slave2six
Substitious
Psst! Don't tell anyone but there was no "Adam and Eve."I have never stated that. I think Adam and Eve were the first humans given Consciousness by God, but they were not the first humans, Archaeology proves that.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Psst! Don't tell anyone but there was no "Adam and Eve."I have never stated that. I think Adam and Eve were the first humans given Consciousness by God, but they were not the first humans, Archaeology proves that.
Look, if you want to come online and say, "These particular things convince me that there is a God", then that's great. More power to you.
But it's madness to post those things as PROOF of God in a DEBATE FORUM and then say, "Hey, it's just my opinion, I don't want to convince you!" That's what debate is about, yes? To present a coherent argument in an effort to convince people of a particular point of view?
Like I said, I'm happy for you. But I really think you shouldn't be in a debate forum.
Glad we have cleared that up.I admit to being in the Darkness, my opinions affected by it.
Why do you think anyone cares about your madness or what's on your chest?I do not debate to convince, I debate to get off my chest, whats on it. Like a whirlwind inside of me, I just have to get it out of me, with no concern of how it is received. Which is madness
What exactly does this mean, you EXHALE yourself????????I have two post here that I exhale myself in
Mick let me sum up your theory here.
Romance exists (this is true) and god created it (this is an assumption).
I'm sorry this isn't proof. This is your personal opinion.quote
This is not a theory, you just view it as such, to me it is fact. It is proof to me, its personal fact to me, its absolute truth to me, and I post it as such. How you view it, is meaningless to me.
If quoteyou dont want people to debate your personal opinion don't post it on a discussion forum. Because discussion forums are there for people to discuss and debate peoples ideas. You are more than entitled to your opinions but if you just want to exhale it out there, get it off your chest, then perhaps a blog would be a better medium for it. That way discussion and debate is not invited.
-Q
Now,now, I don't think anyone wants to control how you communicate, I think most of us wish you were more educated on the subjects you reject.You can't tell me not to post, you do not control that right, as no Atheist alive or dead will ever control how I communicate.
I'm sure you do have that many posts, posting your opinion with no supporting evidence is sure to draw the ire of many.I have debated over 500 combined pages on both of my post, just not in a manner which Atheist approve of.
.LOL, the absolute reality according to Mickiel.And none of you seem to accept this absolute reality
I hope so, we would all be lost without you.but I will continue to be me.
Or any other opposing thoughts. It must be splendid to know you are always right.And with me, there is no room whatsoever for Atheist thought.
Of course you do, that way you can stay warm and cozy in your beliefs, never having them challenged, be comfortable, pay no attention to anything that might challenge your belief. I just hope you never have to defend it with logic and reason.And I like it like that. I like limiting my exposure to Godless belief.
Ah, now I'm hurt, and I thought we were just starting to get along----oh well!!I don't like Atheist, never have. I have to force myself to tolerate many of you, your insults, your dry cynicism, your unruly sarcasm, your absolute blindness to God. People who I don't like, don't easily win my respect. And there are not many Atheist that I respect, nor that I like talking too.
When you will make what again?And Atheist best remember this confession. Because the time will come in the future, that I will make it again.
Amen to that brother, we can only hope.And my ability to communicate it, may well increase.
You can't tell me not to post, you do not control that right, as no Atheist alive or dead will ever control how I communicate. I have debated over 500 combined pages on both of my post, just not in a manner which Atheist approve of.
I don't need Atheist approval, or their definitions of how I debate and communicate. And none of you seem to accept this absolute reality. Mickiel is someone that Atheist cannot control, influence, or dictate terms of communication to. There is nothing you can do with me. You can continue to try, but I will continue to be me. And with me, there is no room whatsoever for Atheist thought.
And I like it like that. I like limiting my exposure to Godless belief. But I will respond to the respect that Atheist distribute toward me. And will reject the disrespect.
I don't like Atheist, never have. I have to force myself to tolerate many of you, your insults, your dry cynicism, your unruly sarcasm, your absolute blindness to God. People who I don't like, don't easily win my respect. And there are not many Atheist that I respect, nor that I like talking too.
And Atheist best remember this confession. Because the time will come in the future, that I will make it again. But by then, I will more be understanding of the Truth. And my ability to communicate it, may well increase.
Peace.
Peace.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
:bow:
WE ARE NOT WORTHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You'd make a great chaote mick.
[/quote][
One does ones thinking before one knows what one is thinking about. Thinking then is not Conscious, rather it is an automatic process following a struction and the materials on which the struction operate. Early Homo Sapiens could think, but were not conscious of their thinking. They could even reason, but Consciousness is not necessary for Reason. Logic is not Consciousness. For example; Choosing paths, words, notes, motions, these are all primitive kinds of reasonings that go on without Consciousness. But to those unaware of this truth, they will attribute these things as being evidence of Consciousness, which is absurd.
Excellent point, though I disagree with you that our intense imagination is a flaw. Surely it has negatives, the only one I can think of now imaginary friends (including 'Deities'); but imagination has given us great advances in science and philosophy.Pair bonding is seen in other animals; it's useful for survival. No evidence for god there.
We as a species are capable of fearing ghosts and demons, trusting that rabbit's feet and four-leaf clovers bring us good luck, and forming bonds with imaginary friends. These are evolutionary flaws. No evidence for god there either.
Its not silly to me, I am the source, its my belief, my view, and my thoughts. And I don't view my thoughts as silly. Do you need a source for all your views? Does everything you believe come from a source outside of yourself? I am not trying to prove anything to you, I am telling you what I believe. I need no sources, its you that have that need, I trust my own mind.
Peace.
Why would atheists want to take away the love in this world? And what does God have to do with the awesome beauty and diversity of life on our planet? And by 'God' I mean all Gods conceived, including Yahweh, the FSM, Allah, Buddha, the Flying Teapot and more. I'm an atheist and I am too greatly inspired by the greatness of our world. The beauty of life makes it worthwhile.Romance is another Proof of God, as I see it throughout all of creation. Birds singing and flying in unision, the attraction ritual that we all go through in every race, the inner desires that were not developed, but we were somehow born with. Love is a Proof of God, but not many understand Love ( Including myself) so I explain in terms that I can understand, Romance. Romance, ( or Love) has no evolution. It didnot grow on a tree, no Atheist can take away its power to drive humanity away from fruitless belief that dismisses the pressence of a designing being who gave the ingredient, because thats how he is himself.
Again, why would we want to destroy love, and what the heck does God have to do with love? As if you need God in order to love. Don't all animals and evil sinners know love (psychologically disabled left aside)? Or do you just mean that love is just another creation of God, like everything else?Now, the bible speaks of a time that Love will grow cold on earth, or that Atheist will multiply and turn the meaning of Love away from God, and toward it evolving from spaceballs.
Obviously, you've never heard of hormones. Essentially, the feelings we describe as 'love' are just that, a machinery in action. It's not as romantic as when it would be a magnificent something you'd have gotten from a higher being - but it at least it is real.Thats what Atheist are doing, sapping the true meaning of Love away from mankind, and turning it into animalistic tendency or a machine.
What "power"? Nothing has the power to perform supernatural miracles over this world, so there is no power I would have taken from God. The only 'power' that would be is the orderly mechanism of nature. But nature works by logic, the simple law of cause and effect. Unlike God, nature makes sense and we can very efficiently wield it to good use. And nature isn't a higher power or spirit or force, it is just all that there is, including ourselves.When you don't believe in God, you have to credit " Other Things" and give those things the power you have taken from God.
Are you afraid of reality? I think your image of Atheists is people who "believe" in sex, or drugs or alcohol. But we don't believe in anything, that's what makes us atheists. We don't ascribe a power over our lives to anything, because we ourselves have that power. We don't need a celestial sugar-daddy to get along, reality is just fine for us, better even. What exactly do you think will happen to the world if there were no more religious people? (a.k.a. only atheists)I view Atheist as " The believers in Other Things". The " Other Thing" is what is killing mankind. Its the " Other Lion" that makes the kill. Its not the Lion that you can see who makes the kill, its " The Other Lion" which you cannot see that is effective in the maul. Atheist are mauling the belief of humanity and tearing it to bits. But they are transparent, I can see them. I can see the other. I can see what happens to mankind when they get engulfed in the " Other Things." The forbidden fruits, the sarcasm, the negative, the aittitude, the agression, the freedom to do whatever and think whatever. The pandoras box of thinking outside of God.
I'm very anxious to read what you think an Atheist really is.And since the Atheist are continuing to pester me, I want to go into them for a bit, and they are going to help me do this. I will be using their own comments to reveal just what an Atheist really is.
Peace.
We all need sources for almost everything. The only innate source that we have is our body, which is programmed to do certain things (like the survival instinct, love, hunger, thirst, curiousness, etc.), the basic aspects of human life.Its not silly to me, I am the source, its my belief, my view, and my thoughts. And I don't view my thoughts as silly. Do you need a source for all your views? Does everything you believe come from a source outside of yourself? I am not trying to prove anything to you, I am telling you what I believe. I need no sources, its you that have that need, I trust my own mind.
Peace.
Why would atheists want to take away the love in this world? And what does God have to do with the awesome beauty and diversity of life on our planet? And by 'God' I mean all Gods conceived, including Yahweh, the FSM, Allah, Buddha, the Flying Teapot and more. I'm an atheist and I am too greatly inspired by the greatness of our world. The beauty of life makes it worthwhile.
Again, why would we want to destroy love, and what the heck does God have to do with love? As if you need God in order to love. Don't all animals and evil sinners know.
That's quite an extraordinary statement you've made right there. WE distort reality? How so? Just because we don't believe in the same superstition you do, for which there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE? (No real evidence anyway...) I mean, dude, even IF; the mere notion that God made us out of Love (he probably was lonely), doesn't mean that that Love is something we've gotten from God. Are you saying only humans know love?So that is one thing an Atheist is, a distorter of truth. Their theme is distortion, and they feed off of it. Spread it, and nueturalize the true orgin of Love, and dissovle it. A planet created by a God, now has become the planet of the Apes. Credit for human life has been given to Apes.
And I want to go into that.
Peace.
?
Atheists care about truth, about REAL truth - truth that is backed up with evidence. We just don't love God, or think we love because of God, because we think he probably isn't there.
I wanted to get into this debate here, but forget it. Mickiel doens't want to debate anything. He just wants everyone to agree with him. He's looking for posts like:
"You know, your right!"
"I'm learning a lot from you! What else do you have to say?"
"Wow! I've never had it explained so clearly before!"