dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Actually some of my references did reference text
From your research, which passages of the writing from that region of that era show the strongest most obvious correspondence to the Hebrew Bible?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually some of my references did reference text
Yours presumes your superior objectivity.
Your thinking is too narrow. There are many including Roman rulers that may fit.Do we know of anyone else who was in Asia claiming to be an Apostle but was not? I don't think so.
Don't forget that Paul teachings differ from what Jesus taught in the gospels.
God's truth is God's truth. Those who don't understand it don't understand it, as the truth is revealed by God.Your thinking is too narrow. There are many including Roman rulers that may fit.
By far most if not 98% of all Christians regardless of denomination would emphatically disagree, Paul's letters are in virtually all Bibles and regarded as scripture.
Personally from my perspective the whole Bible is without provenance and Christianity is torn asunder by contradictory beliefs each rejecting everyone else.
I don't even know what his culture is.It’s a part of his culture.
To be fair, his culture is not the only culture that takes that approach.
Well. I'll need to study this more but so far, I am sorry, I just don't see disparity or deceit.But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty[pangouros], I caught you with guile[dolo].
2 Corinthians 12:16, KJV
And so be it. I have not burdened you, but instead, being astute, I obtained you by guile.
Catholic Public Domain Version
Cognate: 3835 panoúrgos – properly, a person doing anything to get their way ("anything it takes"). 3935 /paríēmi ("crafty-fellow") is used only in 2 Cor 12:16 where it describes a scoundrel (an unscrupulous person) who will do any evil to "succeed." See 3834 (panourgia).
1388 dólos – properly, bait; (figuratively) deceit (trickery) using bait to alure ("hook") people, especially those already festering in excessive, emotional pain (brought on by themselves).
Also it's implied by the difference between what he said happened on the road to Damascus and what was reported in Acts 9.
And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: [it is] hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord [said] unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.
Acts 9:5-6
And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.
But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;
Delivering thee from the people, and [from] the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,
To open their eyes, [and] to turn [them] from darkness to light, and [from] the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
Acts 26:15-18
Asking me for specifics? My references deal with the specifics in detail citing the Torah, Dead Sea scrolls, and the Nag Hammadi, and Canaanite literature and comparing the texts. I could not any more specific than already cited.From your research, which passages of the writing from that region of that era show the strongest most obvious correspondence to the Hebrew Bible?
I don't even know what his culture is.
Dolos means deceit. Dolos is translated as guile in 2 Cor 12:16.Well. I'll need to study this more but so far, I am sorry, I just don't see disparity or deceit.
I don't get to know some posters.He explains it up above. It has something to do with the objective nature of his culture vs the subjective natures of most other cultures.
I did try to point out above several times that his culture is not the only culture that does that.
Mostly, he uses it to deny Black history.
I can only suppose that the struggle against slavery was not a holy cause to him, so he’s trying to project his own religion onto Black cultures who fought in those wars.
Out of curiosity, what method of analysis in this matter would you accept?How do you know the information you have comes from any god(s)? How is faith a pathway to truth?
I don't get to know some posters.
Your 78 LP has a crack in it. Not the subject of the thread. Please respond to the topic.Yours presumes your superior objectivity.
Remember....
You're the guy who extensively argued
with me that I'm a creationist. (I'm still not.)
So your objectivity & judgment are highly suspect.
The snake story is a obvious lieSo how was Paul lying?
The snake story is part of an ancient evolved myth, and of course obviously not true, though unfortunately many people believe ancient myths are true and not by definition a lie, just deluded and conditioned to believe mostly when they are young .The snake story is a obvious lie
OK sorry but I still don't see the problem.Dolos means deceit. Dolos is translated as guile in 2 Cor 12:16.
1388 dólos – properly, bait; (figuratively) deceit (trickery) using bait to alure ("hook") people, especially those already festering in excessive, emotional pain (brought on by themselves).
I did.Not the subject of the thread. Please respond to the topic.
Yes, and you failed to make a coherent response.I did.
You made objectivity the subject.
Not really, you selectively Ducked, Bobbed and Weaseled off topic.I responded.
Do you now object to the topic you introduced?
I think you failed to make a coherent inference.Yes, and you failed to make a coherent response.
??? Did you read the text? Like whom?Your thinking is too narrow. There are many including Roman rulers that may fit.
Of course they would, but that's an argument ad populum, a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because many people think so.By far most if not 98% of all Christians regardless of denomination would emphatically disagree, Paul's letters are in virtually all Bibles and regarded as scripture.
I agree.Personally from my perspective the whole Bible is without provenance and Christianity is torn asunder by contradictory beliefs each rejecting everyone else.