Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's what he says. He also says it's cuz ofHe turned belligerent because of NATO's expansionism.
It is like a man who beats his wife, and then claims “she made me do it”.He turned belligerent because of NATO's expansionism.
That makes no sense.
Which NATO countries want war?
- Neon will likely be less available.
Ukraine is a big producer, & this supply is now threatened.
- Gas deposits offshore from Ukraine will be controlled by
Russia.
- War getting rid of Putin is risky.
And had there been no war, there'd be no need to ditch him.
A Scholar says....? Well then, it all must be true!This video says there are many people in the southern hemisphere that view US as a provocateur in this current Russian-Ukraine war. The scholar in the included video argues that NATO has threatened Russia by potentially placing nukes there, and he also says that US CIA has promoted right wing candidates in Ukraine thus interfering with its politics. These are seen as provocations which have triggered some anxiety in Russia. He compares NATO's actions to those of the USSR when it attempted to place nukes in Cuba in the 60's. He says that there was a diplomatic way to handle this situation but that "The West was not interested in a diplomatic solution" and also worries that the USA with our enormous military will also stoke tensions in the Far East.
He condemns the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but he does think the US and NATO helped to cause the situation.
I think he makes an argument though perhaps there are counter perspectives to consider.
Putin isn't a closet Communist.Which is why Putin's motivations are questionable. I'm wondering if he's actually a closet Communist.
Too bad Russia didn't have a leader now like Gorbachev was back then. There wouldn't have been a Ukraine invasion today I would think, but of course that's just entertaining a what if scenario.
If he can be captured then he'll be tried for war-crimes......no doubt.OK, take him to International Court of Justice.
And I underline that Russia has stopped being Communist in 1989.
So let us distinguish.
OK, take him to International Court of Justice.
Democracy is the best possible solution. Populism is the villain.
I hope they are able to keep their integrity.
That they had to go to a war, I consider that a bad example.
I think Putin is looking for a secure Russia.
Putin isn't a closet Communist.
He aligns more closely with some kind of Mega-Mafia Bandit.
Neon was readily available from Ukraine.I don´t know exactly what individuals yet. Could be that they want Russia to collapse so they get the ng, neon etc for themselves.
So a guy decides to rob a bank, it is not because he wants the money, obviously he was tricked by some devious individual.I don´t know exactly what individuals yet. Could be that they want Russia to collapse so they get the ng, neon etc for themselves.
Some in NATO wanted this war. Putin took the bait. Spirit told me.
For several reasons perhaps. No competition in the middle east?
I was initially surprised that so many people sidedSo a guy decides to rob a bank, it is not because he wants the money, obviously he was tricked by some devious individual.
Poor little Puty, such an innocent little angel. I am sure the idea of taking Ukraine’s natural resources for himself ever occurred to him. Obviously he was tricked.
War getting rid of Putin is risky.
All those Russian soldiers are actually Ukrainian foreignVery probable.
Knowing how many times the American Deep State has planned false flags in history.
Example: the Tonkin incident. Confessed by McNamara before dying.
They are capable of anything.
Well bombing hospitals definitely fits in as a war crime.If he can be captured then he'll be tried for war-crimes......no doubt.