The references does not specify an apostle. It is more prophetic. Constantin is a candidate. Your interpretation is not accepted by 98% of Christians.
The text states: "
“‘I know your works, your toil and your patient endurance, and how you cannot bear evil men but have tested those who call themselves apostles but are not, and found them to be false;" It is directed to the Church of Ephesus..
Did Constantine ever preach in Ephesus? Did he ever claim to be an apostle? No.
Do you have any evidence, citation or even suggestion that somebody else could be?
There we go again with the 98% of Christians. This is a fallacy. The number of Christians not believing this interpretation is completely irrelevant.
Which one is not true? That he stayed in Ephesus for about three years (Acts 20:31), that he admitted that all who were in Asia turned away from him ((2 Tim1:15), or that he was not charged with lying (1 Tim 2:7)?
No it is an argument of fact of the by far dominate view of Paul in the History of Christianity.
It is a text book ad populum fallacy, and I'm almost certain that you know it. Truth is not democratic.
We agree to disagree then...