Wirey
Fartist
Apparently you are an expert at fooling yourself.
Says the man who thinks the US dynamited the Towers and Oswald worked for the CIA.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Apparently you are an expert at fooling yourself.
Animal trappers are psychopaths.
Or y'know, It's a valid comparison.
You are more than capable of analyzing what they are saying and disregarding the analogy if you wish, you're not an idiot. Real idea's have been discussed and thrown around already in this thread.
Calling Godwin's law has always been a distractionary argument. If the Hitler comparison isn't valid, explain why it isn't valid.
The person dismissing the claim on the basis of what the analogy compares to is the one without real ideas, not the one making the analogy.
I agree in the sense that Hitler comparisons aren't very efficient on continuing discussion. Perhaps it is more efficient to explain why their analogy is valid/invalid, rather than dismiss the person making the analogy entirely, no?
Fine, we fail to show humanity to things that aren't human. Granted. My issue was with the Holocaust reference as a logical failure.
Would you mind putting spoilers on those images? People could be taken aback by the harsh pictures.
Animal trappers are psychopaths.
Aushwitz a place were people are killed, factory farms, a place where animals are slaughtered, its a pretty close connection, your whole argument is based on the idea that humans are the only lives that are important and animals lives don't matter, which is pretty ignorant attitude.
Well to us vegetarians, some meat eaters lives aren't as important to us as many animals lives.
A lot of vegetarians see murderers lives as less important, and animal life just as important as human.
A lot of vegetarians see murderers lives as less important, and animal life just as important as human.
Sorry about that. Yes, will put spoilers on such horrible pictures.Would you mind putting spoilers on those images? People could be taken aback by the harsh pictures.
Fair enoughAushwitz a place were people are killed, factory farms, a place where animals are slaughtered, its a pretty close connection,
Where do you draw the line?your whole argument is based on the idea that humans are the only lives that are important and animals lives don't matter, which is pretty ignorant attitude.
If you feel that a post violates the rules, please report it. All reports are taken case by case and we make sure bias does not become a problem.So I just lost a few posts because I am apparently making personal attacks, unlike the wonderful respectful treatment I have received in turn:
I guess a mod is a vegan too. You win. I'll never eat meat again. God forbid someone has a differing viewpoint.
Sentience, I would say.Fair enough
Where do you draw the line?
Bacteria?
Virii?
Ah, yes.
Never mind.
It is plants....
I'm going to go eat a bacon cheeseburger in your honor.Well if you actually read the messages the mod's sent you I think saying you made personal attacks are pretty indisputable.
If you maintain the position that you did not in futility there is a process for having the mods hear your case, also in the mail.
You directly made attacks against people based on who they were and not what they were arguing.
Personally I think saying someone has never used their brain to think properly in their life is a personal attack, no?
I also reported Nous if that makes you feel any better about your actions.
Please review the rule or read the message mods sent you.
I did not personally attack you. I called you out for personal attacks. There is a pretty big difference. If you feel I crossed a line I would support you reporting the post and having the mods review it.
I'm not going to be super polite to you after your earlier display, I'm issuing you the respect the rules give you, not the amount I think you deserve.
The argument that your personal attacks were not personal attacks because you were also being personally attacked is pretty weak.
If you don't want to accept blame a solid strategy is to pin it onto the one making the judgement.
We do not criticize a viewpoint because it's different, but because of moral reasons.
Supporters of immoral practice throughout history have used similar arguments.
We have derailed the thread. Have a nice day.
I'm going to go eat a bacon cheeseburger in your honor.