting from a desire to have 'preferential treatment' is nothing but apologia for the British and later the Israeli leaders.