Elaborating.....How dare you say such a thing sir. That show is great.
I'd read that the show is about the relationship of these 2 women.
That isn't inherently bad....but it doesn't do it for me in this show.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mueller Report Released. Thoughts?
- Thread starter Revoltingest
- Start date
I'd read that the show is about the relationship of these 2 women.
That isn't inherently bad....but it doesn't do it for me in this show.
PureX
Veteran Member
We are not going to move onto any of those other issues because the oligarchy that run this country already have those issues settled to their satisfaction. All they're really interested in now is keeping the rest of us fighting among ourselves while they keep robbing us all blind.
On the plus side, that would suggest that Mueller's investigation was independent.
I know the oligarchy is your primary concern,
but what is your opinion of Mueller's report?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
If Trump is indeed a "crime boss", then the convictions would
be based upon Trump's actions or orders. Which were those?
I ask because the crimes I recall were independent of their
relationship with Trump.
PureX
Veteran Member
It shows that Trump did everything he could to obstruct the course and responsibility of justice in this country. Something I would have to assume is a breach of his oath of office. And why would he have behaved that way if he were so 'innocent' of any sort of collusion? Also, collusion is extremely difficult to prove because in many instances people can collude without ever having to meet and agree verbally (or otherwise) to do so. And if someone met and agreed to collude on his behalf you'd have to prove he knew it and directed it in advance, or found out and approved of it in retrospect. Both, also very hard to prove. And moreover, Donald Trump is a near mental and emotional retard. How do you prove anything going on in a mind that is that bizarrely self-centered, profoundly muddled, and insanely myopic? He's mentally incapable of following a coarse of reason beyond whatever is good for his ego in the moment. The kind of collusion being investigated is too complex and persisting for Trump's moment-to-moment myopic attention span.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Obviously you have missed it's subtle but deeply philosophical undercurrent of showing right and wrong as both sides of the popsicle...
This is all stuff you've said before the report.
I'm wondering about what you found in it.
Obviously that & the counterpoint of the surrealism of the underlying metaphor.
This.
averageJOE
zombie
The narrative is the most important thing here. The narrative that CNN and MSNBC have been pushing everyday for the past 2 1/2 years. And the narrative is: (in a nutshell) Trump is a Putin puppet who's campaign colluded with Russia to influence the election. That's the only part Trump's base care about. Now this report concluded that there is no evidence of this. Now, we are seeing a massive moving of the goal posts where instead of yelling "Russia, Russia, Russia!!!" they are yelling "Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction!!!"
This is not going to hurt Trump. In fact, in my prediction, this is exactly how he gets re-elected. Because right now Bernie Sanders is the only one who can beat Trump (Tulsi Gabbard can beat him as well, but that's a different topic), and the DNC will once again do everything in their power to force another establishment/centrist through the primaries. And whoever it is, whether it's Buttigeig, O'Rourke, Biden, or Harris, Trump will beat them. (Biden would hands down be the easiest for Trump to beat) Because ALL the 2020 democratic candidates, except for Tulsi Gabbard, bought into Russia-gate.
Now on a final note, shouldn't we all agree that there being no evidence for Russia influencing our elections is a good thing?
This is not going to hurt Trump. In fact, in my prediction, this is exactly how he gets re-elected. Because right now Bernie Sanders is the only one who can beat Trump (Tulsi Gabbard can beat him as well, but that's a different topic), and the DNC will once again do everything in their power to force another establishment/centrist through the primaries. And whoever it is, whether it's Buttigeig, O'Rourke, Biden, or Harris, Trump will beat them. (Biden would hands down be the easiest for Trump to beat) Because ALL the 2020 democratic candidates, except for Tulsi Gabbard, bought into Russia-gate.
Now on a final note, shouldn't we all agree that there being no evidence for Russia influencing our elections is a good thing?
Where did you get the idea that there is no evidence for Russia influencing your election? The Mueller Report says the exact opposite.
The first freekin sentence:
“The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion.”
ecco
Veteran Member
2020
I think it was a failed coup that cost the American tax payer $27 million.
Do you think it would have been better if there was no Mueller investigation?
Should they have just ignored the Russian interference in your election?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Are you including the campaign finance violations that he made in this statement?
Countries interfere with other countries elections all the time. All of them do it to each other all the time. This is no revelation.
It was a failed coup attempt by butt hurt Dems who lost the plot years ago, and are slipping further into madness with each passing day.