• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Modern Orthodox Jew introducing herself

Eliana

Member
Favorite movie genres, if any?

I edit film and television for a living, so I don't watch very much. I mostly like documentries and biographies.

Could you give a 30.000 foot view of "Modern Orthodox" as compare to other Jewish "religious movements" and in particular the ultra Orthodox that we see in Israel these days? I mean the guys with the black hats. ;)

I could look it up, but it would be interesting to get it from you.

I'm old (83), somewhat atheist, though I've dabbled in various religions at times, and am an ex-pat Brit living in the USA. I had a very close Jewish friend (now deceased) and have an interest in the Jewish faith.

They are slippery terms that people use as a convenient descriptor. The ultra-Orthodox and those types tend to be ridiculously pedantic about Jewish laws and very isolationist as a community. In a nutshell it means how strictly someone applies Halakha. Orthodox is Orthodox, it's just the degree of how anal someone is about the rules.

Hello and welcome.

You are an orthodox Jew but do not believe in "the devil." So, what do think of the following:

"Satan appears in the Bible, was discussed by the rabbis of the Talmud and is explored in detail in Jewish mysticism, or Kabbalah. In Hebrew, the term Satan is usually translated as “opponent” or “adversary,” and he is often understood to represent the sinful impulse (in Hebrew, yetzer hara) or, more generally, the forces that prevents human beings from submitting to divine will. He is also sometimes regarded as a heavenly prosecutor or accuser, a view given expression in the Book of Job, where Satan encourages God to test his servant."







God bless

I don't believe in Kabbalah or have much regard for it. Lucifer, the devil and so on are Christian terms used in Christian theology. Satan, or HaSatan is a very different figure in Judaism and is not a very important one either. We don't believe in fallen angels and Satan is simply one of G-d's agents. The Satan as portrayed in Christianity is so vastly different that I feel it important to draw a clear distinction.

This thread isnt about me my beliefs on Lucifer. I can create a new one if you want me to answer that? I dont wish to derail this one.

Too late.

Its fine to be blunt, but for the sake of saving you some trouble I point out there are unique discussion rules on RF which you may not have encountered on other forums. One of the rules to look at closely is rule 10 which is called the Dir rule. We have this idea that most of the forum is not for correcting other members. Unless an area is marked 'Debate' in its section heading the conversation tone should be about one's own opinion and should not be critical of someone else's. For example if you say you like pizza, and I say I don't that fine. If I claim you shouldn't like pizza then that is debate or if I say that your reasons for liking pizza are not valid then that is debate. The definition of 'Debate' is a little different than what many new members expect, and debate is allowed -- just not in all sections. We also have unique rules that make missionaries behave. When the rules say 'No preaching' its not just sermons but telling others that you are right absolutely as opposed to expressing your opinion. A non religious person can 'Preach', too. So be careful to understand the rules, and otherwise feel free to argue or engage in productive and hopefully fun dialogue.

I believe what I believe and I would never follow a "rule" that I have to accept a contradictory theology. Jews don't preach or try to convert others but I am always up front about who and what I am, and what I'll tolerate. It's not like I plan to go into any of the sections for other religions anyway.

Welcome to RF



One thing to note is that you will find just about if not every possible take on religious matters here. Given that statement, I suggest there are many areas where your lack of tolerance would not be tested especially in specific threads in debate sections of the forum.

I tolerate people just fine and I'm a live and let live kind of girl. Nowhere did I say anyone should be censored or outlawed, just that I personally can't stand them. It kind of cuts to the chase.

Hello and welcome.:sunflower::herb:
When you say you can’t stand Christians, does that mean you can’t stand their beliefs or you can’t stand them as individuals?

No, I said I can't stand Messianic "Jews", "Jews" for Jesus, American Evangelicals and Christian Zionists. I was very specific about those particular communities. The reasons are because I don't like how Messianic and "Jews" for Jesus types attack the Jewish community and I believe they are deceptively trying to pretend to be Jewish when they are not. I don't like American evangelicals because I think they are fascist, racist, prejudiced, rageful, hypocritical and dangerous. I don't like Christian Zionists because for one I don't like Zionism to start with, and I think Christian Zionists are antisemites who purposely encourage war, strife and violence against Jews in order to satisfy their apocalyptic beliefs.

Whew, I'm a Roman Catholic so I'm not an evangelical Christian. Also, I am sorry about your widowhood. I thought I was a young widow at age 58! I am 62 now and am still single - probably will be for the remainder of my life. I was married to another Christian, though he was Methodist and not Catholic. Oh well. We can't all be perfect!

The majority of Ireland is still Catholic. I'm not crazy about the Catholic church because of the damage they've done in Ireland in terms of child abuse and slavery i.e. the Magdalene laundries.

Forgive my ignorance, but what does “modern orthodox” mean? It seems a contradiction.

See above.

Interesting. I do not think I've ever encountered a Modern Orthodox Jew who, as a Modern Orthodox Jew, married outside the faith.

I very much appreciate what little I know about Canada. We'll be once again spending a little more than a week in Stratford come mid-August.

It's a little more common for "modern" Orthodox, but it's still around 2% of marriages. I don't recommend interfaith marriages.
 
Last edited:

Eliana

Member
There are many teaching in Torah about the Satan. Perhaps you make a distinction between the Satan and the Devil/Lucifer? I know very little about Modern Orthodox; are there areas of Torah you don't believe in?

Jews don't get the option of picking and choosing, which is why we reject reformed/conservative/whatever forms of Judaism. I answered this question in my previous post.
 

Regiomontanus

Eastern Orthodox
I edit film and television for a living, so I don't watch very much. I mostly like documentries and biographies.



They are slippery terms that people use as a convenient descriptor. The ultra-Orthodox and those types tend to be ridiculously pedantic about Jewish laws and very isolationist as a community. In a nutshell it means how strictly someone applies Halakha. Orthodox is Orthodox, it's just the degree of how anal someone is about the rules.



I don't believe in Kabbalah or have much regard for it. Lucifer, the devil and so on are Christian terms used in Christian theology. Satan, or HaSatan is a very different figure in Judaism and is not a very important one either. We don't believe in fallen angels and Satan is simply one of G-d's agents. The Satan as portrayed in Christianity is so vastly different that I feel it important to draw a clear distinction.



Too late.



I believe what I believe and I would never follow a "rule" that I have to accept a contradictory theology. Jews don't preach or try to convert others but I am always up front about who and what I am, and what I'll tolerate. It's not like I plan to go into any of the sections for other religions anyway.



I tolerate people just fine and I'm a live and let live kind of girl. Nowhere did I say anyone should be censored or outlawed, just that I personally can't stand them. It kind of cuts to the chase.



No, I said I can't stand Messianic "Jews", "Jews" for Jesus and American Evangelicals and Christian Zionists. I was very specific about those particular communities. The reasons are because I don't like how Messianic and "Jews" for Jesus types attack the Jewish community and I believe they are deceptively trying to pretend to be Jewish when they are not. I don't like American evangelicals because I think they are fascist, racist, prejudiced, rageful, hypocritical and dangerous. I don't like Christian Zionists because for one I don't like Zionism to start with, and I think Christian Zionists are antisemites who purposely encourage war, strife and violence against Jews in order to satisfy their apocalyptic beliefs.



The majority of Ireland is still Catholic. I'm not crazy about the Catholic church because of the damage they've done in Ireland in terms of child abuse and slavery i.e. the Magdalene laundries.



See above.



It's a little more common for "modern" Orthodox, but it's still around 2% of marriages. I don't recommend interfaith marriages.


Interesting, though I quoted Jewish scripture, not Christian per say.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I believe what I believe and I would never follow a "rule" that I have to accept a contradictory theology. Jews don't preach or try to convert others but I am always up front about who and what I am, and what I'll tolerate. It's not like I plan to go into any of the sections for other religions anyway.
Thanks for clarifying that. The rules here would not (to my knowledge) force you to accept a theology or belief of any kind.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I stumbled across this forum and thought I'd give it a go. A bit about myself:

- I'm blunt.
- I'm very Jewish, Modern Orthodox if that matters.
- I can't stand Messianic "Jews", "Jews" for Jesus, Christian Zionists and American evangelicals in general.
- I'm 26
- I'm a widow
- I was married to a Christian. I don't recommend interfaith marriages.
- I worked as a professional model and been around the world.
- Born in Israel, moved to Ireland when I was three.

Ask me almost anything and I'll try and answer.


Welcome to the rabble!

I never heard of modern Jews before. It sounds like a new Jewish movement.
 

Eliana

Member
Welcome to the rabble!

I never heard of modern Jews before. It sounds like a new Jewish movement.

It isn't new and as I said in my above posts all Orthodox Jews follow Halakha. It's a descriptor that really only means how strict someone is, and even then there are people all over the spectrum.

Interesting, though I quoted Jewish scripture, not Christian per say.

I wasn't originally addressing you when I said I didn't believe in the devil or Lucifer, I was merely clarifying and answering your perfectly legitimate question.
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
I stumbled across this forum and thought I'd give it a go. A bit about myself:

- I'm blunt.
- I'm very Jewish, Modern Orthodox if that matters.
- I can't stand Messianic "Jews", "Jews" for Jesus, Christian Zionists and American evangelicals in general.
- I'm 26
- I'm a widow
- I was married to a Christian. I don't recommend interfaith marriages.
- I worked as a professional model and been around the world.
- Born in Israel, moved to Ireland when I was three.

Ask me almost anything and I'll try and answer.
Welcome. To bad you can’t stand so many people. I like people of all walks of faith.
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
That strikes me as more than a little rude and disrespectful.

Why should we respect lawlessness?

When I break Jewish law, I accept that I broke the law. That is very different than breaking the law and then rationalizing it by attacking the law and calling it pagan ( Reform Judaism ).

Make sense?
 

Eliana

Member
I'm a live and let live person, so it's not like I'd be mean or anything. I believe in treating people as I would want to be treated. I'm only stating this rabbi has a view that is out of the Orthodox Jewish mainstream.
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
I'm a live and let live person, so it's not like I'd be mean or anything. I believe in treating people as I would want to be treated. I'm only stating this rabbi has a view that is out of the Orthodox Jewish mainstream.

This reminds me of what you wrote about the matter of fact dislike of the Messianic Jews, Jews for Jesus, etc... ? Not in the same magnitude, but the same basic idea?

Perhaps one would soften it, because you're Jewish talking to another Jew? But ultimately it's the same thing? Just softer and more subtle? Where as the Jews for Jesus are right in our faces, so to speak?

It's still an identification miss-match? The individual calls themself a Rabbi, but, that is incomplete and somewhat deceptive? It's more accurate and descriptive to say Apostate-Rabbi, because that is what they are preaching? They are preaching and teaching apostasy?

The J4J do the same thing pretending to Jews. The Evangelicals do the same thing misrepresenting the Torah. The Reform Rabbis do the same thing? But it's more subtle? You said, "forgotten"? They have "forgotten" they are apostate? I think that's a great way of putting it.

@Jayhawker Soule , you're being reminded. It's not disrespectful.
 

Eliana

Member
This reminds me of what you wrote about the matter of fact dislike of the Messianic Jews, Jews for Jesus, etc... ? Not in the same magnitude, but the same basic idea?

Perhaps one would soften it, because you're Jewish talking to another Jew? But ultimately it's the same thing? Just softer and more subtle? Where as the Jews for Jesus are right in our faces, so to speak?

It's still an identification miss-match? The individual calls themself a Rabbi, but, that is incomplete and somewhat deceptive? It's more accurate and descriptive to say Apostate-Rabbi, because that is what they are preaching? They are preaching and teaching apostasy?

The J4J do the same thing pretending to Jews. The Evangelicals do the same thing misrepresenting the Torah. The Reform Rabbis do the same thing? But it's more subtle? You said, "forgotten"? They have "forgotten" they are apostate? I think that's a great way of putting it.

@Jayhawker Soule , you're being reminded. It's not disrespectful.
I never said the rabbi is an apostate. I said he was forgetting Jewish law regarding reform/conservative Jews.

The reason I don't like Jews for Jesus/Messianic and so on has already been explained in a previous post.
 
Top