Modern Science proves the Authenticity of the Glorious Qur'an

[Fatihah]

LOL - It would appear that Fatihah is now going to limit the debate to his understanding of the English language. If he says that "up" means anything below you, then that is the definition you must use.

There is no end to the lunacy that eminates from this guy.

PS - I know, I know - you see a statement, but you don't see any proof.

Response: LOL. Yes, you predicted my response very well.

 

[Fatihah]

I would like to suggest the following:
American Psychiatric Association
Reasoning in an American Society: A Unit on Logic.
How to Live Without Friends - wikiHow

Take your time browsing the sites, Fatihah. The third one may give you a chance at making your way through this world.

Response: Thanks but I don't need it.

 

[Fatihah]

I know you well enough, Ymir. This post HAS to be tongue-in-cheek.

Surely you didn't really think this clown even knew that different models existed - much less understood the distinctions between them.

Response: Post 509 begs to differ.

 

[The Voice of Reason]

Seems that Fatihah has been reduced to "'I know you are but what am I'" type responses.
I sure hope Allah is mighty proud of him,
'Cause I would downright embarrassed.

That is exactly why I began responding with the third grade taunt a while back. I don't know how old he is, but his debating skills rival that of a third grader.

A slow, dull witted third grader, but a third grader nonetheless.

 

[The Voice of Reason]

Response: Post 509 begs to differ.

LOL - Post #509 is no different than the rest of the trash you've posted, while acting as if you are painting masterpieces. Your fanaticism for your religion is matched only by your self delusion in your debating skills.

 

[YmirGF]

Your fanaticism for your religion is matched only by your self delusion in your debating skills.

What debating skills? I see words. Post proofs, Scarecrow!

 

[Fatihah]

Fatihah, try to keep up.

buoyÅanÅcy/ÈbTj

Yn

si, Èbu

yYn

si/
Show Spelled Pronunciation [boi-uh

n-see, boo-yuh

n-see]
–noun
1.the power to float or rise in a fluid; relative lightness.
2.the power of supporting a body so that it floats; upward pressure exerted by the fluid in which a body is immersed.3.lightness or resilience of spirit; cheerfulness.

Main Entry: buoy·an·cy
Pronunciation: \Èboi-Yn(t)-s, Èbü-yYn(t)-\
Function: noun
Date: 1713
1 a: the tendency of a body to float or to rise when submerged in a fluid b: the power of a fluid to exert an upward force on a body placed in it ; also : the upward force exerted
2: the ability to recover quickly from depression or discouragement : resilience
3: the property of maintaining a satisfactorily high level (as of prices or economic activity)

Response: Yes the word is a noun depending on it's use of the word. When referring to the property of buoyancy it is a noun but the meaning of the word is a verb. Even the word "verb" is a "noun". If I say "the man is going to run up the street", the word "run" is a verb. But if I say that "the time it takes the man to run up the street is 5 minutes" the word run is now a noun. This is simple english. There's the difference. So yes, you try to keep up.

 

[themadhair]

If I say "the man is going to run up the street", the word "run" is a verb. But if I say that "the time it takes the man to run up the street is 5 minutes" the word run is now a noun. This is simple english. There's the difference. So yes, you try to keep up.

Actually the word ‘run’ is still a verb in your second example. So you have a problem with English as well as reality?

 

[Fatihah]

Isn't that odd. Fatihah has not come back to tell me that my dictionary excerpts are wrong yet.

Response: I just did. Again, I'm on my blackberry phone, so the responses do not show right away. Even as we speak, this response as well as the last three are not showing at the moment. Some responses will show right away while others won't. However, you don't have to worry. When I finally see your responses, I will debunk them.

 

[themadhair]

buoyancy conjugation in English, English verb conjugator, conjugation table- Reverso

 

[Fatihah]

Seems that Fatihah has been reduced to "'I know you are but what am I'" type responses.
I sure hope Allah is mighty proud of him,
'Cause I would downright embarrassed.

Response: But your not Allah (swt) and unlike you Allah(swt) is not possessed with denial.

 

[Fatihah]

Okay. Thanks for the discussion I think we've both had our say.

Response: O.K. Thank you as well.

 

[McBell]

Response: But your not Allah (swt) and unlike you Allah(swt) is not possessed with denial.

Response: I see words, where is the proof?

 

[Fatihah]

LOL - Post #509 is no different than the rest of the trash you've posted, while acting as if you are painting masterpieces. Your fanaticism for your religion is matched only by your self delusion in your debating skills.

Response: Likewise.

 

[Fatihah]

Actually the word ‘run’ is still a verb in your second example. So you have a problem with English as well as reality?

Response: Says the person who says "definitional equivalent" is a word. (Post 398 of page 40)

 

[ThereIsNoSpoon]

far too many western scientists do prove that the scientific evidences found in the Qur'an are not man made.

Still so many folks believing this hoax ? More than 20 years ago there started a media campaign using scientists to boast that science-quran claim. "numerous" scientists have been mailed by me and replied that the reports on certain "sites" are bogus fabrications and misrepresentations of their original statements. And frankly ... any "scientists" who makes statements the like of which are often quoted in my view can not be one. He would violate fundamental principles of science making such claims.

 

[gnostic]

I have not communicated with Muslims until I came here, and to few other similar forums.

I've come to the conclusion that today's Muslims have no understanding of science. They don't even have understanding of their Qur'an.

They are merely fools that quoted from Qur'an, and trying to give credits for scientific-dumb Qur'an without any explanations or evidences.

Their reasoning are clearly inferior today than those Muslim scientists in their past. At least those scientists have done something useful with science and technology. Today, they only resort to propaganda, because they have no scientific reasoning left.

 

[themadhair]

Response: Says the person who says "definitional equivalent" is a word. (Post 398 of page 40)

I never claimed it was a word. It is quite clearly two words. We express concepts and ideas by combining words together as a representation of those concepts and ideas. We call small combinations of words representing and idea or concept a ‘phrase’, which I believe was the word I used to describe it.

It is also quite interesting that you made no attempt to defend the falsity of run being a noun. This completely-avoiding-criticism trend of yours is funny the first twenty times. Now that it is predictable and the last refuge of the intellectually dishonest (or intellectually incapable but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt) it is frankly hilarious.

 

[McBell]

I have not communicated with Muslims until I came here, and to few other similar forums.

I've come to the conclusion that today's Muslims have no understanding of science. They don't even have understanding of their Qur'an.

They are merely fools that quoted from Qur'an, and trying to give credits for scientific-dumb Qur'an without any explanations or evidences.

Their reasoning are clearly inferior today than those Muslim scientists in their past. At least those scientists have done something useful with science and technology. Today, they only resort to propaganda, because they have no scientific reasoning left.

Please, whatever you do, do not assume that all Muslims are like that of Fatihah and eselam. I have spent many an hour with Muslims face to face and I can say with much confidence that Fatihah and eselam are both a serious disgrace to Islam.

 

[ThereIsNoSpoon]

I have not communicated with Muslims until I came here, and to few other similar forums.

I did a lot although i can't say it was always positive (or negative)

I've come to the conclusion that today's Muslims have no understanding of science.

I would equate many muslims with creationists in america concerning that aspect. For me it seems the two are similar in more ways than they would like to admit. The real difference is that creationists reject science while not understanding it while muslims tend to believe all science is in the quran while not understanding it.

They don't even have understanding of their Qur'an.

My experience would make me agree concerning those muslims you normally find in forums. I welcome any exceptions and certainly there are enough ... sadly they are not normally found in forums when it comes to religious and science discussions.