moral question

[McBell]

Having trouble with perception again?

Your transference is duly noted.

 

[Autodidact]

Only the ones that will grow up and support abortion. The rest should live. The ones that support abortion should know how it feels to be stripped of their rights to live a full life. So I say it is right to kill the ones that will one day support killing babies. You know, the old what comes around goes around thingy. But it should be wrong to kill those who will one day grow up and value the lives of others.

I got you. You think murdering people who disagree with you, or rather, babies who will grow up to disagree with you, is moral. Good to know. btw, how do you tell which is which?

 

[McBell]

I got you. You think murdering people who disagree with you, or rather, babies who will grow up to disagree with you, is moral. Good to know. btw, how do you tell which is which?

Um...
Well, you just gotta kill them all and hope any that escape your righteously divine killing spree grow up agreeing with you?

 

[Father Heathen]

Only the ones that will grow up and support abortion. The rest should live. The ones that support abortion should know how it feels to be stripped of their rights to live a full life. So I say it is right to kill the ones that will one day support killing babies. You know, the old what comes around goes around thingy. But it should be wrong to kill those who will one day grow up and value the lives of others.

And how would that work?

 

[Autodidact]

Let me clarify the issue. However YOU define a baby, do you think it's right or wrong to deliberately kill them?

(why is it only Christians find this question difficult to answer? It's almost as though their religion retards their moral sense.)

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

Only the ones that will grow up and support abortion. The rest should live. The ones that support abortion should know how it feels to be stripped of their rights to live a full life. So I say it is right to kill the ones that will one day support killing babies. You know, the old what comes around goes around thingy. But it should be wrong to kill those who will one day grow up and value the lives of others.

It seems to me that the bit in red means that the bit in blue applies to you. Interesting.

 

[sandy whitelinger]

Quote:
So this what I'm going to say. Is killing anybody right or wrong?

Perhaps, very rarely, but certainly not innocent infants who pose no threat to you.

Why is an infant any better than an innocent adult who poses no threat?

 

[sandy whitelinger]

How could killing a baby be self-defense?

If a baby points a loaded weapon at you and starts to pull the trigger?

 

[sandy whitelinger]

Um hello, haven't you seen Chucky? Oh wait, he was a doll...

I would kill Chucky.

 

[sandy whitelinger]

yes it would. because they let the little the girls live for raping...
essentially altering the race forever...

You say to-may-to I say to-mah-to.

 

[sandy whitelinger]

Is this a redo of another long-winded earlier thread. It's like dejavu all over again.
Is killing a baby killing thread ok? In self defense?

 

[sandy whitelinger]

No, I don't think the method makes any difference, although I do think stabbing them to death with a sword is particularly heinous.

Are dead baby jokes heinous?

 

[Autodidact]

Quote:
So this what I'm going to say. Is killing anybody right or wrong?
Why is an infant any better than an innocent adult who poses no threat?

With an adult, the person seeking to justify their unprovoked attack can conjure up some claim of culpability by the victim, however spurious. With a baby, there's no question about culpability. So I'm wondering how people who rely on this book for their moral compass justify it.

 

[Autodidact]

If a baby points a loaded weapon at you and starts to pull the trigger?

I would think you could jump, but O.K. At least aim for the little footie.

 

[sandy whitelinger]

With an adult, the person seeking to justify their unprovoked attack can conjure up some claim of culpability by the victim, however spurious. With a baby, there's no question about culpability. So I'm wondering how people who rely on this book for their moral compass justify it.

I, see, so it's not about who gets killed?

 

[sandy whitelinger]

I would think you could jump, but O.K. At least aim for the little footie.

Center mass.

 

[Autodidact]

I, see, so it's not about who gets killed?

? It's about whether there is any rationale for killing the person who gets killed. Even if you think some killing is lawful or moral, do you think killing babies falls into this category?

 

[sandy whitelinger]

? It's about whether there is any rationale for killing the person who gets killed. Even if you think some killing is lawful or moral, do you think killing babies falls into this category?

I want a clear explanation why it matters whether it's a baby or an adult. You seemed to imply that it was only a matter of the reason of the perpetrator.

 

[painted wolf]

wa:do

 

[waitasec]

Well, it wouldn't be gonocide if they didn't kill the babies now, would it?

yes it would. because they let the little the girls live for raping...
essentially altering the race forever...

You say to-may-to I say to-mah-to.

genocide is the systematic killing of a racial or cultural group.

a pig with lipstick is still a pig