Actually, I think you've missed the entire point of the text.Unless you don't agree with the translated wording.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually, I think you've missed the entire point of the text.Unless you don't agree with the translated wording.
I don't think I have actually. The text is from Christian Bible, that is why I asked if you agree with the translation.Actually, I think you've missed the entire point of the text.
In any case, an omniscient and eternal God, who claims to be God of all people, can not be bound by societal and chronological context, otherwise he is a false God..I believe that a person should demonstrate a genuine effort to understand the societal context.
but gives instructions of how to treat slaves
The following previously cited article extensively translated from Hebrew concerning dating Deborah.Your position would be stronger if examples from the original texts are included, agreed?
No Holy wars were not fought over slavery. Wars over slavery like USA North versus South were over the moral issue of slavery among Christians, and some slave rebellions in the Americas. Holy wars are fought over differences of Religion. ie Jews, Christians, Protestants versus the Roman Church, and Muslims. Yes persecution pogroms, and ethnic cleansing are often motivated by religious differences.Holy Wars were fought over the treatment of slaves.
No Holy wars were not fought over slavery. Wars over slavery like USA North versus South were over the moral issue of slavery among Christians, and some slave rebellions in the Americas. Holy wars are fought over differences of Religion. ie Jews, Christians, Protestants versus the Roman Church, and Muslims. Yes persecution pogroms, and ethnic cleansing are often motivated by religious differences.
I'm currently in the early stages of a two phase road trip, each phase being a roughly 2000 mile round trip. Let me get back to this when I have a bit more time and access to my books.I don't think I have actually. The text is from Christian Bible, that is why I asked if you agree with the translation.
Does God condemn slavery? No! Not only he allows it, but gives instructions of how to treat slaves. Are slaves his creatures, or is he only interested in the Jews and supposedly made thousands of miracles to save them from slavery?
In any case, an omniscient and eternal God, who claims to be God of all people, can not be bound by societal and chronological context, otherwise he is a false God..
Of course...you too...safe trip!I'm currently in the early stages of a two phase road trip, each phase being a roughly 2000 mile round trip. Let me get back to this when I have a bit more time and access to my books.
Take care ...
Why not read what Paul had to say about the value of his education versus the value of his faith? (Philippians 3:4-7) Then we (hopefully) can have a more meaningful discussion. You are locked in "head knowledge", which is sad to those of us who have moved beyond it to faith.Like everyone I 'think both objectively and subjectively.
My academic references do not depend on my errors in grammar. Your failure to respond to the references reveals your avoidance of the facts and your emphasis on the fallacy of judgement based on your annal view of grammar.
Your premise that "Nobody truly understands the scriptures unless they believe as you do," eliminates any possible constructive dialogue.
The other premise that determine your stoic stonewalling against information is your ancient perspective of the argument is Academia versus God.
Paul was a huge liar, megalomaniac and totally unreliable.Why not read what Paul had to say about the value of his education versus the value of his faith? (Philippians 3:4-7) Then we (hopefully) can have a more meaningful discussion. You are locked in "head knowledge", which is sad to those of us who have moved beyond it to faith.
I was in academia for many years, so I know whereof I speak.
So how was Paul lying?Paul was a huge liar, megalomaniac and totally unreliable.
He claimed that "For neither did I receive it (the gospel) from man, nor was I taught it, but it came to me through revelation of Jesus Christ."(Galatians 1:12).
According to Acts 9, the only words that Jesus told him on the road to Damascus were: "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?” and “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting; 6 but rise and enter the city, and you will be told what you are to do.”
But in Acts 9:19-21 it is written that "For several days he was with the disciples at Damascus. 20 And in the synagogues immediately he proclaimed Jesus, saying, “He is the Son of God.” 21 And all who heard him were amazed, and said, “Is not this the man who made havoc in Jerusalem of those who called on this name?"
I have read this, It does not help your case of intentional ignorance,Why not read what Paul had to say about the value of his education versus the value of his faith? (Philippians 3:4-7) Then we (hopefully) can have a more meaningful discussion. You are locked in "head knowledge", which is sad to those of us who have moved beyond it to faith.
I was in academia for many years,
Intentional ignorance based on an ancient tribal agenda,so I know whereof I speak.
He wasn't lying. Anyone who claims that he did is just looking for a way to slander him.So how was Paul lying?
Yes, your rejection of academia.Intentional ignorance?
I actually do not believe Paul lied, He simply believed in God and Jesus Christ from a Hellenist Roman perspective and was the founder of the Roman Church, He sincerely believed what he wrote.He wasn't lying. Anyone who claims that he did is just looking for a way to slander him.
It would be an oxymoron if worded a "Moral Old Testament."Morality" & "Old Testament".
Those words seem incompatible.
At least if one values modern
secular notions of human rights.
FWIW, I graduated summa cum laude, have a Master's degree and headed a university research lab for several years. I don't reject academia, but judge it for what it's worth.Yes, your rejection of academia.
That insight is relevant to Israel's treatment of Palestinians.It would be an oxymoron if worded a "Moral Old Testament.
a) It was the disciples who taught him for several days and perhaps Barnabas and immediately started preaching. Jesus taught him nothing.So how was Paul lying?