So not only are people you disagree with not entitled to speak; now they aren't even entitled to their thoughts?
Of course they are entitled to their opinions. Yet opinions can be wrong. Did you see the photos? Culturally accurate clothing, facepaint, hair style. She just wasn't Japanese. It was hardly a malicious caricature - which would be the "yellow face" she's being accused of.
SJWs don't actually exist. That is not actually a thing. It's an exonymous slur used for people supporting progressive causes.
Would you prefer "aggressive progressive"? Also do you mean "eponymous"? "Exonymous" isn't a word that I can find anywhere in my OED.
And no, SJW does not refer to progressives. I've never once been referred to as a SJW, despite supporting various progressive sentimentalities. Why? Because SJW's are
not progressives. They are those who, rather than challenge ideas or discuss alternatives, attempt to shut down things they disagree with. Accusations like
"you can't say/do/think that". There is no progress with them, there is immediate, violent retribution for slights that
they perceive.
They determine the victims, and they also determine who
cannot be victims. Even when these things clearly contradict observable fact. SJW's rewrite history, ignoring things that are "offensive". Unless, of course, it's used to shame people. Yes, SJW's shame people, and often. Because the best way to change anyone's mind is to insult them.
Progressives work towards progress. Educating, discussing,
helping. SJW's deny, ignore, repress, and intimidate.
Phrasing it like that paints the picture that people who disagree are disagreeing that we should recognise their reality rather than disagreeing it exists. A somewhat dishonest tactic.
Yes, it is a dishonest tactic. Yet it is what SJW's do. They - to borrow a famous theme - deal in absolutes. Their reality is the only one that matters, and if they bully hard enough it becomes a "social fact."